Pegida Canada rallies at Toronto terrorist attack scene: “Revoke citizenship of jihadis”

Pegida Canada sympathizers gathered on Saturday, April 9, 2016 outside of the Joseph Shepard building in Toronto, where a month ago two soldiers were recently injured in a terrorist stabbing attack.


On March 14, 2016 at approximately 3:30 pm, 27 year old Montreal-born Ayanle Hassan Ali entered a government building located at 4900 Yonge Street in North York, walked towards the recruiting centre and struck a uniformed soldier, who fell to the ground but managed to get up and noticed that the accused had a large knife in his hand.

The accused continued to advance to the soldier, slashed him in the upper right arm, then went to the centre and attempted to slash a uniformed female Canadian forces member who managed to escape unharmed. Military personnel on the scene managed to corral civilians into a safe location and were able subdue the accused before the police arrived and arrested him.

According to Chief of Police Mark Saunders, while at the scene, the accused said that “Allah told me to do this. Allah told me to come here and kill people”. Ayanle Hassan Ali is facing nine charges including attempted murder, aggravated assault and assault with a weapon.

The protesters marched outside the Joseph Shepard building holding signs against terrorism and radical Islam: “Revoke citizenship of jihadis”, “Remove imams who preach hate”, “Remember the victims of Islam”, “Rapefugees not welcome”, “No Sharia barbarism”, “Don’t let Canada become Europe”, “Islamic theocracy hates democracy”, “Watch the mosques”, “stand with us Pegida Canada, preserve our values”, “Continue the war on ISIS”.

One of the protesters told CIJnews that “We will continue to have a voice, albeit small, and we hope that by our efforts, support will grow, and people will not be afraid to speak, and fight for truth and justice.”

When asked about the nature of Pegida Canada and allegations in media of being a “far right and violent” group, she explained: “We are patriots, pure and simple. We love our country, and we want to preserve our Judaeo/Christian democracy. We are neither racists nor bigots nor fascists, and we certainly take exception to those labels. Our rallies and demos are peaceful, and done within the boundaries of the law.”

“Our fight against Islamization is necessary. Islam, by its very nature, is not compatible in a democratic society,” she added. “People in North America are complacent. They have never experienced oppression or war on their soil in this century, and they are secure in their prosperity. We want to wake them up to the potential disaster that could overtake this great country if measures are not put into place. We urge them to look to Europe and the chaos that is happening there.”

We continue to demo, quietly, peacefully, and we continue to educate. We also petition our government. We have had very little response from our government. However, we think it important to have a voice there.”

Pegida Canada held similar rallied in recent months at Dundas Sqaure, Yorkdale Mall and outside the Promenade mall in Thornhill.

Mainland accused of abducting Taiwanese from Kenya


Taiwan has accused the mainland of kidnapping eight Taiwanese who had been cleared of criminal charges by a court in Kenya, and has demanded their immediate return.

The alleged abduction — described by Taiwan’s foreign ministry as “illegal” and “uncivilised” — posed a potential challenge to president-elect Tsai Ing-wen, who takes office next month.

Kenyan authorities in November 2014 arrested 28 Taiwanese along with 49 other ethnic Chinese on charges of illegally entering the African state and being involved in an telecoms scam, the Taiwanese foreign ministry said in a statement.

A first group of 37 suspects, among them 23 Taiwan citizens, was found not guilty by a Kenyan court on Tuesday last week. But eight of the 23 Taiwanese, were deported to the mainland by Kenyan authorities last Friday due to Beijing’s pressure, it said.

Taiwan has no diplomatic ties with Kenya, which recognises the government in Beijing. Its nearest diplomat is based in the South African capital.

The ministry said Beijing used “technical methods” to delay news of the Kenyan court’s verdict. “By the time our official rushed to the airport, the eight Taiwan citizens had been forcefully taken to a passenger plane of China Southern Airlines and sent to the mainland,” it said. “The illegal and uncivilised measures have severely infringed upon the fundamental human rights of the eight people.”

