Feminism Faces Reckoning for Aiding and Abetting Sexual Predators

Updated By Julie Roys | 

With a rash of sexual harassment allegations against them, powerful men like Harvey Weinstein, Al Franken, and Roy Moore are facing a day of reckoning. Ironically, so is feminism – a movement that claims to fight for women’s rights, but clearly has done a miserable job living up to its own billing.

As social critic Caitlin Flanagan recently argued in a scathing piece in the Atlantic, feminism betrayed women in the 1990s when it chose to defend Bill Clinton rather than the victims of his alleged sexual harassment, assault and rape. Now, women are finally realizing that feminism is not the great champion of women. It is, as Flanagan noted, “a weaponized auxiliary of the Democratic Party,” willing to sacrifice its dubious principles on the altar of political expediency.

When news of Bill Clinton’s alleged sexual misconduct with young intern Monica Lewinsky first surfaced, Betty Friedan, the woman credited with launching second-wave feminism, said: “Whether it’s a fantasy, a set-up, or true, I simply don’t care . . . Clinton has started the national childcare policy, and appointed some very strong women. He has also stood firm on abortion.”

Similarly, feminist writer Nina Burleigh crudely declared that she not only was willing to overlook Clinton’s predatory ways, she’d actually perform a sex act on Clinton “just to thank him for keeping abortion legal.”

But perhaps the greatest betrayal of women came in the form of a 1998 New York Times editorial written by feminist icon Gloria Steinem. In it, she grossly minimized Clinton’s misdeeds, claiming that his alleged groping of Kathleen Willey (whom Steinem curiously noted was “old enough to be Lewinsky’s mother”) was not sexual harassment, but merely “a gross, dumb, and reckless pass.”

She also characterized as a “pass” Clinton’s alleged groping and indecent exposure of himself to Paula Jones in a hotel room. “Even if the allegations are true,” Steinem wrote, “the President is not guilty of sexual harassment,” but merely a “candidate for sex addiction therapy.”

Gloria Steinem’s defense of Clinton was “one of the most regretted public actions of her life,” Flanagan wrote. Steinem’s piece in the New York Times “slut-shamed, victim-blamed, and aged shamed,” and urged “compassion for and gratitude to the man the women accused.”

Yet even now, Steinem is not apologizing for what she did. Neither is celebrated feminist Hillary Clinton, who reportedly tried to silence Bill’s victims, including Juanita Broaddrick, the woman he allegedly raped in 1978.

In the 1990s and subsequent decades, feminism revealed itself to be shockingly Machiavellian. At a critical time, when the nation’s attention was trained on the plight of women exploited by a powerful man, feminism essentially told female victims to suck it up and move on. Is it any wonder that women like actress Natalie Portman have been rendered numb to the sexual harassment they’ve routinely endured?

Portman recently disclosed that when the allegations against Weinstein first surfaced, she thought, “Wow, I’m so lucky that I haven’t had this.” Then on further reflection she realized she’s been the victim of sexual harassment a hundred times, but had learned to dismiss it as “part of the process.” “I’ve had discrimination or harassment on almost everything I’ve ever worked on in some way,” she said.

Feminism also told powerful predators like Bill Clinton that if they support liberal causes, they can have their way with women and feminists will have their back. Is it any wonder that the Harvey Weinsteins of this world took this message and ran with it?

Let’s face it. We’re in this current cultural moment because of feminists, not in spite of them!

But it’s not just feminists’ protection of predators that has contributed to the epidemic of sexual harassment and abuse in this country. The entire ideology of feminism renders women as tools for men.

Take their keystone political platform – abortion. What is abortion other than a get-out-of-sex-free card for men, absolving them of any responsibility for their actions? Feminists continue to champion abortion like it’s an essential means of liberation for women, but nothing could be further from the truth.

Women don’t want abortions; men do. In fact, a study reported in the Medical Science Monitor found that 64-percent of women who abort feel pressured to do so. Similarly, Frederica Matthewes-Green, who talked to hundreds of women about their decision to abort for her book, Real Choices, found that women aren’t having abortions because they are poor, or because a child would interfere with school or career plans. They’re having abortions because the men in their lives tell them to do so.

