SMOKING GUN: Big Pharma Worked with UN to Develop and Release COVID-19 Ahead of Great Reset

Footage broadcast on C-SPAN shows top HHS health officials war gaming how to shift the vaccine manufacturing process from the traditional method to MRNA technology. Read more here:

EXPLOSIVE VIDEO Emerges of #Fauci, HHS Officials Plotting for ‘A New Avian Flu Virus’

Pronoun Coercion in Canada

There are many places around the world where the current transgender madness has become fully institutionalized and caused extensive damage to the lives of confused young people. But one of the very worst jurisdictions, as far as sheer sanity is concerned, is the Canadian province of British Columbia.

A few months back I wrote about a postman in Vancouver who ended up in jail because he dared to protest when his troubled daughter, after talking with her school counselor, was launched, beginning at age twelve, and at first without his knowledge, on the now familiar path toward “gender-affirmation surgery” – that is, irreversible mutilation of her sexual organs.  

But that postman’s story isn’t the only bonkers trans-related news from B.C. Last December, the provincial judiciary – acting on “guidance” from an activist body called the Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Community (SOGIC) – instructed lawyers that thenceforth, whenever they identified themselves to a judge in a courtroom, they would be expected to announce their pronouns of choice as well as the pronouns of their clients.

When an attorney named Shahdin Farsai submitted an article critical of this new policy to a Canadian law journal called The Advocate, the editors accepted it only to change their minds for fear that it would lead to a human-rights complaint. A shorter version of the piece later appeared in The Canadian Lawyer, but the editors, after receiving furious responses from readers, pulled the article from their website and posted an apology.

Farsai and other critics of the new policy then called for a debate about it at the annual meeting of the Law Society of British Columbia, which takes place today, October 5.

“There are three issues here,” says James Heller, one of the policy’s critics. “How the transgender activists in the bar managed to get the judges to do this in the first place, the wisdom or merit of the directives (or lack thereof), and the importance of at least keeping a ‘safe space’ for lawyers of all people to discuss this subject.”

Jordan Peterson, recalls Heller, first gained international attention with his opposition to Bill C 16 (2017), requiring Canadians to honor one another’s chosen pronouns. Peterson’s warning that the bill, if passed – and it did pass – would lead to situations beyond anyone’s imagining has now come true. “We’re deeper into Candyland,” says Heller, “where lawyers, and anyone coming into court, are forced to announce their own pronouns now. This is all an encroachment on common sense, not to mention the lawyer’s own sense of self and likewise his or her client’s. Most people are secure in how the world sees their gender or sexual identity and have no interest in pretending that that’s an uncertainty that must be continually addressed.”

Heller adds that “C 16 would not likely have passed if we had known just where this was leading. But the critical concern central to our resolution is that we must be able to talk about these things. We can’t have legal periodicals scared off from hosting essential discussions and debates in which lawyers consider issues, ruminate, persuade, and refine their understanding. That isn’t ‘hate speech,’ last time I looked.”

On October 1, CBC Radio broadcast a segment about the pronoun issue in B.C. courts. Host Gloria Macarenko had one guest: Margot Young, whom Macarenko identified as a law professor at the University of British Columbia.

In fact, Young is not just any law professor. Her bio at the university’s website identifies her as a teacher of “social justice law,” as “the Director of the Social Justice Specialization at the law school,” as a research associate with “the Centre for Gender, Race, Sexuality and Social Justice at UBC,” as “co-editor of the collection Poverty: Rights, Social Citizenship and Legal Activist,” as “a member of the editorial boar[d] of the Canadian Journal of Women and Law” and an associate of “the Feminist Alliance for International Action.”

In other words, she’s not just a lawyer and law professor. She’s one of those hard-core academic activists who believe in using the law – twisting it, mangling it, turning it inside out and upside down – to advance radical causes.

In this case, the cause is transgender ideology.

