Month: October 2014

by

Are All Male Feminists Sex Predators, Paedophiles, and Rapists?

 

Are All Male Feminists Sex Predators, Paedophiles, and Rapists?

• February 29, 2012 • 32 Comments

Are all male feminists sex predators, paedophiles, and rapists?  I’m beginning to think, at the very least, that any self-identified ‘male feminist’, and certainly those who make a career out of that identity, should be placed on some kind of FBI watch list.

Hugo Schwyzer is the latest mangina to be exposed as someone unable to keep it in his pants – at least when vulnerable pussy is there for a beta male penis to take advantage of.  Having sex with your students would normally count as a perk of the job in my anti-feminist eyes, but when the man doing the boning has bought into the sexual trade union ideology of ‘power structures rendering consent impossible’, and such crap, then it does mean your actions are effectively those of a self-confessed rapist.

As part of his role as a full-time mangina, Hugo had also been enthusiastically organising young females into taking part in ‘slut walks’.  Another ‘perk of the job’, I guess.  This is eerily reminiscent of another leading male feminist – David Futrelle –  and his use of blogging as a thinly disguised means to arrange ‘meet-ups’ with his female readers, some of whom are clearly vulnerable, mentally disturbed, or even children.  This is a guy who has described a grown man’s fantasy of sexually assaulting a boy as ‘tender and erotic’ and who spent much of his early career as a radical statutory rape apologist and child abuse denier.  It also brings to mind infamous blogger Kyle Payne, who used his identity as a prominant male feminist to land a role as a student counsellor – and to subsequently film himself violating one of his passed out teenage charges when he was still unable to get laid.  The fervent anti-porn activist is now back in prison for fapping off to child pornography whilst on probation.

It’s long been known suspected in the men’s rights community that male feminism is simply an omega male mating strategy for the sexually frustrated.  Add to that the obvious deep-rooted psychological issues that these self-hating, white, middle-class nerds clearly possess, and you have a roll call of tragedies just waiting to play themselves out.

Exile in Gal-Ville : How a Male Feminist Alienated his Supporters

Hugo Schwyzer is Still Doing Harm

http://theantifeminist.com/are-all-male-feminists-sex-predators-paedophiles-or-worse/

 

 

related stuff

 

Feminism As a Mating Strategy Among Beta Males

It only took me a cursory perusal of Google Images to get the strong suspicion that most males get into feminism for the same reason that females do: because they are failures at embodying their gender’s most attractive traits. In other words, females become feminists because they’re failures as women, while men do it because they’re failures as men.

I therefore posit that in at least some cases, male feminism is a mating strategy for men who aren’t getting laid on the virtues of being men alone. So they switch gears and attempt to get laid on the merits of proclaiming to be feminist “allies.” The “allies” thing is all lies. It is a sneaky way of trying to appeal to women by loudly proclaiming that you hate the type of guy who normally appeals to women. I believe the most reasonable explanation for the very existence of the modern “male feminist” is rooted in evolutionary biology: Calling oneself a male feminist is a deceptive and despicable little shame-dance, a pathetic self-puffing mating ritual that beta male lizards do to garner even a scrap of female attention.

Please share this article by using the link below. When you cut and paste an article, Taki’s Magazine misses out on traffic, and our writers don’t get paid for their work. Email editors@takimag.com to buy additional rights. http://takimag.com/article/feminism_as_a_mating_strategy_among_beta_males_jim_goad/print#ixzz3Hm1zvhN6

 

 

 

 

 

by

Christian zealot beheads teen for practicing witchcraft

Christian terror? In a grisly murder an Oklahoma college student with strong Christian beliefs nearly decapitates a young man because the victim practiced witchcraft.

Isaiah Zoar Marin, 21, is charged with first-degree murder for the killing of Jacob Andrew Crockett, 19. Marin is accused of using a “long knife or sword” to kill Crockett.

According to a court affidavit, the suspect, Marin, is described as a “religious zealot” and “heavy drug user.”

The victim, Crockett, is the son of an Oklahoma state trooper.

Police report the victim had what appeared to be multiple deep slash and stab wounds and the “head was mostly severed from his body.”

Marin was watching videos on YouTube “related to his Christian beliefs and the Book of Matthew” before the murder, according to the affidavit.

The document also notes that Marin had feuded with Crockett in the past because the victim was practicing witchcraft.

The defendant’s brother, Samuel Marin, said “in the past Jacob and Isaiah had disagreements” because Jacob had been” practicing witchcraft and Isaiah had strong Christian beliefs,” a Stillwater police officer reported.

