5 opposition parties submit bills aimed at scrapping security laws


Five opposition parties on Friday submitted two bills that aim to scrap controversial security laws enacted last year in a challenge to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s stance on the role of Japan’s armed forces.

The Democratic Party of Japan, the Japanese Communist Party and three other opposition parties claim the government’s approval to exercise the right to collective self-defense in the legislation is unconstitutional.

The parties filed the bills to the House of Representatives ahead of the government putting the security laws into effect on March 29. By jointly presenting the bills to the Diet, the five parties aim to make this a campaign issue for a House of Councillors election in the summer.

The three other parties who co-authored the bills are the Japan Innovation Party, the Social Democratic Party and the People’s Life Party.

Before presenting the bills, leaders of the five parties agreed to cooperate in Diet activities and national elections with the goal of scrapping the security laws and eventually toppling the Abe government.

“The five parties will cooperate so we can force the ruling parties into a minority,” DPJ President Katsuya Okada told reporters after holding talks with four other opposition leaders.

Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party forms the ruling coalition with the Komeito party.

Secretaries general of the five parties will enter into talks to determine specific tactics they will use in the fight against the ruling coalition, according to opposition lawmakers.

The LDP-led coalition controls a majority in the upper house and a two-thirds majority in the more powerful lower house.

The bills call for the abolition of the two security laws—a law comprising revisions to 10 existing security-related laws and a new permanent law allowing the Self-Defense Forces to provide logistical support to foreign militaries in international peacekeeping activities.

The first law, including revisions to the SDF law, allows the country to exercise the right to collective self-defense—or coming to the aid of the United States and other friendly nations under armed attack even if Japan itself is not attacked.

Abe and other proponents say the law boosts Japan’s deterrence capability amid an increasingly tense security environment in the region. China’s military buildup and rising territorial ambitions, as well as North Korea’s missile and nuclear weapons development are factors driving the government’s position.

Speaking at a news conference Friday, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga said the government-sponsored laws are the “best legislation” within the scope of the Constitution.

Referring to North Korea’s fourth nuclear test last month and rocket launch earlier this month, which is regarded by many nations as a long-range ballistic missile test, Suga said, “When thinking about the security environment surrounding our country, I think it was really good that (the Diet) enacted the laws” with the backing of the ruling coalition and three minor opposition parties.

LDP Secretary General Sadakazu Tanigaki criticized Friday’s action by the five opposition parties.

“If they had planned to submit the bills, they should have presented views about Japan’s security at the Budget Committee and other functions (at the Diet). But they hardly voiced their position,” Tanigaki said at a news conference.

In a related move, the DPJ and the JIP on Thursday submitted to the lower house three bills as counterproposals to the security laws.

The bills advocate expanding the scope of the SDF’s activities without exercising the right to collective self-defense.


feminist scammer Jenny Mcdermott doxxing and false accusing Shoe0nHead’s boyfriend of rape



she claims that Shoeonhead is 17 when she is 24.   even if she is/was 17 that’s above the age of consent. Shoe lives in both new York and Canada where the age of consent is 16



reading the comments it is alleged that Jenny is jealous of Shoeonheads’ beauty and youthfullness

a comment

Keep in mind that this is the same unethical, lying piece of shit SJW that tried to get Thunderf00t fired and then herself got fired for setting up a fraudulent GoFundMe page. Nothing she says, nothing she does, nothing she ever will do matters one bit to anyone but herself. She’s a waste of perfectly good air. But she’s one of the “good guys”. A merry band of cheats, frauds, liars, bullies, rapists, and pedophiles. Masters of projection.

another comment

In this video we see a bitter ex drug whore far past her prime who never hooked up with the local popular hot guy and holds on to the only interactions she had with him for dear life bringing them up in every single video about him she can squeeze out. We watch as the lanky horsefaced Justin Bieber corpse spirals out of control for months after she finds out her senpai is dating a cute, hot, young woman with rocking tits and curves. Finally when she loses her job and every once of dignity she had, she has nothing left and resorts to accusing her senpai of rape (because that’s always a feminists last straw!) with absolutely no proof. Slandering him and calling him a pedophile for dating a twenty four year old.

Bravo Jenny McDermott. You are the biggest fuck up on the internet since Chris Chan.

Guys: Never Talk to a College Girl



The more I read about the current climate on America’s college and university campuses, the more convinced I am that no man smart enough to go to college would ever be stupid enough to date a college girl.