The ministry demanded that the mainland immediately return the eight to Taiwan, and called on Kenyan authorities to free the other 15 acquitted Taiwanese.

Asked to comment on the row, a foreign ministry spokesman in Beijing, Lu Kang, said: “We need to check on the details, but we need to note that the One China policy should be upheld.”

In 2011, authorities returned 14 Taiwanese suspected in a major fraud case after the Philippines had deported them to the mainland. That came after nearly four months of efforts to secure their return.

Survey: 66.6% of S. Koreans Intend to Vote in General Elections

In a recent survey, 66-point-six percent of South Koreans said that they will definitely vote in the April 13 general elections, an increase of eight-and-a-half percentage points from the previous general elections.

According to the survey commissioned by the National Election Commission(NEC), the rate was highest in Gwangju and Jeolla Province at 70-point-six percent, followed by Incheon and Gyeonggi Province at 69-point-five percent, and Busan, Ulsan and South Gyeongsang Province at 66-point-six percent.

Thirty three-point-three percent of the respondents said that they will consider the competency of candidates when voting, while 28 percent said they will focus on policies or election pledges. Nineteen percent said that they will elect candidates based on party affiliation.

Among the respondents who said that they will not vote, 49 percent felt things would not change, while 20 percent said that they are not interested in politics.

The telephone survey was conducted last Monday and Tuesday by Research and Research on 15-hundred voters over the age of 19.

The poll had a 95 percent confidence level with a margin of error of plus or minus two-point-five percentage points.

Report: Extremist group affiliated with ISIS operating in a mosque in Windsor, Ontario

Al Forqan Newspaper‎ (جريدة الفرقان) is bi-monthly magazine printed in Windsor, Ontario anddistributed in Windsor, London and Detroit. Its founder, CEO and Editor in Chief is Mohamad Hisham Khalifeh (محمد هشام خليفة), a Canadian of Lebanese descent.

The magazine has a regular section called “The Secrets of the [Muslim/ Arab] Community”. In Issue 35 (December 2015 – January 2016, p. 2), Al Forqan revealed the following “secret” related to the local Muslim community in Windsor, Ontario:

Regarding this issue’s secret, it is reported that there is a ‘hard-lined group’ which holds meetings at a Windsor mosque. They are members of an extremist cell affiliated with ISIS [a.k.a. ISIL, Islamic State, Daesh, Caliphate]. Therefore, we call on those in charge of the mosque to rectify the matter, and especially during this difficult time.”

The magazine did not elaborate whether this issue was reported to the RCMP and CSIS.

Pot Meets Kettle: Beyoncé suing Texas company over copyright infringement

one of the biggest copyright thief in Anglo-American music suing other people for copyright infringement



Beyoncé suing Texas company over copyright infringement


INDIANAPOLIS (WISH) – Grammy winning singer Beyoncé is suing a company for selling “Feyoncé” gear.

Beyonce sued the Texas company, Feyoncé Inc, for selling merchandise that infringes on her copyrighted name.

The San Antonio company’s items include a coffee mug with “Feyoncé – He Put a Ring On It.”

The lawsuit said the mug was specifically designed to resemble Beyoncé’s 2008 hit, “Single Ladies.”

In addition, it also said the company ignored a previous cease and desist letter to stop selling the products.

The lawsuit comes one year after the singer’s lawyers complained to Etsy about “Feyoncé” mugs. Those items were removed, but other products labeled  “Feyoncé”  are still available for purchase.


The ‘Male Feminist’ Problem

The ‘Male Feminist’ Problem


How many times must I say it? Never talk to a feminist:

Guys: Learn to take a hint. Learn to walk away.
If a woman tells you she is a feminist, say nothing and walk away.
No feminist wants to hear what a man has to say, and life is too short to waste your time taking to feminists. Just walk away.
Leave feminists alone, and then they can complain about that.

There is no point arguing with a feminist. There is nothing to discuss. The feminist has complete contempt for males. She considers men useless and irrelevant. She has no respect for you. The fact that you are a man means you are automatically wrong about everything. She is the judge, jury and prosecutor, and all men are guilty. Case closed.