Police say the two men were “acquaintances” and Crockett was attending class at Northern Oklahoma College, but was planning to transfer to OSU.

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2014/10/christian-zealot-beheads-teen-for-practicing-witchcraft/

by

Reaction to the Hollaback video another sign that the tide is turning against feminism

by the antifeminist

http://theantifeminist.com/reaction-to-the-hollaback-video-another-sign-that-the-tide-is-turning-against-feminism/

You’re probably all aware of the viral ‘hollaback’ video that purports to show a moderately attractive white woman walking around ethnic areas of New York and smiling smugly as she receives cat calls and compliments from various bums and street punks, nearly all of whom are black. The video lasts for less than 2 minutes – less than 2 minutes of ‘harassment’ out of 10 hours walking around the most economically deprived parts of New York in figure hugging jeans and top, deliberately seeking to provoke reactions from low status males. Only one incident in the video appears to constitute genuine harassment – a soft spoken black male compliments her in the street and when she completely ignores him he allegedly walks silently by her side for two mintues. It’s possible that he did so because he could see that he was being filmed as he clearly looks at the camera even in the edited ‘highlight’ featured in the video.

The video already has 22 million views and has been featured throughout the MSM as an example of how all men are pigs (one article actually used that title). The video was made by the feminist campaign group ‘Hollaback’ which seeks to make it illegal for men to speak to, catcall, or even wink or look lavaciously at a woman in the street.

Despite the video gaining over 20 million views in the space of a few days it appears that the video has attracted so many downvotes that the ratings have been disabled. Not only that, but the comments section is dominated by anti-feminists, with the top comment made by our old friend the PUA ‘Squatting Casanova’ :

There is a fine line between flirting and sexual harassment. And that fine line is called being attractive. HAHAHA?

One thing to note about the video is its disturbing racism. A white (possibly Jewish) New York woman walking around the most economically deprived ethnic areas seeking reactions from low status black males to paint all men as pigs and all women as victims and to justify laws that will criminalize interacting with women in the street (unless you are rich or handsome). The life outcome disparity between white women and black males in the west is the largest of any two groups – from life expectancy to the likelihood of being homeless or incarcerated.

I’ve been thinking about the feminist assumptions behind ‘sexual harassment’ for a while now, and it seems to be a straightforward Sexual Trade Union case of unattractive women victimizing attractive women and shaming/criminalizing low status males in order to raise their own sexual market value. Although there is simple resentment at the attention that more attractive women receive in terms of looks and leers, the primary motivation of feminists is not to stop cat calling per se, but to criminalize pick up artists (who they see as ‘rapists’ for lowering the sexual market value of women and in particular the plain or ugly feminist demographic).

Attractive girls aren’t usually the ones who complain over harassment. Every PUA knows that it is the plain Janes who react to street approaches with the disgusted feelings of harassment, not the hot girls.

Feminists ignore the positive aspects of being an attractive female and ignore the negative aspects of being male (especially a beta male) :

  • Hot women get to passively choose between countless men.
  • Hot women are guarenteed the physical protection of virtually every man in their vicinity – these ‘harassers’ might catcall but they know they would get lynched immediately by other men if they did anything more.
  • Hot women obviously get the attention and desire from men, something which nearly all women spend years of their lives and hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to obtain (attention which is then re-interpreted by feminists as ‘harassment’).
  • Men,on the other hand, have to approach women and face rejection or even being branded as a harasser or creep, and increasingly, arrested and imprisoned under present and future sexual harassment laws. They also risk being attacked by protective boyfriends and husbands, or by white knights if their approaches are clumsy or aggressively rejected by the female.

Feminists also of course ignore the fact that many men can face the same kind of ‘harassment’. A few years ago, I had a competitive bodybuilder’s physique. In the summer months, I would often get females from 11 – 70 making a point of licking their lips at me. I would also get verbal abuse if I didn’t make clear I enjoyed their show of interest, especially from groups of girls who would shout things like ‘wanker’ or ‘shame you’re a ginger’ or an insult based on some other aspect of my appearance if I ignored them.

 

 

by

N.C. Teacher: I Would Kill All Black People If I Had Ten Days To Live

Teacher suspended for alleged racist remarks

 

CAMDEN COUNTY, N.C. (WAVY) – A teacher at Camden County High School is under investigation for allegedly making racist comments in a classroom.

“It is very disturbing,” said parent Kimberley Ashcraft.