Asked by Macarenko what this matter was about, Young characterized it as a matter so trivial that any protest was either frivolous or outright hateful. Lawyers, when introducing themselves in a court case, now have to state not only their names but also their pronouns, to wit: “I use she/her pronouns. My client uses he/she pronouns.” This, Young assured Macarenko, amounted to a “very minor change” that “gives the court important, key information” and “saves transgender or nonbinary people from…distressing misgendering.”

How then, asked Macarenko, can this new policy be criticized? Young professed to find it “hard to understand the criticism.” The complainants, she noted, describe the policy as an “infringement with free speech,” a “transgression of privacy,” and “an ideological move by the court.” But, she added, “if you ask me to explain – I just can’t.”

Macarenko laughed merrily. The message was already clear. To raise one’s voice in protest against this innovation was risible. Never mind that at no time in human history had people in courtrooms ever been compelled to announce their pronouns. Precedent is crucial in the practice of law; but in B.C. it had been swept aside tout de suite to accommodate a new trend backed by a powerful activist lobby.

Young took the oh-it’s-no-big-deal line: there are always “changes in language”; this new policy was just “catching up with what is a common-sense practice these days”; it was only about being “Inclusive and respectful of transgender and binary individuals.”

You might think that there’d already been years of intense worldwide conversation about this pronoun stuff, and that after endless back-and-forth the whole business had finally been more or less settled. But no: this new twist has happened virtually overnight, foisted on institutions by activists who plainly didn’t want the public to have a voice.

And it’s clear why. Most people have common sense. A man can’t be a woman. A woman can’t be a man. All the surgery in the world can’t change that.

To be sure, for a long time transsexuals had been a tiny minority, mostly content to be left alone. Most of them had had extensive surgery, were taking hormones regularly, and made an effort every day to look as much as possible like members of the opposite sex. They asked only to be referred to as members of that sex. As a rule, the rest of society went along. Not because anyone thought that, say, the famous travel writer Jan Morris, born James Morris, was really a woman, but because it seemed harmless to pretend that she was, just to be kind.

But this is no longer about being kind. Suddenly, in the last few years, everything changed. People who identify as transgender are no longer a vanishingly tiny minority. Identifying as the opposite sex is now a hot trend. Pronouns are no longer just pronouns – they’re markers of specialness. Today, men calling themselves women and women calling themselves men are all over the place. And they’re not asking to be left alone. They’re demanding that every longstanding institution, every centuries-old practice, every rule and regulation, be adjusted to account for their reality-defying claims of gender identity.  

It’s supremely irrational. But somehow, in certain countries, and above all in the Anglosphere, buying into this madness has become the supreme hallmark of whether one is a member of the sophisticated elite or of the vulgar deplorables.

So it was that Macarenko, interviewing Young, laughed again. How could any civilized person protest such a plainly humane measure as the new pronoun rule?

She asked Young what the critics of the policy meant by “forced speech.” Young replied by calling that charge “trivial, silly.” As for the complaint that B.C. lawyers had not been consulted on the new policy, she countered that “the court did its job on consultation” by meeting “with marginalized communities” and “with some committee” (perhaps she meant the SOGIC).

Admittedly, the judiciary had chosen not to consult with potential critics of the new pronoun dispensation. And Young felt this was an entirely proper decision: “they have quite rightly refused to open up a broader conversation or debate over this.” Why? Because “some issues are not up for debate.” This, after all, was a matter of “human rights.”

And there you have it: an example of the slithery sleight of hand at the center of this entire movement. It’s all about “human rights” – case closed.

No, it’s not about “human rights.” It’s about reorganizing society around an ideology centered on sweeping identity claims that have no basis whatsoever in reality. It’s about transforming millennia of human practice to accommodate a bizarre, irrational craze whose promoters have consistently used intimidation tactics to stifle even the slightest open debate about it. Even to ask questions, they insist, is to show disrespect – or even to invite suicide.