Feminists have ginned up a frightening hysteria of anti-male fear among female students. Any boy who kisses a girl on campus could be expelled for sexual assault, and even speaking to a college girl might result in accusations of harassment. Feminist “rape culture” rhetoric has incited such a virulent hatred of males among college girls that they go berserk at the idea of a man being invited to speak on campus, even if the man is homosexual. A frenzy of uncontrollable madness was unleashed whenMilo Yiannopoulos spoke last week at Rutgers University:

Breitbart tech editor Milo Yiannopoulos made an appearance at Rutgers University, and his ideas and rhetoric so traumatized the delicate flowers who heard him that many of them attended a “group therapy” session afterward.
You are not going to believe what happened next:

According to the [Rutgers student newspaper The Daily Targum], students and faculty members held a wound-licking gathering at a cultural center on campus, where students described “feeling scared, hurt, and discriminated against.”
“A variety of different organizations and departments were present to listen, answer questions and show support” to the apparently weak and vulnerable students, who just a few days prior had disrupted Yiannopoulos’ event by smearing fake blood on their faces and chanting protest slogans.
One student at the event told the Targum that they “broke down crying” after the event, while another reported that he felt “scared to walk around campus the next day.” According to the report, “many others” said they felt “unsafe” at the event and on campus afterwards.
“It is upsetting that my mental health is not cared about by the University,” said one student at the event. “I do not know what else to do for us to be heard for us to be cared about. I deserve an apology, everyone in this room deserves an apology.”
A number of organizations were at the event to offer support to the poor, traumatised students. These included Psychiatric Services, the Office for Violence Prevention and Victim Assistance, and the Rutgers University Police.


Dear God, the education system is turning kids into spineless cowards. My paratrooper son spends his days jumping out of C-130s and marching for miles with 70 pounds of gear on his back, but Rutgers students “broke down crying” and were “scared to walk around campus” because Milo gave a speech? Are there any sane students at Rutgers? Are there no responsible adults in the administration or faculty? Like every other university in America, Rutgers has been descending into decadent chaos for years, as evidenced by this story from September 2014:

Jessica Valenti hopes to redefine
what rape really means

A Rutgers graduate with a master’s degree in women’s and gender studies, Jessica Valenti . . . addressed an almost-full Trayes Hall in the Douglass Campus Center yesterday during her presentation, called “Yes Means Yes: Battling Rape Culture and Moving Towards a Positive Sexuality.” . . .
“I am a feminist this month because a student and activist Emma Sulkowicz carries around a mattress to all of her classes in protest until her rapist is kicked out of her school,” Valenti said.
Valenti hopes to redefine rape, saying that the word has been so distorted that it makes it difficult for sexual assault survivors to admit and report rape. She added that society tends not to believe victims.
The new definition of rape, she said, must include of inequalities and discriminations in society . . .

What does this mean? It means never talk to a college girl.

“The new definition of rape” means that everything is rape, if a feminist says it is rape, and guess what? Any guy who talks to a college girl is a rapist, because “inequalities and discriminations in society” or something. Whatever. Feminists like Jessica Valenti clearly won’t be happy until males are forbidden to attend college. Heterosexuality will be prohibited on campus and guys will be subject to arrest if they go anywhere within 500 feet of a college girl. And this would probably be a good idea, because college girls are so crazy now that no parent would want their son to associate with one of them.


ICNA Canada’s online syllabus: pregnant adulteress to be stoned after giving birth



The book “Riyad us Saliheen” (“The Gardens of the Righteous”) which appears on ICNA Canada site adds modern commentary to the verses from the Qur’an and hadith.

The following are excerpts from the book which deal with the stoning of a pregnant adulteress:

[Hadith]: 22. Imran bin Al-Husain Al-Hhuza`i (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: A woman from the tribe Juhainah came to Messenger of Allah (PBUH) while she was pregnant from (Zina) adultery and said to him: “O Messenger of Allah! I have committed an offense liable to Hadd (prescribed punishment), so exact the execution of the sentence.” Messenger of Allah (PBUH) called her guardian and said to him, “Treat her kindly. Bring her to me after the delivery of the child.” That man complied with the orders. At last the Prophet (PBUH) commanded to carry out the sentence. Her clothes were secured around her and she was stoned to death. The Prophet (PBUH) led her funeral prayers. `Umar submitted: “O Messenger of Allah! She committed Zina and you have performed funeral prayer for her?” He replied, “Verily, she made repentance which would suffice for seventy of the people of Al- Madinah if it is divided among them. Can there be any higher degree of repentance than that she sacrificed her life voluntarily to win the Pleasure of Allah, the Exalted?”.


Commentary: This Hadith highlights the following five points:

l. It confirms the validity of the punishment of Rajm [stoning] for the adulterer, that is to say that he should be stoned to death.

2. The merit of sincere pardon.

3. The description of fear of Allah as well as of accountability on the Day of Resurrection by the Prophet’s Companions, and their preference for punishment of sins in this world rather than in the Hereafter.

