Kataluna Enriquez, a biological male who identifies as a woman, has been crowned Miss Silver State USA, which is described as the “biggest preliminary competition for the Miss Nevada USA pageant.”
Enriquez bested the biological females in the competition, putting him in the position to compete for the state’s competition, Miss Nevada USA, with hopes of competing in the bigger contests, Miss USA and Miss Universe.
“Miss Silver State was a great experience,” Enriquez told local outlet FOX 5, describing it as a “celebration of womanhood and diversity and this celebration of being your true self.”
Enriquez detailed his experiences competing in other pageants outside of the state, one of which asked for documents from a doctor. The competitor described the request as “invasive.”
“It brought me back to time where I felt like I was not welcome,” Enriquez said as the outlet noted that he was not assigned a roommate by the competition, which Enriquez declined to name out of fear of retribution:
Enriquez said she understands change doesn’t come easily and some beauty pageants may not be ready for transgender title holders. FOX5 looked at the rules of the pageant Enriquez said discriminated against her and nowhere do they say competitors must be born biologically female.
“I have a great feeling about Nevada … I am looking forward to it,” Enriquez added.
The news comes as Democrats continue to pursue the Equality Act, which effectively changes the legal recognition of sex in favor of gender identity, opening the doors for biological males to compete in women’s competitions and operate in traditionally single-sex spaces, such as locker rooms and homeless shelters.
Glamour magazine recently included a biological male in this year’s Women of the Year awards, identifying transgender model and activist Munroe Berdorf as a “gamechanging influencer
Glamour magazine has chosen its women of the year!
Can you guess what comes next…? pic.twitter.com/qeJXQe5CBK
— Lily Maynard (@LilyLilyMaynard) March 12, 2021
The jihad-funding state of Qatar was portrayed as a “terrorist state” in The Misfits, a new Hollywood film that an Emirati film company co-produced. Al Jazeera — the notorious international news channel based in Doha and funded by the Qatari government — featured reactions from various Islamic authorities, who denounced the movie as “immoral” and “absurd.” joining the pro-jihad critics were Leftist media activists, who have been working hard to damage the film’s reception by means of vigorous criticism. The activist media rushed to the defense of Islam:
- According to the New York Times, The Misfits is “insulting to Arabic dialects and the Muslim Brotherhood” and “inarguably awful, its grandiose muddle of a plot unimproved by bored camels and barely clothed women.”
- Hollywood Insider described The Misfits as having “a few attractive criminals”; the film’s authors “threw them in the Middle East, and wrote jokes with a poor taste of terrorism and stereotypes.” The criticism did not include any real information to back its claims.
- Variety says that in The Misfits, “the action is slick, if strangely outdated, in this miscalculated curiosity, which finds half a dozen criminals breaking into a Middle Eastern prison.” In reality, the film’s subject matter couldn’t be more timely, given the UAE’s normalization with Israel and distancing itself from normative jihad violence.
- Similarly, Slight Magazine described The Misfits as a “refreshing” but “flighty film” which “remains defiantly ignorant of the world in which it exists.” Slight Magazine also says that the movie is “ignorant” of its topic.
- Indie Wire described it as “a low-rent slog peppered with racism in lieu of any other flavoring.”
Doha News, like Al Jazeera, focused on the UAE’s involvement in the film:
“The Misfits” is alleged to be yet another Emirati attempt to portray Qatar as a terrorist state and a global financier of terrorism, prominent journalists have claimed.
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) funded film, which is co-produced, filmed, and financed by the Emirati owned independent film production company FilmGate Production, in partnership with Paramount Pictures and Highland Film Group.
According to Al Jazeera, Qatari scholar Muhammad al-Kubaisi was furious. After saying “May God never bless the Emirati leadership,” al-Kubaisi added:
“I do not know why exactly the UAE wants to damage Qatar’s reputation? Is it because we are Muslims and united with God and it wants to eliminate Islam and Muslims? Does the UAE want to distance Qatar from the essence of Islam and support of Muslims everywhere?”