Another B.C. lawyer, in another interview with another journalist about the new pronouns policy, added to the “human rights” argument another familiar claim: that to oppose any accommodation of trans people was to deny their very existence. “I’m afraid the resolution actually is an expression of suspicion about whether trans people are real,” attorney Adrienne Smith, who identifies as non-binary, told City News.

“I don’t think trans identity is something that should be debated,” said Smith. “I don’t think our entitlement to dignity and respect and human rights protection is something that should be debated.” But dignity and respect for an individual are one thing; accepting that individual’s claim to be a member of the opposite sex, and his or her demand that any number of social and legal conventions be upended on his or her account, is another.

Yet another B.C. attorney, Kyla Lee, wrote yesterday in Lawyers Daily that taking the arguments against the new policy to the logical extreme “would suggest that lawyers could permissibly debate the merits of slavery.” In other words, not having a court respect whatever pronouns you decided to use when you woke up this morning is comparable to involuntary servitude.

Echoing Young and Smith, Lee declared this matter “beyond debate.” They all want it to be beyond debate. Because this is a debate that, if held rationally among members of society at large, they would lose.

Toward the end of her interview with Macarenko, Young implied that critics of the new B.C. pronoun policy were guilty of “hate speech” – even though she admitted that she hadn’t “read either” of the articles about the policy by Farsai. Finally, as if what she’d already said hadn’t been disturbing enough, Young closed by charging that the critics of the new policy were, by doing so, taking inappropriate advantage of their freedom of speech – which, she declared, as if it were the most obvious of truths, has its limits.

Even at that point, Macarenko chose not to push back. As the interview wound up, one thing was clear: these two were a tag team. Their common purpose was to send out the message that this pronoun decree is the new orthodoxy. Today B.C., tomorrow the world: dissent at your peril! If you do, you’ll be laughed at, accused of hate speech – and, if the enforcers of the new orthodoxy get their way, worse. Much worse.

US jury orders Tesla to pay ex-employee $137 million over racism

Interracial Marriage

A jury in California on Monday ordered Tesla to pay a Black former employee $137 million in damages for turning a blind eye to racism the man encountered at the firm’s auto plant in Fremont, US media reported.

“Tesla’s progressive image was a facade papering over its regressive, demeaning treatment of African-American employees,” the court filing said.

Diaz alleged that despite complaints to supervisors, Tesla took no action over the regular racist abuse.

The jury at the federal court in San Francisco on Monday awarded Diaz $130 million in punitive damages and $6.9 million for emotional distress, Bloomberg News reported, citing one of Diaz’s attorneys, Lawrence Organ of the California Civil Rights Law Group.

“We’re just gratified that the jury saw the truth and they awarded an amount that hopefully will push Tesla to correct what people testified about in terms of this widespread racist conduct,” Organ told the Washington…

View original post 106 more words

Dr. Carrie Madej: First U.S. Lab Examines “Vaccine” Vials, HORRIFIC Findings Revealed

Dr. Carrie Madej joined Stew Peters today and appeared obviously shook by what she had seen after examining Moderna and J&J “vaccine” vials.

Dr Carrie Madej joins Stew Peters to describe the incredibly creepy things she found when she put the contents of the vials from three different batches of the Moderna and the Johnson & Johnson vaccines under a microscope.

Dr Madej describes what appeared to be self-assembling synthetic biology and these horrific, seemingly sentient microscopic tentacled organisms and brilliant colors emanating from some of these graphene-like structures, which nanotechnology experts told her may be indicative of a superconducting material.

If it is so that the vaxx contents are superconductive, then based on what she was told at these shady “business owner” meetings that she was invited to attend in Atlanta and based on what she’s read about a project Bill Gates is currently orchestrating in West Africa, through GAVI, MasterCard and TrustStamp, an AI-powered biometrics company, they are building out a system that ties your vaccine status and medical records to a digital ID and a digital currency system, that they’re calling the “Wellness Pass”.