Jocelyn MacDonald is a feminist in Seattle who declares: “Men are parasites. Separatism is the first step to feminism.” Citing lesbian feminist Marilyn Frye, MacDonald argues that “male privilege makes men thieves of [women’s] mental, spiritual, and physical energy”:

Throughout patriarchal history, men have had virtually unlimited access to women’s bodies. They have engineered and maintained this through marriage, denying access to abortion, and undervaluing women’s labour, among others too numerous to list off.

Can she possibly make the point any clearer? Males are “parasites” and “thieves.” Feminists are anti-marriage, anti-motherhood, and do not believe any man should ever have “access to women’s bodies.”

However, Ms. MacDonald did not always feel this way. She was notalways a lesbian separatist. Once upon a time, she fell in love with a man:

The man in question, Adam [a pseudonym], was a PhD candidate at the University of Rochester. . . .
I met Adam when I was 19 and he was 26. We got to know each other going to protests: an anti-Nazi rally in Buffalo, a picket at the border patrol on Lake Ontario, a few house parties hosted by the International Socialist Organization. . . .
With him, I felt like a real person again, and it was as a complete and whole person that I had sex with a man for the first time, feeling neither that I was losing something or giving something away.
A few months later, we decided to get married. Because what could be funnier than a couple of queer, ethically nonmonogamous, Marxist atheists redefining traditional marriage in a small ceremony in a Quaker meetinghouse? The answer is nothing. Except that I loved the living hell out of him and definitely wanted to bear his math-prodigy, prematurely balding, little Lenin look-alikes. And I believed that for him, I was the one so impossible not to love that he thought about marriage like it wasn’t a social construct designed to replicate the modes of production. . . .

Perhaps you see the basic problem here. What are the odds of “a couple of queer . . . Marxist atheists” having a happy-ever-after romance? Well, they went to her mother’s house for Christmas. The prematurely balding math prodigy was aloof, while Ms. MacDonald got drunk and then, the day after Christmas, her little Lenin look-alike made an announcement:

In the morning, I woke up and crawled in Adam’s bed, excited, cuddly, happy. “I missed you,” I said.
“I’m flying to Rochester in an hour and a half,” he said. “And we need to talk.”
He walked me back to my room where we sat on my bed.
“Remember when I said it would be impossible not to love you?”
“Yes,” I said, pleased.
“That’s still true. I find it impossible not to love you, and that’s why I don’t want to see you anymore. Because I don’t want to be in love. I want to be alone.”
It was unbelievable to me, because I was doing all the work. I’d made love like it was a choice, you just keep saying yes to love. I was doing all that needed to be done to accommodate him and he was saying both that it was working, that he loved me back, and also that it was for that reason that he never wanted to see me again.
I was shattered. He had stopped believing in me, in our love. Our marriage was a revolution yet-to-be imagined, and he was no longer convinced.

Tough luck for the queer Marxist atheist girl, because the queer Marxist atheist guy does not want to be in love. He’d rather be alone.

Here we see the “male feminist” problem in stark relief. A major reason feminists hate men so much is because these are the only kind of men they associate with. What kind of guy spends his spare time at “house parties hosted by the International Socialist Organization”? You’d meet a better quality of men at a Toby Keith concert or a monster truck rally.

This is why parents must warn their daughters never to become feminists. Next thing you know, she’ll be dating a Marxist weirdo and, when that falls apart, she’ll move to Seattle and become a lesbian separatist.

Also, there’s a high rate of herpes among feminists.


Remember what 21st-century feminism is all about:

Until I started studying radical feminism, I never thought of “normal” as an achievement, but Feminism Is Queer, as Professor Mimi Marinucci has explained. Feminist theory condemns heterosexuality as “the ideology of male supremacy,” and denies that behavioral differences between men and women are natural. Any apparent differences between men and women are socially constructed by the gender binary within the heterosexual matrix (see Judith Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, 1990). Feminism seeks to abolish gender in order to achieve “equality” by establishing an androgynous society in which the categories “male” and “female” cease to have any significance.