Matthewes-Green reported that 88-percent of the women she interviewed said their trip to the abortion clinic was not a choice, but a capitulation. They didn’t feel empowered; they felt isolated, overwhelmed and sad.

“No woman wants an abortion as she wants an ice cream cone or a Porsche,” Matthewes-Green concluded. “She wants an abortion as an animal caught in a trap wants to gnaw off its own leg.”

Yet abortion remains enshrined as the holy grail of feminism. The National Organization of Women (NOW) names so-called “reproductive justice” as one of its five main campaigns. Reproductive Rights is also cited as one of the Women’s March main “unity principles.”

Feminism’s commitment to abortion is downright fanatical. As one of Hillary Clinton’s biographers, Dr. Paul Kengor, once wrote, “(Abortion) is Hillary’s hill to die on. I believe Hillary Clinton would give her life for Roe v. Wade.”

Abortion is necessary to achieve feminism’s goal of making women the functional equivalents of men. But women aren’t the functional equivalents of men. Perhaps someone should inform feminists that women have a womb; we nurse babies; and we’d prefer to have our unique maternal functions protected, rather than obliterated.

We’d also prefer feminists to call predatory men to account – not just the Bill Clintons and Harvey Weinsteins, but the “Alexes” and “Martys.” These are the guys who bragged to a Vanity Fair reporter about their “Tinderellas,” the dozens of girls they’ve slept with and discarded after finding them on dating apps like Tinder and Hinge.

Feminists should be up in arms over the wanton abuse of women inherent in the current hookup culture; instead so-called “third-wave” feminists are actually promoting it.

These “sex-positive” or “porn-positive” feminists are so deceived that they actually think freely prostituting one’s body is somehow in women’s best interests. Heavily influenced by the message of the sexual revolution, these daughters of second-wave feminists believe sexual freedom is essential to women’s freedom and, as a result, oppose controlling or limiting sex in any way.

Sadly, their errant ideology is killing them. As a female student at Boston College told Vanity Fair, “Sex should stem from emotional intimacy, and it’s the opposite with us right now, and I think it really is kind of destroying females’ self-images.” Her classmate agreed and added, “But if you say any of this out loud, it’s like you’re weak, you’re not independent, you somehow missed the whole memo about third-wave feminism.”

Unfortunately, men haven’t missed the memo on third-wave feminism. They’ve hopped on it just as gleefully as Weinstein would on a hot actress. But it’s sick and perverse and horribly misogynistic. And it’s about time women, and those who love them, begin saying so.

And to those conservatives, who like Friedan and Steinem are saying they don’t care if Roy Moore is guilty of molesting young women: as long as he’s pro-life, they’ll vote for him. May history deal with you every bit as harshly as it is dealing with Friedan and Steinem today.

Conservatives care about conserving timeless principles. But if you are willing to sacrifice the principle of protecting women and children for political gain, you are not a conservative; you are a grotesque pragmatist. Your day of reckoning should not be any less severe than those in whose footsteps you are walking.

But for the rest of us, let’s make today a day of reckoning for feminism and reject it once and for all. And instead, let’s embrace God’s vision for womanhood – one that honors and values women as women, and refuses to use them as tools, but instead protects and cherishes them.



Toronto Police probe ‘anti-Semitic’ music video played at Al Quds Day rally

Toronto police are investigating a video that shows music being played at this summer’s Al Quds Day rally at Queen’s Park that calls for Jews to be stabbed, attacked and beheaded.

The video shows signs scattered on ground, men in reflective vests standing and walking around the grounds and, in the background, a song plays glorifying violence against Jews.

The translated lyrics to the song, Declare It A Popular Revolution, in part say “With a Palestinian woman (armed with a knife) we defeated them”… “fill (the bottle) to the top with gasoline, and snatch from him the M-16”…“stab whoever you see, five, six, ten, twelve.”