The activist Leftist media continue to rush to the aid of Islamic supremacists and jihadists everywhere. In the case of this movie, the media criticism falls short, amounting to little more than that the film defied the standards of “wokeness.” The conflict between the Islamic and Western worlds has never been about “race” or “discrimination,” as the “woke” claim. It is about Islam. Qatar is an invasive, jihad-funding terrorist state.
“UAE-produced film slammed for depicting Qatar a ‘terrorist state,’” Al Jazeera, June 23, 2021:
A Hollywood film co-produced by an Emirati film company has been condemned as “immoral” and “absurd” for portraying Qatar as a “terrorist state”.
The Misfits, co-produced, filmed, and financed by the UAE-based FilmGate Production in partnership with Paramount Pictures and Highland Film Group, tells the story of savvy thief Richard Pace, played by Pierce Brosnan, who escapes from a high-security US prison and goes on to steal millions from the world’s most secure facilities.
In the film, the director refers to Qatar as “Jazeeristan” and accuses its citizens of supporting “terrorist organisations” while Abu Dhabi’s mercenaries are depicted as heroes, Doha News reported.
It added that the film portrays Qatar-based Egyptian Muslim scholar Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi as “the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood and the sponsor of global terrorism”.
The report cited Egyptian journalist, Mohamed Nasser, as saying in a video posted online that The Misfits is nothing more than an attempt by the UAE to “destroy Qatar’s reputation”.
A Twitter user, who watched a leaked copy of the movie, describes it as “absurd” and not worthy of feedback.
“Shame on whoever funded this nonsense,” he added.
Palestinian journalist Jamal Rayyan described the film as “immoral”.
In a series of tweets, Qatari scholar Muhammad al-Kubaisi also slammed the film.
“May God never bless the Emirati leadership. They are using Hollywood and producing a movie called The Misfits, which cost them more than $50m dollars to damage Qatar’s reputation and accuse its peaceful society of terrorism,” he said.
“I do not know why exactly the UAE wants to damage Qatar’s reputation? Is it because we are Muslims and united with God and it wants to eliminate Islam and Muslims? Does the UAE want to distance Qatar from the essence of Islam and support of Muslims everywhere?”…
4:19 p.m., June 27, 2021, Ann <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
I need to be sure that you are real,
and so you will have to get my info like this.
My pictures and cellphone Number are in my account,
so if you like what you see,
you can get my Number and call/text me:
WINNIPEG, Manitoba, June 25, 2021 (Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms) –The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms today released “Lockdowns and the Science of COVID,” a paper based on the medical and scientific evidence presented recently before the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench by expert witness Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.
Dr. Bhattacharya is a tenured Stanford professor of medicine, with particular expertise in the health and well-being of vulnerable populations. As a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, he and over 50,000 medical doctors and infectious disease specialists have called on governments to lift lockdown restrictions on healthy people and instead provide ‘focused protection’ to the elderly and infirm. This would allow for herd immunity to develop safely amongst healthy people.
Dr. Bhattacharya served as an expert witness on behalf of several Justice Centre Applicants in a Charter challenge to Manitoba’s lockdown restrictions. The hearing concluded in May, and the Court’s decision is pending.
“For over fifteen months, Canadians have had their Charter freedoms violated by lockdown policies that don’t stand the test of science,” says lawyer Allison Kindle Pejovic, staff lawyer at the Justice Centre.
“The opinions expressed by Dr. Bhattacharya give us ample reason to doubt the medical and scientific basis for lockdown measures,” stated Pejovic.