Ashcraft told 10 On Your Side the disturbing incident happened a couple weeks ago. Her daughter told her about the conversation with math teacher Cynthia Ramsey.

“That’s when she conveyed to me that Mrs. Ramsey had indicated that if she only had 10 days to live that she would kill all black people,” Ashcraft told WAVY.com.

Ashcraft’s daughter was in Ramsey’s classroom eating lunch. Ashcraft said there were several others students around when Ramsey allegedly made the racist remarks.

“I was completely shocked,” Ashcraft said. “I asked her again, ‘are you sure that was what you heard?’ I could not have imagined a teacher saying that.”

Ramsey is not only a teacher. She’s also head of the math department at the school.

“I conveyed to my daughter that this is a very serious allegation and I need confirmation that this did happen,” Ashcraft said.

School officials began an investigation, and even the Camden County Sheriff’s Office was called in to help. The sheriff told 10 On Your Side several of the students told the same story. Ramsey was placed on suspension with pay, and after a couple days was back in the classroom.

“I was very disappointed to hear that she was back in the classroom so soon,” Ashcraft said.

Superintendent Melvin Hawkins sent 10 On Your Side this statement:

At this point, our main concern is to investigate this incident thoroughly, and collect the facts. This is a personnel issue, and it is confidential until resolved. We are following protocol in this investigation and student and school employee investigations are confidential.

Camden County Sheriff Tony Perry said he has turned over evidence to the district attorney, who will decide if the teacher should face charges.

“As a parent, I felt compelled to come forward and tell somebody, because this was not only in my opinion a direct threat to the black children in the school, but also black people in the community,” Ashcraft said.

10 On Your Side did go by Ramsey’s home, but no one answered the door.

Camden County School officials told 10 On Your Side Ramsey’s case will be discussed by the school board November 13.

 

 

by

Why Men Should Not Go To College

http://www.returnofkings.com/46364/why-men-should-not-go-to-college

1. You will learn absolutely nothing

Outside of math and the hard sciences, most college curricula have zero factual basis. I don’t mean necessarily that everything taught in them is a lie, but rather that there is no objective standard on which they are based. In math and hard sciences such as chemistry, for example, claims made by scholars and professors can be independently proven and verified. In the humanities and soft sciences, you can literally come up with any thesis you want and get away with it so long as you sound convincing.

For example, I once wrote a term paper for an English class contrasting Jimmy Stewart’s character in Vertigo with Cary Grant’s in North by Northwest, arguing that Stewart played an effete beta and Grant a dashing alpha male (I’m dead serious; this was shortly after I discovered Roissy, Roosh and other game blogs).

The problem with the humanities and other liberal arts degrees is that without an objective standard, learning is impossible. If the only metric by which students are judged is how accurately they follow the MLA citation guidelines, they will never learn anything. Not only that, it makes academic fraud ridiculously easy. For example, academic ghostwriting—writing other peoples’ college papers for money—is now a hugeindustry in the U.S., with countless writers earning a living by helping students cheat. If someone who has never even cracked a book on literary criticism can write quality papers for an English class, it means English degrees are worth less than toilet paper.

2. You will put yourself in debt for years, if not decades

Unless your parents are rich or you’ve gotten some quality scholarships, you’re going to have to finance your education by taking out student loans. Thanks to the collapsing economy and the usurious nature of student loans, you’re going to be a debt slave for the better part of your adult life. Because student loans have ridiculous interest rates and cannot be discharged in bankruptcy, they will be an albatross around your neck, keeping you from marrying, having children, buying a house or doing anything worthwhile in life. Even if you luck out and end up with a decent job, your student loan payments will combine with your other expenses to keep you on the hamster wheel for years.

Aaron Clarey said it already in his brilliant book Worthless, but it bears repeating: it’s absolutely insane that we allow 16 and 17-year-olds to make these kinds of decisions. We don’t let them smoke, vote, or drink, yet we allow them to shackle themselves in the chains of debt slavery by letting them major in useless subjects. And when they end up slinging lattes at Starbucks, we scratch our heads and wonder “Hurr durr, how did THIS happen?”

 

3. You will be denigrated every day—and potentially arrested—for being a man

Imagine a black man who willingly puts himself in an environment where he’s called the n-word every day and told he’s an inferior, evil person because of the color of his skin. You’d think he was insane, right? Yet men are still choosing to attend universities where their Marxist, leftist, feminist professors preach hatred against men in general and straight white men in particular. To be a man in college is to be blamed for everything that’s wrong with the world, from poverty to colonialism to environmental degradation. If I wanted to be picked on, I’d go see an insult comic.