“Declare a popular revolution,” the lyrics continue… “Make us happy with bombing the bus” and then “cut off (their heads), stab (them), run over (them), launch an attack on them.”

Toronto Police spokesman Mark Pugash confirmed “officers met with the complainants yesterday (Tuesday) and now the matter will be investigated.”


Toronto Police probe ‘anti-Semitic’ music video played at Al Quds Day rally

The Insane Professor



Griffin Epstein teaches at George Brown College in Toronto. In 2009, she wrote her master’s thesis on “mad Jewish identity,” which began:

“Can we be accountable to privilege? Can we find a space for coherent anti-racist secular Ashkenazi Jewish identity in North America, where Jews have been deeply implicated in structural violence? Can we be agents of both complicity and change?”

This 200-page “autoethnographic” treatise is crazy on steroids. That someone could obtain a graduate degree on the basis of such work is damning testimony to the abysmal standards of contemporary academia.

Professor Epstein attracted public attention after she published a letter in the Toronto Star, criticizing the newspaper’s coverage of a controversy at Wilfrid Laurier University:

“Instead of taking a stand against hate speech, you have given dangerous credence to the views of (University of Toronto Prof.) Jordan Peterson and his supporters, flying in the face of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.”

This controversy involves people demanding to be called by gender-neutral pronouns. Lindsey Shepherd, a teaching assistant at Wilfrid Laurier University, showed her students a video of a debate between University of Toronto psychology professor Jordan B. Peterson and Nicholas Matte, a professor in the Waterloo University women’s studies department. Peterson has become “controversial” for refusing to address students by such pronouns as “they/them” or “ze/zir.” Shepherd said she was told “that you can’t debate something like this because it causes an unsafe or toxic learning environment. I ended up being called transphobic and someone who causes harm and violence.” If you don’t do whatever transgender activists demand, you’re Hitler, basically.

When Professor Epstein weighed in on the controversy — condemning Peterson, Shepherd and the Toronto Star as proponents of “hate speech” — Badger Pundit posted a Twitter thread with excerpts from Professor Epstein’s master’s thesis, full of startling revelations. Professor Epstein is mentally ill — diagnosed with anorexia, major depression, generalized anxiety disorder and PTSD — and her “autoethnography” reveals that mental illness runs in her family. (Her uncle Larry was treated by Bruno Bettelheim.) Her master’s thesis includes statements like these:

“As a queer person who has been psychiatrized . . . the marginality that I have experienced has always been experienced in this landscape of privilege. . . .My version of secular North American Ashkenazi Jewishness was stripped to its barest component part: memory. . . . When I renounced Judaism at fourteen, weeks after my rush-job Bat Mitzvah, my mother’s devastation did not arise from my refusal of God, but a refusal to raise my hypothetical kids with the ghostly memory.”


Question: Should mentally ill people be teaching at universities?

Readers will recall that the notorious Deb Frisch was once a tenure-track psychology professor at the University of Oregon. Isn’t it important to keep such lunatics away from impressionable young people? Do we really want nutjobs and wackos teaching our youth? University faculties are beginning to resemble a casting call for a remake of The Rocky Horror Picture Show or One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest.




Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical left and Islamic terrorism.

“On the shores of her Cambridge mansion, by the shining Charles River waters, stood Elizabeth Warren, pointing with her finger at the White House.”
The Song of Warrenwatha

Senator Elizabeth Warren, America’s greatest living fake Indian, is outraged.

“There he was, at a ceremony to honor Native Americans,” the former Harvard Law prof, who claimed to be Native American on account of her grandfather’s high cheekbones, fumed, “And President Trump couldn’t even make it through a ceremony to honor these men without throwing in a racial slur.”

The “racial slur” was calling a woman who is as Indian as the pilgrims, Pocahontas.

Taunting an American Indian that way might be a racial slur. Taunting Warren that way doesn’t insult her race. The millionaire former asbestos lawyer is as white as cottage cheese. It insults her character. It reminds everyone that Warren is as much a fighter for the “little guy” as she was a Cherokee.

The Senator from the High Cheekbones Tribe of Harvard isn’t just a fake Indian. She’s a fake class warfare activist.