Feminism is a cult. Once young people get involved in this weird ideology, it becomes impossible for them to think or behave normally

click link to see picture.

That nose-pierced weirdo, believe it or not, grew up in a conservative Christian family and attended Bible college, but dropped out after she became involved in feminism and decided gender theory is more important than the Bible. Allie McDougall now attends the University of Ottawa, where her boyfriend is co-chair of the university chapter of the socialist New Democratic Party. She now attends St. Albans, a “progressive” Anglican church that performs “liturgies” for renaming transgendered people. Anyway, you might want to read what Ms. McDougall has to say about her “life partner” Davis Whittington-Heeney:

My partner Davis is a feminist ally, and a very committed one. In all of his political activities, he strives for gender parity. He listens to and amplifies women’s voices whenever he can. Ours is an egalitarian relationship and he respects, uplifts, and affirms my lived experience. And it makes me so sad when people tell me how lucky I am, how rare he is, and how I should be so proud that my boyfriend actively works with and for feminist activism. Yes, I am lucky; yes, he is great and probably a rarity; but why the hell is it so countercultural for him to actually put his money where is mouth is and use his male privilege to amplify my voice and the voices of other women? I believe this is all rooted in the depressingly low standards of acceptable behaviour that men have inherited as a by-product of their patriarchal advantage.


OK, what are the odds of a happy-ever-after ending here? Do you detect apattern, dear reader? When we recall that “God is not the author of confusion” (I Corinthians 14:33),  we must conclude that the father of lies (John 8:44) is responsible for this pattern. More from Ms. McDougall:

I struggle with feelings of anxiety and inferiority. I’ve forgotten completely periods of time that were my darkest. I’ve made regrettable decisions that have harmed my relationship with my partner . . .
I’ve scheduled appointments to meet with a registered psychotherapist to help start down the road of progress and recovery.

Where do you think that road will lead? Do you think Allie McDougall might end up like Jocelyn MacDonald, arguing for lesbian separatism? Do you see why the “male feminist” is such a problem? Every time a guy plays along with this game — nodding in assent while feminists denounce “male privilege” and “patriarchal advantage” — he lends credence to this cult ideology. It encourages feminists to believe that all men could be the Davis Whittington-Heeney type, and that the only thing preventing us from becoming Male Feminists is our own ignorance or desire to cling to our “male privilege.” However, even if this were possible for us all to become the Davis Whittington-Heeney type (which, thank God, it is not) our civilization could not survive such a transformation. A society in which all men were the Davis Whittington-Heeney type would be overrun by barbarians. Frankly, this is what’s happening in Germany, where Muslim “refugees” are raping women and girls with impunity (and feminists won’t say a word about it). The Radical Theology of Feminismhas crippled the West, convincing many people that “progress” requires the destruction of our civilization, wrecking families and ruining lives, and steering young people toward The Darwinian Dead End.

Feminists despise men as “parasites” and “thieves,” and have the effrontery to expect men to agree with these insults.

Learn to walk away. Never talk to a feminist. Seek companionship elsewhere, and leave her alone, with her ideology and her cats.

‘Obsessed With Sex’?

‘Obsessed With Sex’?


A stunning incident happened earlier this month at a debate in Toronto over immigration. This debate particularly concerned the flood of Muslim “refugees” that has provoked a crisis in Europe. The proponents on the open-borders side of this debate were Louise Arbour, former UN Human Rights commissioner and Columbia University history professor Simon Schama. Their antagonists were Nigel Farage, leader of Great Britain’s UK Independence Party (UKIP), and the incomparable Mark Steyn.