You might think that being castigated for your Y chromosome is no big deal, but the rabid anti-male hatred on campuses is starting to have real-world effects. Consider that California’s new “Yes Means Yes” sexual assault law effectively makes every sexually active man enrolled in the state’s universities into a criminal. As attorney Mike Cernovich points out, the arbitrary and poorly-defined concept of “affirmative consent” means that any man can now potentially find himself behind bars for “rape.” With New York Governor Andrew Cuomo recently forcing a version of “Yes Means Yes” on SUNY schools, maleness itself is rapidly becoming illegal on college campuses across the nation.

Not only that, but while your professors and administrators assert themselves as infallible moral authorities, they’re engaging in degeneracy on a level that would make Caligula blush. Beyond professors tearing up political signs they disagree with and helping fabricate “hate crimes,” both they and administrators are complicit in wide-scale academic fraud.

For example, most professors and administrators are well aware that many of their students are going to degree mills and passing in work that is not theirs. They do nothing because if they actually started expelling students for plagiarism (like the college syllabus says they’re supposed to), that would mean fewer tuition dollars for the school and no money to pay their bloated salaries. If you’re too much of a wuss for war, education is a pretty damn good racket.

The only reason to go to college if you have the talent and drive to major in a high-earning, math-centric degree such as computer engineering. Anything else is a waste of your time and money.

 

by

false rape accuser Lena Dunham an admitted incestous sexual predator/Paedophile

This femicunt who falsely accused a GOP politician of rape, wrote in her essays admitted to sexually abusing her little sister.

 

 

 

 

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/lena-dunham-describes-sexually-abusing-her-toddler-sister#.VFIvZB2JNP8.twitter

 

 

In her newly published collection of personal essays, Not That Kind of Girl, Lena Dunham describes experimenting sexually with her younger sister Grace, whom she says she attempted to persuade to kiss her using “anything a sexual predator might do.” In one particularly unsettling passage, Dunham experimented with her six-year younger sister’s vagina. “This was within the spectrum of things I did,” she writes.

In the collection of nonfiction personal accounts, Dunham describes using her little sister at times essentially as a sexual outlet, bribing her to kiss her for prolonged periods and even masturbating while she is in the bed beside her. But perhaps the most disturbing is an account she gives of an episode that occurred when she was seven and her sister was one. Here’s the full passage (p. 158-9):

“Do we all have uteruses?” I asked my mother when I was seven.

“Yes,” she told me. “We’re born with them, and with all our eggs, but they start out very small. And they aren’t ready to make babies until we’re older.” I look at my sister, now a slim, tough one-year-old, and at her tiny belly. I imagined her eggs inside her, like the sack of spider eggs in Charlotte’s Webb, and her uterus, the size of a thimble.

“Does her vagina look like mine?”

“I guess so,” my mother said. “Just smaller.”

One day, as I sat in our driveway in Long Island playing with blocks and buckets, my curiosity got the best of me. Grace was sitting up, babbling and smiling, and I leaned down between her legs and carefully spread open her vagina. She didn’t resist and when I saw what was inside I shrieked.

My mother came running. “Mama, Mama! Grace has something in there!”

My mother didn’t bother asking why I had opened Grace’s vagina. This was within the spectrum of things I did. She just on her knees and looked for herself. It quickly became apparent that Grace had stuffed six or seven pebbles in there. My mother removed them patiently while Grace cackled, thrilled that her prank had been a success.

Dunham describes the book as a “work of nonfiction” in which “some names and identifying details have been changed.” She also states that she considers herself an “unreliable narrator,” which gives her some wiggle room on the truth of her accounts. AsNational Review‘s Kevin D. Williamson notes, this passage is “especially suspicious.” Clearly Grace’s prank is done with the expectation of her older sister “poking around in her genitals. … There is no non-horrific interpretation of this episode.”

 

 

 

more on female pedophiles

 

 

Update:

http://theothermccain.com/2014/10/29/did-pervert-lenadunham-make-her-younger-sister-grace-a-lesbian/

 

Early in the story, we learn that the degenerate young Dunham molested her sister as a child. Then, after reading several hundred more words, we are reminded, “Oh, by the way, that little girl Lena molested? She grew up to be a homosexual.” There is no need for Williamson even to suggest a correlation between these two facts. Anyone who has studied developmental psychology understands it.

 

 

the younger sister is a lesbian inquiring minds would like to know if that is due to the Abuse by admitted freak, pedo and false rape accuser Lena Dunham.