And a fake everything.

Warren was a Republican before she turned Socialist. Before she was fighting corporations, she was helping corporations deny compensation to asbestos victims. And before she was protesting the high cost of education, Harvard Law was paying her $350,000 to teach a single course. A multinational corporation owned by billionaires then gave her a $525,000 advance to tell her tale of rising from “poverty” to fight for ordinary people who don’t get their own chair funded by Wall Street lawyers.

It would take a heart of stone not to make Pocahontas jokes about a blue-eyed scam artist so shameless she passed herself off as Harvard Law School’s “first woman of color.” A grifter whose campaign tried to prove she was really Indian by citing the work of her cousin who wrote the ‘Pow Wow Chow’ cookbook containing such authentic Indian recipes as Cold Omelets with Crab Meat and Mexican Oatmeal Soup.

Unfortunately the Cold Omelets with Crab Meat recipe turned out to be plagiarized from the braves of the New York Times. Warren’s Cherokee claims are as fake as her outrage over being exposed as a liar.

There’s only one racist in this story. It’s Elizabeth Warren.

Calling her out for appropriating an oppressed group’s minority status for affirmative action so she could kickstart her career helping big corporations rip off the “little guy”, before switching to a Senate career promising to protect the “little guy” from people like her former employers, isn’t racism.

It’s fighting racism.

When the scandal broke, Senator Warren could have apologized to the Cherokee Nation. Instead she trotted out her grandfather’s “high cheekbones”, an imaginary document proving she was 1/32 Cherokee which turned out not to exist and Pow Wow Chow’s Mexican soup.

It’s almost as painful as watching her leftist colleague, Senator Franken claim that he unintentionally groped women because he’s just a people person. The only thing more awkward is the Washington Post’s desperate explainer, “Trump’s racist ‘Pocahontas’ reference really has nothing to do with Elizabeth Warren.” The only possible way the reference could be racist would be if it had nothing to do with Warren. However since Trump was referring to Warren, POTUS and reality trump the Post.

The simple and awkward truth is that Senator Elizabeth Warren lied. There, was that so hard?

Just last week, Dems were celebrating how good it felt to finally admit that Bill Clinton was a rapist. But almost as soon as they experienced that liberating moment of truth, they had to call Congressman Conyers an icon (a civil rights icon who can’t keep his pants on or his hands to himself) while helping Senator Franken figure out what the exact definition of ‘grope” is.

Will it really take them another twenty years to admit that Senator Warren is as Indian as Iron Eyes Cody, Oscar de Corti, the famous Crying Indian in the anti-pollution Earth Day ads? Oscar also claimed to be Cherokee. And he proved it by wearing headdresses and moccasins everywhere. His actual tribe hailed from the environs of Sicily. The tear in the Earth Day ad was glycerin. Earth Day was also a fraud.

The left loves its fake Indians. If you’re a white guy or girl, trade your privilege for instant authenticity by finding your own Pow Wow Chow cookbook. Just ask Ward “Little Eichmanns” Churchill who, like Warren, got his academic gig with a little affirmative action grease, or Jamake Highwater, who was all over PBS and college reading lists, whose parents were  not Cherokee, but Jewish Los Angelinos.

But come hell or highwater, the left will stand by Elizabeth ‘Iron Lies’ Warren.

Why protect Pocahontas from her own lies? Because Senator Warren didn’t just lie about her ancestry. She lied and lies about everything. The CFPB was never anything but a shifty leftist enclave. It was racist, illegal, unconstitutional and secretive. And, like everything Warren does, it was about power and profit.

There’s the myth of Fauxcahontas. And there’s the reality.

The Warren myth is that she’s courageous. The truth is that she’s a self-serving coward. Take her recent willingness to admit that the Dem primaries were “rigged”. It took her all of six days to walk it back.

Or take her entire career as an advocate for whoever would pay her the most.

These days, it’s the left.

Senator Warren will play a Cherokee or a consumer advocate if there’s enough money in it.