Farage and Steyn both made extensive reference to wave of violence that Muslim immigrants have unleashed in Europe, including the New Year’s Eve nightmare in Cologne, Germany, where hundreds of women were sexually assaulted. (See, “Muslim Rape Gangs Attack Women, and Feminists Won’t Say a Word About It.”) Because of liberal bias in the media, however, very few Americans — or Canadians, for that matter — are aware of the extent of what can fairly be called sexual terrorism that is being perpetrated in Europe. Facts that do not fit the liberal narrative have a remarkable tendency to elude the attention of editors at the New York Times and producers at CNN, so that unless you are in the habit of seeking out samizdat published by politically incorrect sources, you have never heard of The Rotherham Horror, nor are you aware of why Sweden now challenges South Africa for the title of Rape Capital of the World.

Because of the major media’s near-total suppression of stories like this, however, you have to be a “right-wing extremist” even to be aware of it, and the situation reminds me of an old Lynyrd Skynyrd lyric:

If you don’t know what I mean,
Won’t you stand up and scream,
‘Cause there’s things going on
That you don’t know.

Meanwhile, in Toronto, Steyn and Farage were enlightening the debate audience as to what’s going on in Europe, and the open-borders apologists responded rather flippantly. Ms. Arbour mockingly called Steyn and Farage “newborn feminists” — eliciting laughter from the predominantly liberal audience — and Professor Schama got an even bigger laugh when he sneered: “I’m just struck by how obsessed with sex these two guys are, actually. It’s a bit sad, really.” Well, that hit the trip wire with Steyn, who exploded like a Claymore mine:

“I made a decision tonight that I wasn’t going to do funny. I was going to be deadly serious. I’m slightly amazed at our colleagues’ ability to get big laughs on gang rape. Madame Arbour scoffs at the newfound feminists over here. I’m not much of a feminist, but I draw the line at 3-year-olds getting raped and the 7-year-old getting gang-raped in a basement. And when Simon tells us … we’re obsessed with sex — maybe we don’t get enough action in the Toronto singles bars — Madame Arbour, as she said, is a feminist of a certain generation, and those feminists were very clear, as Madame Arbour was very clear in Sudan, that rape is not about sex. Whatever Simon may say, rape is about power, which is what Madame Arbour says.”

Steyn then listed a series of sexual assaults committed by Muslim men in Germany, concluding: “These are all gang rapes in public places . . . and I congratulate you for getting big laughs for that, Simon. . . . It isn’t funny.”

Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch:

The Munk tradition is to poll the audience before and again after the debate. The first poll was 77% in favor of the motion, 23% opposed. After the debate, the pro side dropped to 55% and the con leapt up to 45%, a huge, 22% shift, revealing how a dynamic elaboration of the facts of the case can persuade people of the dangers of welcoming mass numbers from an alien culture into Western societies.

Mark Steyn himself has a good round-up of the post-debate reaction. The accusation from liberals that conservatives are “obsessed with sex” is, of course, highly ironic. For more than a half-century, liberals have advocated every manner of perversion, and feminists were even willing to defend President Clinton’s disgraceful debauchery in the White House.

“I would be happy to give [Bill Clinton] a blowjob just to thank him for keeping abortion legal. I think American women should be lining up with their presidential kneepads on to show their gratitude for keeping the theocracy off our backs.”
Nina Burleigh, 1998

Liberals have no moral principles whatsoever and, in fact, they actively seek to destroy morality. Not content to have banned Christianity from schools, they now use the schools to indoctrinate children in atheism.

Who is “obsessed with sex”? Perhaps the feminists, who have managed to gin up such a climate of sexual paranoia on university campuses thatRolling Stone was willing to publish Jackie Coakley’s false gang-rape tale, without basic journalistic fact-checking. Who is obsessed with sex? Perhaps the feminists, who take to Twitter to proclaim their herpes infections, or maybe the liberals like Bruce Springsteen, who canceled a concert in North Carolina to defend the “right” of men in dresses to share public restrooms with your daughter. Who is “obsessed with sex”? Maybe the Colorado public school teachers who are trained in a program called “A Queer Endeavor” to promote homosexuality in their classrooms.

Liberals are doing everything they can to destroy whatever remains of decency and religious morality in America, so that everybody has a “right” to be a herpes-infected feminist or a transvestite, and normal people have no rights at all, but it is conservatives who are “obsessed with sex”?