This paper provides medical and scientific evidence to support the following:
- COVID does not pose a serious threat to the health of the population
- COVID spread by asymptomatic (healthy) people is rare
- Lockdowns violate principles of good health policy and public health practice
- Lockdowns are not necessary to maintain and enhance health and well-being
- Lockdowns are harmful to the health of the population
- Variant strains of COVID do not justify continued lockdowns
- Lockdown harms are not equitably distributed
- Children do not pose a high risk of disease spread
- Contact tracing is not effective in controlling disease spread
- Lockdowns are especially harmful to young adults
- Religious services are beneficial to participants and can be held safely
- Restaurants and bars can be opened safely
- Gyms, martial arts studios and other physical fitness venues benefit public health and can operate with minimal risk of disease spread
- Focused protection is a better way to protect the population without impairing human rights, civil liberties and basic principles of public health
- There is lasting natural immunity after recovering from a COVID infection
- A positive PCR test does not prove that an individual poses a risk of infecting others
- Florida is an example of a jurisdiction that had success following the focused protection approach
- Florida fully lifted lockdown measures by September 2020, including masks mandates, and fared better in terms of age-adjusted COVID mortality rates than California, which had one of the strictest lockdowns in the United States.
“In the past fifteen months, politicians and chief medical officers have asserted repeatedly at news conferences that lockdowns are scientific and evidence-based, without providing the public with that scientific evidence,” continues Pejovic.
“The evidence tells us that lockdowns are a poor response to COVID-19, and that lockdowns are not a justified violation of our Charter rights and freedoms,” adds Pejovic.
“Our challenge to Canada’s federal and provincial governments boils down to this: after fifteen months of locking people down, isolating them from their friends and family, closing schools, bankrupting businesses, and closing houses of worship, show us your science,” concludes Pejovic.
Reprinted with permission by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
A scammer who called herself Susan is repeatidly sending emails asking me to join a pay site or pay sites to get her contact information. if you click the link it will constantly redirecting to multiple websites the URLs are constantly changing
The horrific killing of four members of a London, Ontario Muslim family who were run over by a pickup truck continues to be cheaply politicized. From Canada’s unwarranted drives against “Islamophobia” (including anti-Islamophobia Motion M-103) to a new controversial Bill C-10 that would give the Liberal government unnerving controls over the internet, there are no holds barred in the manipulation of this tragedy.
At a recent event, which was covered by Robert Spencer HERE, “both Muslim and non-Muslim women wore the hijab in Victoria Park as part of the National Call to Action Against Islamophobia.”
The killings rightly gained widespread sympathy across Canada and elsewhere, which showed the truth that Canada does not have an “Islamophobia” problem.
This “call to action against Islamophobia” featured several speakers from the Muslim Association of Canada, which is by its own admission a Muslim Brotherhood-connected group:
Canada is not anti-Muslim, let alone “Islamophobic” — a useful term that the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (among others) propagates, and that is used to refer to “hurting the feelings of Muslims” and insults to Islam and Muhammad.
The 19-year-old who was initially charged with murder, Nathaniel Veltman, acted alone. According to police, he was not a part of any group. He was still charged with “terrorism” due to the mob mentality and pressure from those who had no qualms about politicizing this tragedy.
Robert Spencer also noted in his article entitled Non-Muslim women don hijabs to ‘combat Islamophobia’:
“We can’t be held hostage to fear or to that Islamophobic attack.” In reality, many of the most celebrated of the cases claiming the harassment of women and girls wearing hijab turned out to have been faked by the victims themselves. In one such incident, an eleven-year-old girl in Toronto made international headlines with her claim that a man had followed her and cut her hijab with scissors. After an investigation, police concluded that the attack never happened. Likewise, Yasmin Seweid, a Muslim teen who claimed in December 2016 that Trump supporters on a New York subway tore off her hijab and no one in the packed subway car helped her. She, too, gained international media attention, and she, too, made up the whole thing. Shortly before that, a hijab-wearing Muslim student at San Diego State University also falsely claimed that she was assaulted by Trump supporters. In July 2017, a Muslim in Britain falsely claimed that a man had pulled off her hijab in a “race hate attack.” In November 2016, a University of Michigan Muslim student claimed she was “accosted by a white man who told her to remove her hijab or he would set her ablaze with a cigarette lighter.” She also fabricated the whole event. And there are many others of this kind.
Like most countries in the West, Canada is being duped into believing that a war against “Islamophobia” is needed. The biggest threat to Muslims in the world is in China, yet Muslim countries have virtually ignored the oppression of the Uighurs. Instead, the Muslim genocide in China is overshadowed in Canada by a single attack from a teenager against a Muslim family. The reeducation, torture and subjugation of multitudes of Muslims in the Uighur community continues in China, yet no one questions the ongoing lack of attention to this among Muslim spokesmen and organizations worldwide.