She claimed that she had tried to pass as a minority in academia so that she “would be invited to a luncheon a group something with people who are like I am”.

Sadly, Rachel Dolezal, Iron Eyes Cody and Ja Du never got the invitation.

“Being Native American has been part of my story, I guess, since the day I was born,” Warren claimed. Except that no one had ever heard of any such nonsense from her until law school.

Or, as Iron Eyes Cody’s sister said, “The next thing we heard was that he had turned Indian.”

Then, just as expediently, Warren ceased to be a member of the High Cheekbones Tribe of Harvard.

At least, Iron Eyes Cody had the decency to stick with his shtick instead of going back to being a white man the moment a juicy part in the Godfather came along. That’s more than you can say for Liz’s summer Indian routine. Headdress off and on is somehow more contemptuously racist.

The Cherokee, like everyone else, were nothing more than suckers for Warren to lie about and exploit. The best way to fight Senator Warren’s racism is to mock her pretensions by calling her, “Pocahontas”.

Trump isn’t hurling a racial slur at a white leftist liar. He’s exposing a racist.

Why is the left so outraged that President Trump called Senator Warren, “Pocahontas”? Forget about the “racial slur” nonsense.  When your defense is, “Trump’s racist ‘Pocahontas’ reference really has nothing to do with Elizabeth Warren,” that really means it has nothing to do with racism.

And everything to do with Elizabeth Warren.

Let’s flash back to that last election where Trump trounced an unlikable prim lefty activist who couldn’t stop compensating for her own boring identity by making up stories about the time she negotiated peace in Northern Ireland, tried to join NASA and the Marines, and landed at an airport under fire.

A big chunk of the left wants Warren to run in 2020. So does Trump. He wouldn’t even need a new game plan because Elizabeth Warren is Hillary Clinton. There are the shady financial dealings, the stiff interviews, the flip-flopping, the missing sense of humor, the shameless greed and the compulsive lying.

The left is terrified of a second Trump term. And it’s terrified that its next Trump-killer candidate will just be Hillary again. Trump’s ‘Pocahontas’ attacks play into that fear. And paradoxically make it more likely.

But one thing you can say for Hillary Clinton, at least she never claimed to be Cherokee.

Funds needed to build shelter for men facing domestic violence



“I got to a place where I was fearing for my life and I didn’t know how to get out of it.”

It’s a statement most of us would attribute to a woman when hearing about a domestic violence situation. Not a burly, broad-shouldered man some of us would move out of the way to let pass on a crowded sidewalk.

“I get that a lot actually. It’s just my nature. I’m not the type of person who would defend myself or hit another person. It was the darkest time of my life. I literally didn’t know what to do next.”

Michael Healey says he spent five years in a mentally and physically abusive relationship with a woman who first began throwing small things at him “like paper and posted notes and then that progressed to heavier objects which were being thrown at me.”

The violence continued to escalate to hitting and punching then to “brandishing a weapon.”

When his partner pointed a knife in his direction, Healey knew he had to find the strength to leave.

“It was the darkest time in my life.”

Over a five year period, a 2014 Statistics Canada report found that an equal percentage of men and women reported being victims of spousal violence across the county. Though when Healey called out for help, he found there were limited places for men and no support services available to help men fleeing a violent relationship.

It’s a gap in the system, says Justin Trottier who is the executive director for the Canadian Centre of Men and Families. And it’s a gap he is trying to close.

“Single men can, of course, go to a homeless shelter, but they don’t get the support they would were they women going to a violence against women shelter,” he said. “Those violence against woman shelters are critically important for women in abuse situations. They have legal services, they have trauma counselling, they have emergency support.”

Trottier is clear, this isn’t about “men versus women.” He feels more resources are needed for all genders fleeing traumatic relationships. His hope is to close the resource gap for men and men with children, by raising funds to open a first of its kind shelter in a major North American city by mid 2018.

“These big centres, these big population centres where there’s thousands and thousands of men and women dealing with domestic violence there’s not a single family shelter for abused men and their children in these population centres,” he said. “Toronto could be the first and, of course, the hope is others would follow the lead.”