4. It is permissible to perform the funeral prayer of one who has been guilty of major sins, provided he has not been taking them as lawful because in that case there is danger of disbelief..

5. A pregnant woman cannot be punished with Rajm until she gives birth to the child and the period specified for suckling the baby is completed.”


[Hadith]: 913. `Imran bin Husain (May Allah be pleased with them) reported: A woman belonging to the Juhainah tribe came to the Messenger of Allah (PBUH) after having conceived from Zina. She submitted: “O Messenger of Allah! I am liable to Hadd (punishment ordained by Allah), so execute it.” The Messenger of Allah (PBUH) called her guardian and said, “Treat her well and bring her to me after delivery.” He acted accordingly. Then the Messenger of Allah (PBUH) commanded to tie her clothes firmly around her and then stoned her to death. He (PBUH) then offered funeral prayer for her. [Muslim].

Commentary: This Hadith has relevance to the theme of the chapter as we see it. Moreover, it reveals that if a woman becomes pregnant after committing adultery, she will not be subjected to punishment immediately. Instead, the penalty [stoning] will take place after childbirth. This will certainly contribute to the remission of her sins and will also be a factor in offering the funeral prayer for her.

The act of stoning is also a “purification for the believer”

Sheikh Faisal Hamid Abdur-Razak (الشيخ فيصل حميد عبد الرزاق), a well known Imam in Brampton, Ontario, who also serves as President of the Islamic Forum of Canada and Vice-President of the Islamic Council of Imams of Canada, said in a sermon few years ago the following:

“Even in Islamic Sharia [Law] the act of stoning is also done to reject certain evil actions, evil deeds. If someone commits certain crimes in Islam, and he is found guilty by an Islamic court, one of the punishments is stoning to death, signifying our rejection of evil actions as well.”

“But there is something else; there is something else that the stoning does to the believer. For Iblis [satan], for the Shaytan [satan], is rejecting him [refers to one of the rituals during the annual Islamic Hajj pilgrimage to the holy city of Mecca, in which Muslim pilgrims fling pebbles at three walls signifying the stoning of the devil] and rejecting his attempt to influence us.”

“But for the believer there is an important benefit. Someone in the time of the Prophet, peace be upon him, committed an immoral act, which requires stoning, came to the Prophet, peace be upon him, and confessed the Prophet, peace be upon him, and the Prophet kept turning away from him, Glorious is Allah, as he didn’t want to hear it.”

“But the companion [صحابي] he knew he had done something wrong, he kept going in front of the Prophet, peace be upon him, [and said]: ‘O Messenger of Allah [يا رسول الله] I did this, I must be punished. The Prophet, peace be upon him, kept turning away, moving away from him, as he didn’t want to hear this and the companion [صحابي] ] kept persisting, going and walking in front of the Prophet [saying]: ‘O Messenger of Allah [يا رسول الله] I did this, I must be punished.”

“And finally the Prophet ordered that he will be stoned to death. And this was done, and the Prophet, peace be upon him, ordered that he will be prepared for [an Islamic] funeral [جنازة] and the Prophet himself prayed [in] his funeral [جنازة]. He [Mohammad] told his companions: ‘he is in heaven [جنة], he is purified, he is purified’. So, this act of stoning now [meaning as is learnt from this story] is also purification for the believer.”

Showing kindness to one facing death sentence”

The following is a excerpt of Sheikh Faisal Hamid Abdur-Razak’s book: The Book of Death:


“5.1 Imran bin Husain (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: A woman belonging to the Juhaina tribe came to Allah’s Messenger peace be upon him (PBUH) and she had become pregnant as a result of fornication. She submitted: O Messenger of Allah! PBUH, I have done something for which punishment must be imposed upon me, so impose that. Allah’s Messenger PBUH called her guardian and said: Treat her well and bring her to me after delivery. He acted accordingly. Then Allah’s Messenger PBUH commanded to tie her clothes firmly around her and then stone her to death. He then offered her funeral prayer. (MUSLIM)”

See also:

ICNA Canada’s online syllabus on wife beating

ICNA Canada’s online syllabus on stoning adulterers, chopping off thieves’ hands

ICNA Canada’s online syllabus on wearing hijab and honour killing in Islam

ICNA Canada’s online syllabus legalizes “slave-girls”

ICNA Canada online syllabus: “Muslims will dominate the Jews”, kill them

ICNA Canada syllabus: “give us victory over the disbelieving people”

ICNA Canada’s syllabus explains ruling on ‘sex slaves’ in Islam

ICNA Canada free book: “Every human being is born as a Muslim”

ICNA – Canada’s senior official appears to blame gays for Ontario “lurid” sex education

Trudeau: We strive to show that “Islam is not incompatible” with Western values