She says the African test subjects can only obtain money through their digital ID and MasterCard and that cash has been completely abolished. The intention is to perfect this system in Africa before launching it globally.

At the meetings she had attended in Atlanta, they plainly stated their intention to secretly implement a technology that can monitor and control the behavior of the populace, in conjunction with a Pavlovian social credit system and “Predictive Policing” and that is exactly what this Bill Gates project is doing.


“First, it looked just translucent and then, as time went on, over two hours, colors appeared, which, I’d never seen anything like this. There wasn’t a chemical reaction happening. It was like a brilliant blue and a royal purple, a yellow and sometimes green. These colors appearing, I did not know what that was.

“After investigating more, a superconducting material can do that with white light emitted to it. A superconducting material would be something like an injectable computing system.

“Anyhow, these fibers were appearing more and more. Some of the fibers had a cube structure on them…and also metallic fragments were in there. They were not metallic fragments I’m used to seeing. They were exotic. They’re very opaque…

“All the particulates, all these colors started to move to the edge and there was self-assembling going on. Things were growing…They looked synthetic and then, there was one particular, I’d say, object or organism – I’m not sure what to call it, that had tentacles coming from it and it was able to lift itself up off the…glass slide.”

Stew interjects, “It was alive?”

“It appeared, yeah,” she replies. “It appeared to be self-aware or be able to grow or move in space.  All I can tell you is this is not something they taught us in medical school. Nothing in my laboratories, nothing that I’ve seen before and I have shown this to other people in the field and they don’t know what it is, either.

“And I thought, when I first saw this, I kept looking at it over and over again and a colleague with me and we both thought, wow, this almost appears like it’s self-aware, like it knows we’re watching it. It’s just an intuition, a feeling of mine but it was very upsetting and so after two-and-a-half hours, everything was destroyed, of course.

“And I thought, maybe that was a fluke, in a way. Maybe that was just that one vial. And so, just recently, the lab was able to get more vials and same manufacturer but a different batch, of course; looking at it the same way under the compound microscope – and ANOTHER ONE of those tentacle-like structures appeared…

“I was also able to look at the contents of a Johnson & Johnson vial, and there was definitely a substance that looked like graphene. They all had graphene-like structures in there. Whether or not they were, I don’t have the capability of testing them in this lab but that it what they appeared to be.

“They had fatty substances, like a sticky glue-like substance that would be considered a hydrogel in both of them. So that means they’re lying. They’re lying to us about the Johnson & Johnson not having nano lipid particles or anything of that substance in there but it does.

“And in the Johnson & Johnson, they also had colors appear. Their colors were different. They had like a fluorescent pastel kind of color. Again, a lot of synthetic structures in there, as well. In the Johnson & Johnson, more spherical ring structures were there, a lot of sphere structures.

“I’m describing what I’m seeing but I’ve never seen anything like this before! They’re not supposed to be in these injections they’re falsely calling vaccines. What are they going to do to somebody? What are they going to do to a child? I started crying when I saw these a second time through the microscope, because it was a confirmation of everything I saw the first time. What will happen?”

Stew says, “If I was looking through a microscope at something that was supposed to promote health and safety and some self-aware tentacle-equipped creature started moving, I would probably run out of the laboratory. That’s just me. I’m not scared of a lot but that seems scary that is going into the blood of global citizens and you’re right, they want to push this into our children.”

Dr Madej continues, “This was about 400X magnification. So we don’t have more information than that but people really need to really, really, really stop and think about what is happening right now and it doesn’t make sense. If it doesn’t make sense, don’t rush to a decision that you could regret.

“Something’s not right in the world, I think we all know that, right now and to me, it’s definitely on the level of a spiritual warfare.

“Looking at at it under the microscope, absolutely pushes me, inspires me to make more of these videos, if we can get the lab to get these samples to do that in real time, so you can actually see what we’re doing; to have proof of, ‘Yes, this is happening. This is what we are seeing,’ so you, yourself can see what is happening under the microscope.”