Yet where is Nina Burleigh, who called pro-life conservatives a “theocracy,” now that Muslim theocrats are rampaging across the globe? And where are the feminist “rape culture” mobs — who applauded whenthe captain of the Yale basketball team was expelled — now that women and children are being gang-raped by Muslim “refugees” in Europe?

Like the song says, there are things going on that you don’t know.


A FAMILY AFFAIR: Alison Rapp’s Husband Is Also a Sex Worker

A FAMILY AFFAIR: Alison Rapp’s Husband Is Also a Sex Worker


“Jake Rapp” appears to be controlled and pimped by the pedophile  and child porn supporting degenerate whore Alison Rapp. Before He met that demonic whore of a woman  he was a stable Christian man.

Major Newspaper Censors Politically Incorrect Story About Muslim Chain Attack


Major Newspaper Censors Politically Incorrect Story About Muslim Chain Attack


A major newspaper in Canada has removed a story about two refugee children who choked a girl with a chain while shouting “Muslims rule the world” in a shocking example of politically correct-driven censorship.

The original article published by the Chronicle Herald described how a grade three girl at Chebucto Heights Elementary School was choked on two separate occasions by two “refugee boys” who had arrived in February and that “a chain was used on both occasions”.

According to the girl’s mother ‘Missy’, who didn’t want to be named because she feared retribution, the boys yelled “Muslims rule the world” while they carried out the assault, but were not even disciplined by the school.

252 refugee students are currently enrolled in the region, with another 71 waiting on settlement of permanent housing.

Another mother quoted by the Herald also claimed that her daughter begged her to be allowed to stay home from school after she was “slapped after she and a classmate disagreed in the schoolyard,” and that the school again took no action and didn’t even call her.

But perhaps the most shocking turn of events came when the Herald, which had already printed the story in its hard copy, first edited the article on its website to remove the “Muslims rule the world” quote and then deleted the story entirely.

After social justice warriors chimed in with a flurry of complaints, in a bow to political correctness, the Herald replaced the story with a mealy-mouthed apology stating, “Bullying is a sensitive subject. So is the integration of newcomers, particularly those who have faced challenges, even trauma, on their way here.”

The fact that the headline may have caused offense to an “identifiable cultural group” was also described at “problematic” by the newspaper, which also lamented the fact that news outlets critical of Islam had shared the story.

“What they’re really saying is – we accidentally told the truth, we’ll work harder to prevent that happening in the future,” wrote the BlazingCatFur blog.

“This being PM Useful Idiot’s Canada we already know the press ignores stories unfavourable to the Liberal lie. But now they’ve taken to “disappearing” news unfavourable to the Liberal narrative they’ve accidentally reported.”

The Chronicle Herald is the highest circulation newspaper in the Atlantic provinces and is the largest independently owned newspaper company in Canada.

The fact that the story was removed from the Internet after being published in the physical newspaper (see images below) attests to the complete cowardice of the Chronicle Herald in bowing to public pressure from perpetually outraged social justice mobs.

Because the story completely demolished the leftist narrative about the wave of “refugees” now arriving in the west, it was censored.

NHK poll: Abe cabinet support rate at 42%


An NHK opinion poll shows the support rate for Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s Cabinet has fallen to 42 percent.
The disapproval rate rose to 39 percent.

Around 1,000 people responded to a telephone survey from Friday through Sunday.

The Cabinet’s support rate went down 4 percentage points from last month’s survey. The disapproval rate rose by 2 points.

Asked about the consumption tax increase to 10 percent set for April of next year, 22 percent expressed approval and 45 percent expressed disapproval. 28 percent were undecided.

About whether the current session of the Diet should approve legislation for the Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade deal, 24 percent answered “Yes” and 18 percent replied “No.” 47 percent were undecided.

On the best outcome in the upcoming Upper House election this summer, 23 percent supported more seats being occupied by the ruling coalition parties, 32 percent cited more seats from the opposition camp, and 40 percent said neither.