Lori Day at Lori Day Consulting in Newburyport, MA “Well, I’ve decided the Earth needs a Mandemic. The human herd must be culled, and it’s time for buck season.”

http://archive.is/A88ia

 

What can be done? Well, I’ve decided the Earth needs a Mandemic. The human herd must be culled, and it’s time for buck season.
I know what you’re thinking… Cool! How could this work?
I happened to be watching an episode of Star Trek: Voyager last night when the idea came to me. There could be a virus that causes gene mutations in men that rewrites their DNA. Then, when men have sex with women, they are drained of their DNA, “where it is then implanted into females, causing the death of the males. As a result, new males are constantly created and harvested” by women, as suits their needs. You should have seen the desiccated corpses on the Taresian planet!
 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
parents contact Lori Day and politely ask her why is she calling for male genocide  and how is this not affecting her work in helping children.

From LinkedIn profile…

  • 1987-1991: School psychologist in various public schools
  • 1998-2001: Undergraduate Admissions Committee, MIT
  • 2001-2008: Director of Admissions and Financial Aid at the Fenn School, which is a boys’ school.
  • 2008-2010: Head, Odyssey Day School
  • 2010- Freelance consultant
linkedDIN profile is archived
From Lori day Consulting’s website

Welcome to Lori Day Consulting!

Planning your child’s education can bring feelings of both excitement and uncertainty. I have worked in the field of education for over 25 years, serving in varied roles in public schools, private schools, and at the college level. My work with students has spanned the years from preschool through young adulthood in traditional academic settings, alternative programs, and special needs placements. I am an educational psychologist by training, and have also spent many years as a private school admissions director, head of school, and teacher. My consulting clients come from Massachusetts and many other locations within the US and abroad. Guiding parents of children with a wide range of learning profiles, I help place kids in schools that best meet their academic, social and emotional needs, whether they are gifted, educationally challenged, or solidly average students. I also assist parents in understanding their children’s learning styles and advocating for them within their schools. As a parent myself, I personally understand the practical and emotional needs of parents and children as they embark upon their own unique educational journeys. I am well known in the private school world through my former position as Admissions & Financial Aid Director at The Fenn School in Concord, Massachusetts.  While I maintain an active network and many friends and professional contacts in Concord, I am now living in Newburyport, MA.

Please fill out the contact form on my website to set up a free initial consultation and discussion of your child’s needs.

Fill out my form below or call me for your free consultation.

I will spend 30 minutes with you to discuss your child’s needs.

In today’s world of imperfect digital communication, if you suspect an email or contact form has not arrived, feel free to call anytime.

Phone: (978) 572-0356

Fax: (651) 691-2926

Address: 18 Orange Street, Newburyport, MA 01950

E-mail: lday@loridayconsulting.com

 

Feminist Current and Meghan Murphy Calling for male genocide

Feminist Current is run by racist and feminist cunt Meghan Murphy

http://archive.is/A88ia

the writer of the article in question is Lori Day “What can be done? Well, I’ve decided the Earth needs a Mandemic. The human herd must be culled, and it’s time for buck season”

 

the racist cunt Meghan Murphy in the comments below the article “So men are just choosing to continue to rape women and girls for fun? Yet you think we SHOULDN’T kill ’em off with some kind of virus?”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jewish student kicked, called “Zionist pig” during an anti-Israel protest in Toronto

http://en.cijnews.com/?p=38374

18 year old high school student was harassed and kicked by anti-Israel protesters after he staged a defiant one-man counter-protest in front of Metro Toronto Convention Centre which hosted former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres and former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger at the Canadian Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Centre for Holocaust Studies Spirit of Hope gala on May 26, 2016.

The protest, organized by Actions4Palestine and endorsed by Independent Jewish Voices (IJV) – Toronto, Students Against Israeli Apartheid (SAIA) York, International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network (IJAN)-Canada, Stop the Jewish National Fund (JNF)-Canada, UofT Trans Inclusivity Project (TIP), Coalition Against Israeli Apartheid (CAIA), Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights (SPHR) McMaster, United Network for Justice and Peace in Palestine and Israel (UNJPPI), SAIA (UofT) and the Communist Party of Canada.

