A major “Islamophobic” incident has taken place in Canada. The National Post explains:
An Ontario legislator is racking up online praise for his response to Islamophobic remarks directed at him at MuslimFest over the weekend. A video posted online and viewed more than 250,000 times shows NDP Gurratan Singh, who represents the riding of Brampton East, responding to a man’s anti-Muslim remarks at the event in Mississauga, Ont. In the video, Singh tells the man that he condemns racism.
But what did this man, whose name is Stephen Garvey, actually say to garner this kind of attention, scorn, and charges of “racism” and “Islamophobia”? He asked the provincial politician Gurratan Singh whether he supported “political Islam” or “sharia law.” That’s it.
Let’s look at a comparable example about the subject matter of hate speech and racism, as this is the second time in less than a week that such a topic has made national headlines in Canada.
Several days ago, Jihad Watch ran the first such piece, which was about a Canadian federal Liberal candidate who spewed hatred against Jews. Liberal Party candidate and prominent religious leader Hassan Guillet was busted by B’nai Brith for his history of antisemitic comments, and only upon a public outcry was he dumped by the Liberals as a candidate.
Here is what was said about him:
- Guillet referred to Israel as an “apartheid state,” with no justification for this claim. Imagine if someone said that Islamic states are apartheid states, based on their supremacist values.
- “In January of 2017, Guillet celebrated the release of Raed Salah, a Hamas-aligned activist who has accused Jews of staging the 9/11 terror attacks and has claimed that Jews use children’s blood for baking holy bread.”
- Guillet hailed Salah as a “jihad-fighter” and “frontier-fighter” whom “Allah will surely support.” Guillet congratulated Salah “on being freed from ‘the prisons of occupied Palestine,’ and prayed that he will some day be successful in the fight to liberate ‘the whole of Palestine.’”
Something is dreadfully wrong when a so-called respectable religious leader gets away with spewing dangerous, racist and hateful statements against Jews for so long, and is subsequently accepted by the federal governing party as a political candidate. Meanwhile, the media and certain politicians jump on the back of a citizen simply for asking questions about the sharia and political Islam.
The media generally ran with a narrative about Garvey’s remarks being “Islamophobic” and what a big hero Singh was for keeping his composure under the strain of Garvey’s “racism.” The media also went on about how Singh made his brother, federal NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh, so proud. Notice, however, that Singh never addressed Garvey’s concerns about sharia or political Islam, but instead dismissed him with name-calling (“racist”), which escalated an already volatile situation. When Garvey was accused of being racist by Gurratan Sigh, he shouted– “I am not racist. I am not racist.” The media dismissed this as special pleading, but in fact concern about sharia is not racist.
While every Western society should continue to fight the ills of racism (including racism between visibly minority groups and religious discrimination and supremacism), there needs to be caution about crying wolf. Let’s be fair and ask the question: what was “hateful,” “racist” and “Islamophobic” about Garvey’s questions? Maybe Garvey can be accused of disrupting a peaceful event, given the scene he created, and there were also unverified accusations that Garvey was disparaging toward police in his rage that followed the incident, but creating a scene is outside the domain of whether Garvey should be categorized as a “racist” or “Islamophobic.”
Garvey was also accused of ignorance in mistaking a Sikh for a Muslim. This sometimes happens, but there is no actual evidence that Garvey did confuse the two. He was directing his question about sharia to a politician, which is valid in itself, and does not indicate that he assumed that the politician was Muslim. Sharia has been a longstanding concern in Canada: back in 2003, then-Ontario Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty declared after a long brouhaha concerning religious arbitration in Ontario that “there will be no Sharia law in Ontario….there will be one law for all Ontarians.” The question about sharia is no less relevant today.
It is unjustifiable to immediately judge Garvey as a “racist” because he inquired about Singh’s position on political Islam and sharia. Garvey, like many others, has now experienced being tried and convicted of “hate,” “racism” and “Islamophobia” in the court of public opinion by the media, the Singh brothers, and other Canadians who have surrendered to political correctness and identity politics. Such capitulation comes at a high cost for those who value the rule of law and freedom, and especially for the significant number of immigrants who have escaped countries where political strife based on religion is mainstream, disruptive, and even abusive and violent