The goal is to raise $300,000, currently $175,000 has been raised. The hope is a ‘Go Fund Me’ campaign which has been launched will help Canadian Centre of Men and Families reach their goal. Each dollar publicly donated is being matched by a private donor.

For Michael Healey his hope is a shelter for men and their children will also help lift the stigma and backlash he received when he reached out for help.

“I received responses that were on the verge of hostile. I was told I was the perpetrator. Men hear those stories and they fear that’s what will happen and then it becomes very difficult for them to leave their situation.”


Former employees claim Toronto restaurant owes thousands in unpaid wages

Former employees of the Green Republic Food Co. claim they’re short thousands of dollars in unpaid wages from the popular downtown Toronto lunch spot.

Former kitchen manager Simon Cheung, along with staffers Stephanie Levi and Nathalie Mattson, claim they’re owed a total of about $4,700. And they say the restaurant has had long-running issues with paying employees on time, if at all.

“It’s not just me but employees I’ve hired,” Cheung said. “Everybody has had pay issues.”

According to the former staffers, the point person for payment is Abdi Ghotb, Green Republic’s chef and consultant.

The restaurant’s publicist Kam Chuhan said the company has paid everyone in full and has financial statements to prove it.

Green Republic failed to produce the documents as requested.

Ontario’s Ministry of Labour confirmed two claims have been filed against Green Republic — on Aug. 24 and Oct. 11 — for a total of around $3,000.

It could be months before the ministry decides whether to prosecute. If the restaurant is found guilty, the maximum penalty is a $50,000 fine and/or 12 months in jail.

Cheung said he received a quarter of what he’s owed Tuesday afternoon. Mattson said she still hasn’t received any funds from the company.

Ghotb was not available for comment.



Pakistani-American Muslims call for restrictions against ‘non-Muslims’

Pakistan born Islamic cleric Rafiq Khan defined America as “The land of Infidels” at a fundraiser for his Islamic charity this Saturday. The event which was held at a Holiday Inn in Springfield, Virginia attracted over 100 participants. Speakers included an Islamist from Pakistan as well as radical Imams from the states of Maryland, Virginia, and Texas. The conference revolved around the topics of Jihad, Infidels and what can the American Muslim community do to counter conspiracies against Islam.

We went undercover to report on the day-long event which was organized by two U.S. registered charities, Idara Dawat-O-Irshad and Khatme Nubuwwat Center, both of which enjoy IRS tax-exempt status.


The registration desk which was manned by teenagers displayed flyers and posters denouncing the founder of the moderate Ahmadiyya Islamic sect. An exhibition stall lined with posters urged Muslim voters to not vote for “non-Muslim candidates”. The event particularly targeted the Ahmadis who are considered heretic by the majority of mainstream Muslims as they believe in another Prophet after Prophet Muhammad and have a different understanding of Jihad. Many of the conference speakers accused the Ahmadis of being ‘Infidels’ and criticized them for having ‘abolished Jihad’.


The event’s keynote speaker was Habib-ur-Rehman Ludhianvi, a visiting Islamic cleric from Pakistan. In a 2016 piece, Ludhianvi who serves as the editor of monthly Millia magazine claimed that America was behind the assassination of former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto.

Ludhianavi, who is also the principal of the Islamic seminary Dar-ul-Uloom located in the Pakistani city of Faisalabad claimed that ‘ignorant Infidels’ need to be dealt with force, He said:

“They are ignorant and there is no need for dialogue with them, God has given them two options, one is the holy book and one is the stick [Force] and if one does not accept the holy book they have to be forced”


He also urged American Muslim Lawyers to use the American Justice system to restrict the religious freedom of Ahmadis:

“Have all Muslim lawyers died, why cant they learn and understand U.S. laws and then go present their case in front of the judge and explain that Qadianis [Ahmadis] are disrespecting Islam……..Islam is our faith and they [Ahmadis] are portraying their religious beliefs as Islamic beliefs ……. it should be made criminal for them to do so”

He also urged American Muslim Lawyers to use the American Justice system to restrict the religious freedom of Ahmadis:

“Have all Muslim lawyers died, why cant they learn and understand U.S. laws and then go present their case in front of the judge and explain that Qadianis [Ahmadis] are disrespecting Islam……..Islam is our faith and they [Ahmadis] are portraying their religious beliefs as Islamic beliefs ……. it should be made criminal for them to do so”

Another Islamic cleric, Usman Ahsan, a graduate of Dar-ul-Uloom, a Canadian Islamic seminary declared that claiming to be a Prophet after Muhammad was “enough to wage war” against them.