Stew then asks, “Before you started talking about the self-aware whatever it is that lifted itself up off of the glass, you mentioned something about an injectable computing system. What do you make of that?”

“When colors just appeared in the solution – I’m talking about, there’s no color or very little – all of a sudden, the most brilliant blue, the most brilliant yellow, the brilliant purple appeared and more and more and more, over time, I’ve never seen anything be able to do that besides if you added another substrate for a chemical reaction. You know, it has to react with something. I didn’t know what could do that. 

“And so I started to talk to some nanotech engineers and genetic engineers and they told me the only thing they knew of that could do that was a white light, which, a white light did hit it – the microscope has a white light.

“A white light, over time will make the reaction on a superconducting material. Superconducting is like a injectable computing system. So this is where the electronic components can become visible under white light, so you know where they are. 

“So, this is proof that they are putting an operating system inside people. This happened in both the Moderna and the Johnson & Johnson samples that we observed. So we’re getting pieces of evidence put together, one by one by one by one but everything is pointing to the very ominous endpoint of this is the beginning or the advent of transhumanism or this is the beginning or the advent of being able to have surveillance and spying done on people, just like Bill Gates says he’s doing right now in West Africa.

“People need to remember that the Gates Foundation, or at least Bill Gates and GAVI, his companies, working with MasterCard and TrustStamp, an artificial intelligence program; testing it on the people of West Africa, with their COVID vaccines – injections, I should say; giving them a digital ID. They can only get their monetary funds through the digital ID and Mastercard, no other way, no cash, nothing. And all of their medical records; all their information downloaded into this digital format in their body.

“And this program, this research experiment they’re doing on the people, they said that if this substance is inside of them, this hydrogel substance, why don’t we use it for surveillance and predictive policing? We are! We’re going to use it for surveillance and predictive policing on the people of West Africa right now.

“They’ve been doing this since July of 2020 and they said once they have it perfected, they would like to unveil it to all the developed nations. And what are they calling it? The ‘Wellness Pass’, which is also known as a vaccine passport.

“So how do they do that, Stew? They have to put something inside your body to monitor you and know everything that you’re doing. So people need to wake up. What could they put inside your body for that to happen? How would they do it?

“I think Gates is already admitting to us how he’s doing it or how he wants to do it. How much does it take? I don’t know. I just know that I’m seeing these things with my own eyes, things that don’t make sense, things that look like they…are the advent of starting something of artificial intelligence inside the human body.

“And we know that the people in charge aren’t trustworthy, at all. We know they’ve lied many times to us and manufacturers have lied many times to us. So this is the time…we don’t take this anymore. We don’t take this kind of oppression and suppression. We’re better than that. We are children of God, if we choose to be, right? I, for one will not stand for it.”

Dr Madej promises to return to Stew’s show when she is able to obtain video of her next microscope investigations of the vaxx.


Dr Jane Ruby joins Stew Peters to discuss the findings of Dr Robert O Young, published on August 20th, entitled, “Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in CoV-19 Vaccines”.

This report should be considered a warning to anyone considering the jab.

Dr Young is a microscopy expert who published his findings, complete with images, after examining the contents of the four publicly-available COVID-19 jabs with various microscopy methods, including Phase Contrast Microscopy, Transmission and Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy.

He determined that the vials contain graphene oxide and nano-sized particles of stainless steel and other toxic metals, which we had already been hearing about, starting with Dr Ruby’s appearances with Stew Peters in early June.

She cited papers published by the NIH about “Manipulative magnetic nanomedicine” as “the future of COVID-19 pandemic therapy” and about SPIONs or Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles, in which a magnetic field is placed in and around the lipid-nanoparticle envelope surrounding the mRNA, to drive the spike protein manufacturing technology deep into your cells.

We get a bit more information here about how that mechanism might work from Dr Young’s report. He says the Johnson & Johnson vaccine contains particles composed of stainless steel that are stuck together with a “carbon-based glue” of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) that induce pathological blood coagulation through the continuous degeneration of cell membranes.