 

 

 

by

Ottawa Police Chief Bordeleau more worried about fictitious “backlash” against Muslim community

On October 22, 2014, shortly after Corporal Nathan Cirillo was killed by a jihadist on Parliament Hill, Ottawa Police Chief Bordeleau sent a message to Muslim leaders in the city to reassure them and invite them to contact the Ottawa Police Service if they fear “backlash.”

Sikander Hashmi, the Imam of the Kanata Muslim Association, acknowledged receiving the message from the Ottawa Police Chief and reproduced it on Twitter (also Archive.Today).

JihadWatch archived Hashmi’s Twitter message and added the following comments:

« The politically correct Ottawa Police Chief seems to have imbibed the lesson well: after every jihad attack, Muslims are the victims, and need special reassurances. Of course, there should be no “backlash” against any innocent people and almost certainly won’t be, but this endless pandering is grotesque. Who is reassuring non-Muslims about keeping them safe from jihad attacks? Who is calling upon Muslim leaders in Canada or anywhere else to back up their condemnations of jihad terror with real action against it, including programs to teach young Muslims to reject that understanding of Islam? »

On August 26, 2010, political correctness also led the Ottawa Police Service and the RCMP to hold a meeting to apologize for arresting Muslims suspected of terrorism during Ramadan.

At the time, both police services were criticized and Prime Minister Harper declared that “There is one law for all Canadians, and no religious group should expect special treatment when it comes to enforcement of the law.”

In July 2014, Hiva Mohammad Alizadeh and Misbahuddin Ahmed, who were arrested during Ramadan 2010, were found guilty on various terrorism charges.

As far as we can tell, the Ottawa Police Service (OPS) has not published the full list of addressees who received Chief Bordeleau’s message. However, it is reasonable to think that the Police Chief sent his message to the Muslim Association of Canada (MAC), the National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM) and others with whom the OPS is engaged in regular “bridge building” and “outreach” activities.

Many Muslim leaders involved in these “bridge building” activities with the Ottawa Police Service lead organizations that are an integral part of the Hamas support network in Canada. On July 16, 2013, Hamas threatened to launch terrorist attacks in countries where Israel embassies are located. These threats are identical to those that incited Martin Ahmad Rouleau and Michael Zehaf-Bibeau to kill Warrant Officer Patrice Vincent in Saint-Jean and Corporal Nathan Cirillo in Ottawa.

The Islamist organizations that are “building bridges” with Chief Bordeleau also frequently invite radical preachers who directly contribute to the radicalization of the Muslim community.

Hamas leaders have frequently advocated the Islamic conquest of the West in the past (2006 – 2008 – 2011 – 2012). In 2011, for example, Hamas leader Mahmoud Al-Zahhar said on TV that Western civilization “will not be able to withstand the great and glorious Islam.”

Hamas is also engaged in the destruction of the state of Israel, of course, as stated in its charter. On the very day that Chief Bordeleau sent a message of support to organizations that have transferred money to Hamas fund collector IRFAN-Canada in the past, a terrorist praised by Hamas rammed his car into a crowd of commuters in Jerusalem, killing a three-month old infant and injuring seven others. By choosing to give legitimacy to the infrastructure that supports Hamas in Canada, Chief Bordeleau is increasing the problem that he should be trying to solve.

 

http://pointdebasculecanada.ca/ottawa-police-bordeleau-fictitious-backlash-muslim-funding-jihad-coming-islamic-org/

 

 

by

Canadian Muslim Leader Plays Victim Card…

The pattern never changes: in the wake of a jihad terror attack or plot, Muslims in the West do not do what they should do: redouble their efforts against jihadis in their own communities, and their cooperation with law enforcement officials. Instead, they claim that they are already cooperating, despite all the evidence to the contrary, and complain that they are being victimized by a “backlash” and try to seize the spotlight as victims. The mainstream media, of course, is all too willing to oblige. Four separate studies since 1998 have shown that 80% of the mosques in the U.S. teach hatred of Jews and Christians and the superiority of Sharia over Constitutional law, and the percentage is likely to be similar in Canada, but no one seems concerned. To be concerned would be “Islamophobic.” Meanwhile, this claim of victimhood is designed to deflect attention away from the jihad murders themselves, and intimidate people into thinking that it would be wrong to pile on to these poor victimized people and demand that they do more to stop the preaching of the Islamic doctrines that incite people to acts of hatred and violence.