Westerners continue to play straight into the hands of Islamic supremacist lobbies that are bent on subjugating the West (with help from globalist governments). One weapon in this endeavor is to instill in the minds of Westerners that they are collectively “Islamophobic.” This emotional guilt trip serves an agenda that is working to dismantle democratic institutions. The Chinese genocide of the Uighurs, the Muslim genocide of Christians in Africa and in the Middle East, widespread human rights abuses by Muslims in the name of their religion, and the global jihad against infidels are lost in the bombardment of popular news headlines that are written by the activist media. Whenever any harm brought to Muslims exclusively, no matter how isolated the incident may be, the entire country is singled out for a beating down by the anti-“Islamophobia” brigade — who are determined to enshrine Islam’s blasphemy tenets.
Around 80 people from London participated in the rally — “educating people on the hijab and need to combat Islamophobia in the wake of the killing of a London Ont. Muslim family.”
But did they educate them about this, too?
(Quran 24:31) And tell the believing women to reduce of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which appears thereof and to wrap [a portion of] their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess, or those male attendants having no physical desire, or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment. And turn to Allah in repentance, all of you, O believers, that you might succeed.
If a woman does not cover, she is fair game to be assaulted:
(Quran 33:59) O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.
Those who stand in public support of the hijab should consider the murder and harsh punishments that have befallen scores of genuine women’s rights activists who refused to wear them in sharia-adherent countries. Spencer’s article also aptly described their plight. Just this week, Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan stated (again) that women who wear “small clothes” are to blame for sexual violence. Demonstrations in defense of women and democratic values are what are needed today in multicultural Canada and elsewhere.
The Liberal government has forced its anti-“Islamophobia” initiatives on unsuspecting Canadians, including measures such as “monitoring citizens for compliance” and training law enforcement to recognize online and offline hate. The recent killing of the Muslim family also likely aided the government to pass its controversial Bill C-10, which was widely opposed a month ago and before that. It has been denounced as a threat to the freedom of speech, and described as a “big problem“:
Understand one thing: If the Liberals are able to pass Bill C-10 – an update of the Broadcasting Act – Canada will have the most-regulated Internet in the free world.
Michael Geist, a University of Ottawa law professor and the Canada Research Chair in internet and e-commerce law, warned that Bill C-10:
speaks to a broader theme with the Liberal government in their other plans to crack down on online hate speech and other harmful online content down the line.
Bill C-10 emerged from the Heritage Department, the same department that anti-Islamophobia Motion M-103 sprung from.
Canada is under siege by groups that perpetrate Islamization on one hand, and a Liberal government that is working to dismantle Canada’s free society on the other. In addition to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s enabling of Islamization in Canada, his allegiance to anti-democratic values surfaced two years prior to his becoming Prime Minister: at an Asian Canadian community roundtable discussion, Trudeau answered a question about which nation he admired most. He replied:
“There’s a level of admiration I actually have for China. Their basic dictatorship is actually allowing them to turn their economy around on a dime.”
“Police confirmed for FOX 5 on Thursday that people in the Fairfax County, Virginia school board community had tipped them off to flyers turning up in the Sully Police District. They say about 30 flyers in all were collected in the neighborhood,” said the report. “The flyers include a string of invective words targeting the Fairfax County school board, and advertise the racist organization’s website, and its podcast.”
The flyers reportedly were loaded with racist and homophobic language, calling the school board “queer-loving.”
Anytime homophobic language is attached to racism, you should ask yourself the question, when were white male homosexuals targeted and had crosses burning in their front lawns? When were white homosexuals enslaved, bound and chained to work cotton fields? When the white male slave owner sexual objectified black slave boys and men, how many of them were beaten and hanged? Oh, not in the history books? Exactly.