On their Facebook page the organizers wrote that Shimon Peres is the “former Prime Minister & President of Apartheid Israel, whose extensive list of atrocities include serving in the Haganah, a Zionist Militia that massacred Palestinians during 1948-1952, the planning and execution of the Qana Massacre in Lebanon; the killing of Palestinians during the Aqsa uprising; involvement in the massacre of Jenin and gave the green light for Israel’s violent incursion against besieged Gaza in February of 2008.”

Jordan Justein walked with an Israeli flag in front of a small group of fewer than 30 communists, radical anti-Israel Jews and a few Arabs who waved PLO and Communist flags, robotically chanted “free free Palestine”, waved signs denouncing Israeli “war crimes” and denounced Peres and Kissinger. The group included at least one member of Palestine House, which was de-funded by the previous Conservative government for its “pattern of support for extremism”.

Jordan told CIJnews that when he arrived at the protest, a police officer told him to move away from the Convention Centre for security reasons, and to stand closer to the anti-Israel crowd.

The officer also warned him that simply being at the demonstration with an Israeli flag could “incite a riot”. When Jordan moved across the street, the protesters swore at him, called him a “Zionist pig”, a “Zionist piece of sh*t”, a “kike” and a “provocateur”. A man with a Palestinian flag kicked him twice in the leg and told him to leave. When Jordan described the incident to the police, he was told to go and file a report.

Jordan explained to CIJnews that he staged the one-man counter-protest “because both my grandparents are Holocaust survivors, and as a young person I feel it’s my responsibility to stand up against anti-Semitism and for Israel”.

Toronto: some “women may even enjoy being beaten as a sign of love”

http://en.cijnews.com/?p=38431

 

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau espouses a principled policy for the elimination of violence against women.“Violence against women is a violation of the most basic human rights. It destroys lives, tears families apart, impacts entire communities, and has no place within our society,” Trudeau said in a official statementissued on November, 25 2015.

“As leaders, as parents, as community members, we need to make sure we are combating misogyny in all its forms, wherever it is found,” he added. “I urge all Canadians to make a commitment to stopping violence against women and girls… Together, we can create a Canada and a world where all citizens are respected, valued equally, and safe from violence.”

“We all have an important role to play in stopping violence against women and girls, and in denouncing misogyny in all its forms,” Trudeau emphasized in another statement (December 6, 2015). “Sadly on any given day in Canada, approximately 8,000 women and children are housed in shelters, largely for reasons of abuse.”

On March, 8 2016, Trudeau issued a statement on the occasion of International Women’s Day, in which he reiterated his commitment to fight gender-based violence against women. “It is unacceptable that in 2016, women are still denied an education, forced into an early marriage, or made victims of gender-based violence. As leaders, as parents, as community members, upholding women’s rights should be – and must be – a priority for us all.”

CIJnews investigation has revealed that a Muslim Dawah (propagating Islam) group operating a booth at Toronto’s Dundas Square continues unopposed to these days to hand out a book condoning wife beating in certain circumstances.

The book “Women in Islam & Refutation of some Common Misconceptions,” authored by the Saudi scholar Dr. Abdul-Rahman al-Sheha and printed by the Saudi Dawah organization Muslim World League (رابطة العالم الاسلامي), was also distributed in 2015 by York MSA female students at the Central Square of York University.