Pakistani cleric Ludhanvi repeated Ahsan’s comments and said that:

“those who claimed prophethood after Prophet Muhammad were not only given death sentences by were actually killed”

Similar comments were made by Mufti Qareeb ur Rehman, an American Imam who graduated from Pakistan’s Jamia Binoria Karachi, an Islamic seminary with ties to extremist groups. Rehman currently serves as an Imam at the Manassas Muslim Association.

Another Jamia Binoria graduate, Imam Shazad Hussain of Springfield’s ‘Noor Mosque’ claimed that the minority Ahmadis conspired with the British to stop Muslims from ‘fighting Jihad and committing bloodshed’.

Imam Shazad Hussain further added that:

We are not going to support any [peace] initiatives of people who have fallen out of the fold of Islam

The Jamia Binoria seminary is the source of many extreme Islamic teachings which include support for Suicide attacks and the death penalty for apostates. Other Fatwas issued by Jamia Binoria include:

Support for Jihad [against Americans] in Afghanistan & Iraq
Wishing Merry Christmas to Christians is prohibited
Yoga is Haram [forbidden]

Event moderator Omar F. Khan, who is a teacher at the ‘Idara Dawat-O-Irshad’ charity went to great lengths to explain why Shiites Muslims were also “Infidels”.

During a Question and Answer session, Pakistani speaker Habib-ur-Rehman Ludhianvi warned the U.S. Government to “stop giving refuge to the adherents of the Qadiani faith [Ahmadis]” who he claimed were worse than Jews & Christians.

The conference ended with organizers urging the attendees to donate $100 each to pay for the expenses of the “cause”. The organizers also thanked the “Karahi Kabob” restaurant owner for providing free food to the conference attendees.


Germany: Muslim migrants destroy their free housing, repairs will cost $23,000

The place must not have been nice enough for them, and so they made the Infidels know their displeasure. They no doubt considered this free housing to be her due, in lieu of the jizya that the Qur’an says that Muslims should collect from subjugated non-Muslim People of the Book. In Islamic law, it is the place of non-Muslims to turn over their funds to the Muslims.

“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued” (Qur’an 9:29).

The caliph Umar said the jizya payments from the dhimmis were the source of the Muslims’ livelihood:

“Narrated Juwairiya bin Qudama at-Tamimi: We said to `Umar bin Al-Khattab, ‘O Chief of the believers! Advise us.’ He said, ‘I advise you to fulfill Allah’s Convention (made with the Dhimmis) as it is the convention of your Prophet and the source of the livelihood of your dependents (i.e. the taxes from the Dhimmis.)’” (Bukhari 4.53.388)


“Afghan refugees ‘thank’ Germany for its hospitality and destroy their accommodation,” Voice of Europe, November 20, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

Four young Afghans were unhappy with their free housing in the German village of Falkenfels.

The guests from Afghanistan decided to destroy their accommodation with chains and wood laths. They fled when the police arrived and during their attempt they destroyed the windshield of a police car as well.

Inhabitants of the village said they didn’t feel safe anymore and a crisis summit was organised to find a solution for the civil unrest.

The rioters were four youths of 15 and 16 years old from Afghanistan. Several police officers were needed to arrest them in a forest nearby. It was decided that three leaders of the group will not return to the accommodation.

Estimated costs of the repairs are 20,000 euros according to police….