View original post 166 more words
What will the military, the Supreme Court, and the people eventually do? How will the military, the Supreme Court, and the masses react to the outcome? How will the military move, how will the Supreme Court rule, and eventually do the masses rise up and take to the streets…if it becomes clear that the presidential election of 2020 was compromised, was stolen, or at the very least had way too many abnormalities and illegalities and thus the wrong person is possibly sitting in the White House? What happens if it becomes clear that President Trump was re-elected and the Progressives actually stole the election? What happens if we find out that the election was manipulated? What happens if?
We might find out these answers in the coming months. Maybe. What about the forensic audits of the popular votes in the contested key states?
Before the actual election in November, President Trump predicted cheating as you’ve never seen before. President Trump said there would be voter fraud like never before in U.S. history. Many people throughout the White House believed and were certain that something felonious was about to happen. At 10:30 on Election Night, President Trump was up by good margins in the key states. Then the key states shut down the election tabulations of votes “for the night.” (By the way, the stopping of counting votes for the night had never happened before in presidential history.) And then when we woke up in the morning, after the tallying of votes was supposedly shut down “for the night,” Joe Biden had pulled ahead, stayed ahead, and assumed the White House. As of this writing, Biden has 306 Electoral College votes, and President Trump has 232 votes. Two hundred seventy votes is the magic number to win the presidency.
But what about the forensic audits in the key contested states? Starting with Arizona, then Georgia, then Pennsylvania, then…
The forensic audit of the popular votes in Arizona being conducted right now is intriguing and also a little scary. The forensic audit of the popular votes should be able to catch and identify voting irregularities, cheating, abnormalities, and felonious actions. What happens if not only Arizona flips, but also Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin?
The vote-winning margins in these four states were about 1%, or even much less. Not a whole lot of cheating and theft required to flip the states, if that is what actually historically happened. With Arizona’s 11 Electoral College votes, with Georgia’s 16, with Pennsylvania’s 20, and with Wisconsin’s 10, if those slim margins went to President Trump rather than Biden, the Electoral College vote would be 289 votes for Trump and just 249 for Biden. With Trump needing only 270 for the win, maybe that is why the Progressives are so determined that the forensic audits should not happen. Maybe that is why the Deep State cabal does not want light to shine in on the actual votes last November.
What would happen next? What does the military do? How does the Supreme Court rule? And then how do the masses react? How do both the Patriot and also the Progressive citizens react? Does the military put troops and tanks on the streets, especially in Washington, D.C., to keep Biden in the White House? Does the military arrest Trump for winning? Does the Supreme Court finally “man up” and hear the case of election fraud? Does the Supreme Court rule that President Trump is actually president? Does the Supreme Court rule that Trump is President Trump, but then the military vetoes the Court’s decision and keeps Biden in the White House?
What then do the people do? How then do the masses react to a probable fraudulent election? Do the Patriots finally take to the streets for a “mostly peaceful protest” of the election? Or do the Patriots say they have had enough of the election fraud and fake president, and it gets violent? Does it become the Reds/Patriots versus Blues/Progressives on our streets? What happens to America if?
It is looking more and more as if, no matter what, the military stays with Biden. The military is looking more “woke” than the Berkeley campus as the military drives out Christians, conservatives, and constitutionalists. The military is more concerned with fighting a nonexistent threat of global warming and a trickle of “white supremacy,” appearing unconcerned about a rising Chinese communist menace.
The Supreme Court might be different. There were three Supreme Court members who actually wanted to hear the cases of presidential election fraud. They wanted to see the facts, but it takes four Court members to agree to hear a case. The two key members of the Supreme Court would be Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. It is probable that Barrett and Kavanaugh feel guilty and impotent because of their weak refusal to be actual Supreme Court members and hear tough, politically charged cases. The two of them might have actually changed their minds and toughened up and will agree to hear new challenges of the 2020 presidential election — that is, if, if, if the four states of Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin flip their Electoral College votes to Trump, and thus Trump has exceeded the 270 hurdle. Or will the Supreme Court cower again, just as it did last December?