 

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/10/canada-muslim-leader-after-jihad-murders-the-main-victims-other-than-the-people-who-died-yesterday-are-muslims-themselves

 

by

Gawker is toxic to brands who partner with them

more fun with Gawker.

 

Who in their right mind would want to risk a brands billion dollar reputation on a publishing house that cheered the Glenn Beck ad boycott, but then talks shit about any brand wants to distance themselves from them? Gawker made their name on the Gawker Stalker, Gawker hoped to bankrupt Chick Fil A over charitable donations. Gawker celebrated when Firefox Chief Brendan Eich was ousted because he too had made donation Gawker did not approve of. Boycotts like this are the results of politicising everything, and now it’s finally come full circle. There’s a reason newspapers had a strict line drawn between editorial and advertising departments, one that now not only has been blurred by native advertising but also the birth of “ad studios” and “featured partner” at the likes of clickbait publications such as Gawker and Buzzfeed, who have spent more energy courting ad agencies than they did chasing down twitter-conversations to report on. Don’t say we didn’t try to warn you.

So while I might have thought “back away slowly” was a good idea a couple of months ago, I now believe your brand has to strike first. Stay on top of this story and see where you are listed as an advertising partner. If your brand is not partnering with said site, have them remove your logo immediately, I’m sure legal can help you write up a decent letter on that. Seek out the next targets before you get dragged into this. Is your brand representing family values & healthy children? Then maybe a site discussing a progressive stance on pedophiles and describing the abuse of a seven year old girl as a “sexual relationship” isn’t a place where your brand wants to be seen?
Read more at http://adland.tv/adnews/gawker-toxic-brands-who-partner-them/1291467968#SbaUFfFbR5rpBczi.99

by

When Gawker Media Staff Had Their Wages Paid by the Advertising of Revenge Child Porn

 

 

http://theantifeminist.com/when-gawker-staff-wages-paid-revenge-child-porn/

 

There was a time when Gawker Media didn’t have to worry about losing advertising from brands such as Adobe over its shameful promotion of bullying (the biggest problem affecting children in the West today). The following is a re-post of an article I published here in 2012. Gawker Media had recently sold ‘Fleshbot.com’- one of the sites in its blog network and the pornographic sister to Jezebel and Gawker. Apparently, it was sold not because it was a profit loss (as a porn site, it was probably making more money than all the other Gawker Media sites combined), but because it sat uncomfortably with the ‘liberal progressive’ feminist ideals that the company promotes. Someone sooner or later was going to point out the sickening double standards. Especially when Fleshbot’s primary source of income appeared to be from running an adult ad network that tempted liberal progressive male feminist readers in with the promise of pornographic images and videos ‘hacked’ from the social network accounts of teenage girls or uploaded by vengeful ex-boyfriends – with some of the girls appearing to be as young as 13.
——————————————————————————————————————–
Gawker Media is being sued for $100 million by Hulk Hogan for publishing a clip of a leaked sex tape featuring himself.

This is the company that owns both Gawker and Jezebel websites, and which led a crusade against two controversial sexually voyeuristic subreddits – namely r/jailbaits and r/creepshots.  Gawker journalist Adrian Chen was the cheerleader for both campaigns, and recently ‘exposed’ the anonymous redditor behind both of those subreddits.  He has repeatedly expressed his desire for r/mensrights to be the next on his target list.

It’s probably too  much to expect that Adrian will resign over the double standards involved in the gross invasion of Hulk Hogan’s sexual privacy. After all, presumably in his White Knight world an unidentified young woman has the right to parade around in semi-naked clothing without being voyeuristically objectified, whereas a male celebrity can have his genitals and private sex life splashed all over the very website the he works for in order for profits to climb and his wages to be paid.  No problem.

However, I don’t know if they’ll be any money left in the piggy bank to pay Adrian’s wages if Gawker has to shell out $100 million to Hogan.

One presumes that Gawker Media were already financially struggling since they were pressured into offloading another of their blog websites – Fleshbot.com – this year.  The adult site was likely the only one in their network that made a substantial profit, but the company apparently decided that housing a hardcore porn site alongside the most popular feminist website online, as well as the morally crusading ‘liberal’ Gawker Magazine, smacked too much of double standards and rank hypocrisy.

Especially when that adult blog made most of its money out of advertising a porn paysite network that includes at least one highly dubious website purporting to offer to subscribing members sexual photos and videos of teenage girls – some of whom appear to be underage- illegally hacked from their social networks.

 

more at http://theantifeminist.com/when-gawker-staff-wages-paid-revenge-child-porn/