Warn parents about the danger of pot to young brains: pediatricians

Warn parents about the danger of pot to young brains: pediatricians


The legalization of cannabis will expose many children and adolescents to the drug and parents need to be told about the damage it can cause to developing brains, a pediatricians’ group says.

Dr. Hirotaka Yamashiro, president of the Pediatricians alliance  of Ontario, said a major hospital in Colorado saw a spike in children arriving in the emergency room with signs of marijuana use and exposure after legalization.

“In our opinion, Ontario is not ready to deal with the risk that it poses to our children,” the Richmond Hill pediatrician said Friday. “We can be certain that after next July 1 many more young people in Ontario will be exposed to marijuana.”

The Canadian government plans to legalize recreational cannabis by July 2018 and Ontario is setting up government-run stores to sell the product.

Dr. Sharon Burey, a behavioral pediatrician from Windsor and PAO’s vice-president, said a poll in 2010 found one-third of Canadian youngsters had tried pot at least once by age 15 — the highest percentage of any of the 43 countries surveyed.

In her own practice, Burey said she has treated a 13-year-old boy who was using cannabis every day and whose father wanted her to prescribe his son medical marijuana to deal with his behavioural issues.

“I’m even receiving consultations for children as young as four years of age who have been prescribed medical marijuana for conditions like Oppositional Defiant Disorder, Communication Disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorder (and) Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder,” she said. “There have been no guidelines set for the use of medical marijuana in children with these conditions.”

Chronic marijuana use in young people has been linked to long-lasting serious mental health disorders, she said.

The pediatrician’s group fears children and teens across the city will be exposed to pot as their parents bring home the newly-legalized product.

PAO is asking that governments launch a public education campaign to warn parents about the risks to their children.

The pediatricians also want the government to fund ongoing research into the effects of marijuana exposure on young people.

Protecting the health and well-being of all Ontarians, especially children, youth, young adults and other vulnerable populations, is central to Ontario’s safe and sensible approach to federal cannabis legalization.

Laura Gallant, a spokesperson for Health Minister Dr. Eric Hoskins, said the Minister views public education as a critical part of the province’s cannabis framework.

The federal government has announced intentions to invest in public education and Ontario will focus its efforts on raising awareness about provincial rules.

“As part of this work, Ontario will engage in public education efforts to ensure families and their children are equipped with the resources needed to support conversations about cannabis use so that every Ontarian and, most importantly, every young person can make informed and healthy choices,” Gallant said.

Ontario is also developing a prevention and harm reduction strategy that includes training for health care professionals to delay and prevent cannabis use in young people, she said.

Canada: Trudeau government refers to returning jihadis as “foreign terrorist travelers”

“Foreign terrorist travellers” will be given “reintegration support.”

That means that the Trudeau government will shower money upon them, in the mistaken assumption that poverty and lack of economic opportunity that cause terrorism. Then they will be shocked, shocked!, when some of these men return to jihad anyway.

In reality, these jihadis are enemy combatants. They joined an entity that is avowedly at war with Canada, and has called for jihad massacres on Canadian soil. They should not be allowed back in.

“PATHETIC: Trudeau Government Calls Jihadis ‘Returning Foreign Terrorist Travellers,’” Spencer Fernando, November 17, 2017 (thanks to Blazing Cat Fur):

…Here’s what Trudeau government spokesman said Dan Brien (obviously using PMO approved talking points), when asked about Canada’s policies on ISIS fighters coming back to the country:

“Returning foreign terrorist travellers and their families, specifically women and children, require the appropriate disengagement and reintegration support.”

While the “reintegration support,” is the most disturbing part, the fact that the government is trying to “rebrand” dangerous Jihadis as “returning foreign terrorist travellers” is absurd.

This is disgracefully manipulative wording by the Trudeau government. These people weren’t sightseeing in a place terrorism happened to occur. They were actively fighting on behalf of a brutal terrorist organization.

It unfortunately fits with a troubling pattern of the Trudeau government prioritizing political correctness above all else, and seeking to downplay what is a real threat to the Canadian people. After all, other countries are trying to eliminate Jihadis before they can return, while the Trudeau government seems most worried about sounding “nice.”…