It is hard to tell at this date if all this reads like a historical chapter of an election held in a banana republic south of the border, or does it read like a cheap novel that no one would believe could play out in America? The military, the Supreme Court, and the masses will have a lot to say either way. Do the Patriots simply wait until 2022 or 2024 and let Biden stay, even if not actually elected? Do the Progressives say that under no circumstances, including the jailing of political opponents, does President Trump ever get back into where he was legally elected?
Keep a sharp eye on the audits going on now and throughout the summer. What happens if, by Labor Day weekend, more than half of the American people believe there was indeed election fraud and criminality?
It might not be pretty. It might get seriously ugly. But these professional forensic audits are necessary. They must be done professionally and accurately. They will have a big say in who resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue for the next three years. Maybe.
A former employee of a Bronx company is suing after he says he was fired for not getting the COVID-19 vaccine.
For more than a year, Antonio Coronado says he was a dedicated employee of Mott Haven-based catering company Great Performances. That ended on May 26.
“They sent me an email, ‘You cannot work for us anymore because you didn’t have the vaccine,'” he claims.
The 35-year-old says he declined to get the vaccine for personal and religious beliefs as a Pentecostal.
“Body is perfect. God made us perfect and we shouldn’t alter our body in any way,” said Coronado.
He hired attorney David Schwartz, who filed a lawsuit against the Bronx business.
“This is probably the first case of its kind filed in New York. It violates New York state law, New York City law. There is no vaccine mandate,” said Schwartz.
Great Performances responded in a statement, saying in part, “We engage in a cooperative dialogue with employees who request a reasonable accommodation based up a disability or a sincerely held religious belief. It is Great Performances’ policy to refrain from further comment to the media about current litigation.”
The company is denying violating any laws.
Coronado was open to being regularly tested for COVID-19 and wearing a mask, but says the employer did not agree to that.
Schwartz says Coronado was not the only employee who was affected.
“It was very important to set precedent and since then there have been other employees from this company that have contacted us and we’re going to be speaking with them also,” said Schwartz.
Coronado says he is not looking for a new job while he pursues the lawsuit.
The bill prohibits showing pornographic material or content portraying homosexuality or transgenderism to minors under the age of 18. Other measures include a registry of sex offenders, regulations on sexual education, and stronger policies against child pornography.
The Hungarian National Assembly approved the bill with 157 votes in favor and one against. Left-wing parliamentarians outnumbered by Hungary’s conservative supermajority boycotted the vote.
Sexual education “must not be aimed at changing gender or promoting homosexuality” and may only be conducted by an approved list of individuals and organizations under the new law, according to a press release from Hungarian ruling party, Fidesz. Restrictions on LGBT ideology also apply to television and advertisements.
To secure “the protection of children’s rights, pornography and content that depicts sexuality for its own purposes or that promotes deviation from gender identity, gender reassignment and homosexuality shall not be made available to persons under the age of 18,” the bill states.
The anti-pedophilia legislation is the latest action in a years-long campaign in Hungary to protect children from liberal ideology and preserve the country’s Christian values. Since 2018, Hungary, led by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has eliminated “gender studies” courses, banned same-sex adoption, required disclaimers for pro-LGBT books aimed at kids, and enshrined the natural family into the national constitution.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, Calif. — The pretrial hearing in the Mercedes Carrera criminal case concerning multiple child sexual abuse charges against her and her husband — which was scheduled for today at the Rancho Cucamonga courthouse in San Bernardino County, California — has been postponed, once again, until August 6.
Carrera and her husband Jason Whitney were arrested after a police raid of their Rancho Cucamonga home on February 1, 2019. They have been in county jail without trial since then, first without bail and later, after they had liquidated their assets and had no source of income due to their incarceration, with bail set at $2 million for each.
A pretrial hearing to determine the jury selection process, and the date of the beginning of the actual trial, has already been postponed numerous times.
The new date of August 6 — like several previous postponements — appeared in a document filed online.
The document shows the hearing took place today with District Attorney Laura Fragoso and a Conflict Panel attorney, Geoff Newman, standing for the accused.
For more of XBIZ’s coverage of the Mercedes Carrera case, click here.