Dr Young’s most shocking finding, by far is that the vaccines contain the lethal tropical parasite, Trypanosoma cruzi, a microorganism endemic to Latin America that causes Chagas disease.

September 7th can’t come soon enough, when Pfizer is obliged to deliver the complete ingredient list of the vaxx to the FDA, because right now, it looks like the “vaccine” is a deadly cocktail of graphene oxide, SPIONS, spike protein-producing synthetic mRNA and a tropical parasite that causes chronic disease and death!

Dr Ruby says numerous labs are now attempting to confirm or discredit these results.


The implications of Dr Young’s discovery of Trypanosoma Cruzi parasites in the vials are that we may now view the myriad crippling “vaccine side effects” and even the “multi-organ” effects of “Long-Haul COVID” in a new light, when we understand that some of these symptoms might be related to the early stages of chronic Chagas disease.

The T. cruzi single-celled parasite burrows into human tissue to feed on blood. After 4-8 weeks, the infection becomes Chagas disease, an incurable chronic condition with very few symptoms for years until the the organs become so scarred and damaged by the tiny parasites, that it causes heart disease and digestive complications. Chagas disease has no cure and the symptoms can only be managed.

In nature, T. cruzi is usually introduced into the host via the bite of various species of “kissing bugs”. Although the insect vector was eliminated in many countries, it continued to be spread via blood transfusions and organ transplants until 15-20 years ago.

Chagas disease occurs in two stages: 1) Acute stage, which develops one to two weeks after the insect bite, and; 2) Chronic stage, which develops over many years.

In 1–5% of infected individuals, the acute phase can cause life-threatening fluid accumulation around the heart, or inflammation of the heart or brain and surrounding tissues. (Where have we heard that before?)

Unless treated with anti-parasitic drugs, individuals remain chronically-infected with T. cruzi after recovering from the acute phase.

Over decades, 30–40% of people develop organ dysfunction, the most common of which is heart disease. People with Chagas heart disease often experience heart palpitations and sometimes fainting, due to irregular heart function.


I do not mean to add to the confusion about the fake pandemic, with its origins in a bioweapons program – or to its attendant forced “vaccine”, with its its Nuremberg Code-violating lack of informed consent.

However, we have long suspected that the PCR test statistics-driven plandemic was a ruse to “vaccinate the entire planetary population”, to quote Bill Gates and we have since learned that the so-called “vaccine” actually contains a more concentrated form of the weaponized spike protein than the “virus” it’s supposed to treat.

Would those seeking to create bioweapons stop at a respiratory tract-infecting coronavirus? T. cruzi can survive freezing and thawing, allowing it to persist in whole blood and blood products.

An organism like T. cruzi might be a handy in a bioweapons arsenal.

Is the composition of the Franken Clot Shot even more diabolical than we thought?

As Stew says, “This sounds like an intentionally-manufactured cocktail of lethal ingredients being injected forcefully into people in certain places, coerced in other places. People are losing their jobs if they don’t get this thing and they want to lower the age group to 5 years old, to inject as many kids with this thing as possible.

“And Australia, led 24,000 people – kids – unaccompanied by parents or adults into a former sports arena, now turned into the modern-day ‘ovens’ to inject these kids, multiples of which, we have unconfirmed reports are dead. Parents are coming forward, people are upset about this, understandably.

He asks Dr Ruby, “Would you suspect that there would be any medical – any justifiable medical benefit to a cocktail made of these ingredients?”

She shakes her head in the negative, “There’s no disclosure. There’s no informed consent consideration provided to the people that are being forced to take this – ”

Stew interrupts, “Consideration means, nothing anymore. They’re not even a part of considering, in many cases whether or not they are given the choice to take this.

“They are just being told, ‘Take it or be out of a job. Take it or be court-martialed,’ in the military. ‘Go to jail. Go to the brig if you don’t take this thing.’”