There is a tendency for counselors to believe that interracial couples are aliens that require a unique approach. This idea that interracial couples have issues that cannot be found within intraracial couples. This idea that the different skin color and our current system of white supremacy have anything to do with this couples issue.
Can outside family be a problem for interracial couples? Yes! Can outside family be a problem for intraracial couples? Yes! Can interracial couples have different financial habits? Yes! Can intraracial couples have different financial habits? Yes! Can either be unequally yoked spiritually? Yes! Can either be from different socioeconomic backgrounds? Yes! What can be said or done that cannot be directly tied to a intraracial relationship? Nothing. So when you are dealing with this interracial couple, it means that race is not the issue.
While as a white counselor or black counselor you may see race…
View original post 465 more words
Susli has appeared as a guest on far-right and neo-Nazi podcasts and media networks. She is a contributor to the conspiracy-theory website InfoWars, has appeared on the Mother of All Talk Shows hosted by British socialistGeorge Galloway, on Breaking the Set with Abby Martin, on a podcast run by Holocaust denier Ryan Dawson, on podcasts hosted by the former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan, David Duke, and has been interviewed by neo-Nazi Richard Spencer for the YouTube channel of his National Policy Institute, a white supremacist group.
She has appeared on podcasts hosted by David Duke, the former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan, to discuss Zionism, as well as those of the Holocaust denier Ryan Dawson. She has been interviewed by Richard Spencer for the YouTube channel of his National Policy Institute, a white supremacist group.
(1) Homestead pete on Twitter: “@tariqnasheed She runs in circles with Ry Dawson. A racist who dislikes both blacks and Jews. She herself is always downplaying the black holocaust and saying what’s happening in Syria is far worse. Her and others like her, disguise their disdain for blacks and Jews as concern for Palestine” / Twitter
A U.K. high court judge has ruled in favor of a British woman who was fired from her job because she stated on social media that men could not become women.
Maya Forstater’s contract with the Center for Global Development was not renewed in 2019 due to tweets opposing a government proposal to allow people to identify as the opposite sex.
In a decision released Thursday, High Court Justice Akhlaq Ur-Rahman Choudhury concluded that an earlier tribunal that had ruled against Forstater had “erred in law.”
Choudhury said in the written judgment that Forstater’s beliefs were protected under the Equality Act because they “did not seek to destroy the rights of trans persons.”
“Just as the legal recognition of civil partnerships does not negate the right of a person to believe that marriage should only apply to heterosexual couples, becoming the acquired gender ‘for all purposes’ within the meaning of GRA does not negate a person’s right to believe, like the claimant, that as a matter of biology a trans person is still their natal sex,” the judgment reads in part.
He added: “We do not in any way seek to ignore or downplay the difficulties faced by trans persons seeking merely to live their lives peacefully in the gender with which they identify, irrespective of their natal sex. This case, however, is not about whether greater protection ought to be afforded to trans persons … the potential for offence (sic) cannot be a reason to exclude a belief from protection altogether.”
Choudhury also said that while some might find Forstater’s views on sex and gender to be “offensive and even distressing,” they nevertheless “must be tolerated in a pluralist society.”
The Equality and Human Rights Commission, which intervened in Forstater’s defense, said it was right that religious and philosophical beliefs be protected.
We were warned decades ago. In 1958, in “Willing Slaves of the Welfare State,” C.S. Lewis wrote,
[T]he new oligarchy must more and more base its claim to plan us on its claim to knowledge. If we are to be mothered, mother must know best. This means they must increasingly rely on the advice of scientists, till in the end the politicians proper become merely the scientists’ puppets. Technocracy is the form to which a planned society must tend. Now I dread specialists in power because they are specialists speaking outside their special subjects. Let scientists tell us about sciences. But government involves questions about the good for man, and justice, and what things are worth having at what price; and on these a scientific training gives a man’s opinion no added value… I dread government in the name of science. That is how tyrannies come in.
In the past 18 months, has there been a more dreaded “specialist in power” than Dr. Anthony Fauci? Seemingly reveling in his ability to inflict technocratic tyranny, Fauci has spent much of the past 18 months speaking outside his special subject. And during the Wuhan virus “casedemic” (it was more this than a pandemic) even when he stuck to his “special subject” (immunology and infectious diseases), Fauci has frequently been proven wrong.
On everything from masks to social distancing, testing, the lockdowns, the vaccinated, the asymptomatic, herd immunity, and the origins of the Wuhan virus, Fauci (along with his like-minded ilk) has regularly failed to get it right. Nevertheless, Fauci tells us that those now calling him out — with some (rightly) demanding his resignation or firing — for his repeated failures and deceit are guilty of attacking “science and the truth.”
In other words, in order to protect himself, Fauci is hiding behind “the science.” This is nothing more than another technocrat using scientism to further himself and his perverse agenda, all the while hoping to keep his hands on the levers of Big Government as long as possible. Like all of those steeped in scientism, Fauci is guilty of abusing the scientific method and scientific authority.
Fauci’s scientism has wrought near-immeasurable damage to the U.S. Hundreds of thousands of American businesses were shut down during the foolish lockdowns, with many never to reopen. As a result, millions of Americans lost their jobs. In an attempt to fix this self-inflicted problem, the U.S. government has incurred several trillion dollars more in debt on top of the numerous trillions in debt with which we were already burdened.
A fundamentalist Christian sect with close ties to the newest judge on the Supreme Court, Amy Coney Barrett, has hired law firms over claims it failed to properly investigate three claims of sex abuse against underage members.
People of Praise, which grew out of the charismatic Christian movement of the early 1970s and now claims to have 1,700 followers, has hired a former sex crimes prosecutor and second law firm to investigate the allegations made by the women.
One accuser, Katie Logan, claims she was sexually abused by a teacher at a People of Praise school in 2001, when she was 17. She says the school failed to follow-up her reports of the abuse until she went to police in December 2020. The other two say they were abused as children by members of a sect that later joined with People of Praise, and that PoP subsequently failed to investigate properly.
Logan, now 37, was just 17 when her high school physics teacher, Dave Beskar, sexually assaulted her in 2001, she alleges.
Beskar was a teacher at Trinity School at River Ridge, in Eagan, Minnesota.
She said she had a teenage crush on him; he was 35 at the time.
He would come round to the family home, in their tight-knit community, and had dinner with her and her parents – something she now sees as grooming.
One evening, when her parents were away, he came over to use the family’s computer, Logan alleges.
Virginia Tech freshman linebacker Isimemen Etute has been accused of beating a man to death for catfishing him on Tinder.
The 18-year-old player reportedly told the Blacksburg Police that he went to an apartment expecting to meet a woman named “Angie” that he said he met on the dating app, according to the Roanoke Times.
Instead of meeting a woman as expected, though, prosecutors say Etute met 40-year-old Jerry Smith.
Furious, Etute left the man’s apartment but police say he returned on May 31. It was then he reportedly attacked the man. Investigators say that Etute admitted to them that he punched the man in the face five times and then “stomped” him.
Investigators also said that Etute didn’t call the police even though he heard “bubbling and gurgling” coming from the victim. Police found Smith’s body a day later. An autopsy revealed that Smith died of blunt trauma and all the bones in his face were broken.
Etute was arrested on June 2 and was charged with second-degree murder.
At a hearing on Wednesday, Etute’s attorney said that the attack was more than just “more than someone just showing up to an apartment and punching someone.”
During the hearing, Etute said the charges have hit him “real hard.”
“I’m trying to stay strong for the people that support me, I feel like I’ve let a lot of people down … I’m truly sorry for my actions,” he told the court.
Etute’s lawyer, Jimmy Turk, later told the media that the incident is an example of why someone shouldn’t misrepresent themselves.
“Nobody deserves to die, but I don’t mind saying, don’t pretend you are something that you are not,” Turk said after the hearing. “Don’t target or lure anyone under that perception. That’s just wrong.”
Etute was released to monitored home confinement on a $75,000 bond.