 

 

The following are excerpts from the book:

Polygamy in the Islamic society is limited to four wives only, the marriages being performed lawfully with a proper marriage contract, witnesses, etc. The man must bear all financial burdens and responsibilities to his wives and children that arise from his marriages. All the children are legitimate, who must be raised and cared for under the responsibility of both parents…

Wife Discipline

Allah, the Exalted, stated in the Glorious Qur’an: “(… As to those women on whose part you see ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (next,) refuse to share their beds, (and last,) beat them (lightly, if it is useful). But if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of annoyance). Surely, Allah is Most High, Most Great.) [4:34]

“Islam forbids beating women and warns strictly against it. The Prophet (Peace be upon Him) never beat any of his wives or servants, as his wife Aishah (may Allah exalt their mention) reported in an authentic tradition (Bukhari #2328). Women are, in general, weaker than men in their physique and stamina. Women are often unable to defend themselves against violence. Although beating of women is generally forbidden, Islam permits the beating of wives in a restricted and limited sense only as a final solution and acceptable valid reason when all else fails. This is analogous to spanking children when all else fails and they must learn a lesson in obedience for their own protection and success.

“In the verse we quoted, Allah deals with the case of a wife who behaves immorally towards her husband’s rights. The treatment of this extremely sensitive issue comes in gradual stages, as we have noticed from the verse. Medicine, or treatment of any ailment, can be very bitter at times. But an ill person will take the remedy gladly and bear the bitterness of the medicine in order to be cured from his illness. The remedy to treat a wife blameworthy of immoral behavior, as we have noticed, comes in three gradual stages:

“1. First stage: The stage of advice, counseling and warning against Allah’s punishment. A husband must remind his wife of the importance of protecting his rights in Islam. This stage is a very kind and easy one. But, if this treatment does not work and proves to be ineffective, then the husband may resort to the next stage.

“2. Second stage: To leave the wife’s bed. Or, if one sleeps in the same bed with her, he will turn his back to her, not touch her, talk to her or have intercourse with her. This stage, as noticed, combines both strictness and kindness, although it is a very harsh practice on both. But, if this treatment does not work, then the husband may resort to the final stage of discipline explained below.

“3. Third and final stage: Beating without hurting, breaking a bone, leaving black or blue marks on the body, and avoiding hitting the face or especially sensitive places at any cost. The purpose of beating her is only to discipline and never retaliation or with desire to hurt by any means. Islam forbids severe beating as punishment.

“The Prophet (Peace be upon Him) said: “None of you should beat his wife like a slave-beating and then have intercourse with her at the end of the day”. [Bukhari #4908]

This treatment is proved to be very effective with two types of women, as psychologists have determined:

“The first type: Strong willed, demanding and commandeering women. These are the type of women who like to control, master and run the affairs of their husbands by pushing them around, commanding them and giving them orders.

“The second type: Submissive or subdued women. These women may even enjoy being beaten at times as a sign of love and concern

“Beating, according to the Islamic teachings, is listed as the last and final stage of disciplining methods. Islam does not permit, allow or even condone beating unless the first two stages are proven to be ineffective. Moreover, beating must not be employed as a remedy, if a wife prefers to be divorced.

“The three stages of discipline stated in the verse of the Glorious Qur’an are only meant to be a means of discipline for the protection of the family unit. One form of destruction of a family is when the wife becomes a victim of divorce. Islam aims to relieve unnecessary pains, problems and conflicts…

On Honor Killings

“In some traditional and tribal custom based societies, custom gives the male such a dominant role that if the honor of his womenfolk are perceived, even without proper verification, to have been violated by an action of promiscuity on her part, the man kills her to protect his honor. This situation has been hyped up in the media because some unscrupulous people who continue to do this and others who allow it to continue.

“The answer to this is simple. To begin with, people are not allowed to take the law into their own hands and punish in this manner based on unverified accusations of promiscuity, as the rules of testimony in Islam are very strict. Therefore, this is a direct violation of the Islamic law. If the court assesses the case as an outright premeditated murder, after considering all circumstances and receiving proofs conclusively, it becomes punishable by the Islamic law of equity and retribution in cases of premeditated murder.

“The unfortunate reality is that because secular laws are in place in these countries, and because politicians appease tribal and other leaders for political advantages, these unjust customs are allowed to continue. If the Islamic laws were established and executed, the severe punishments for fornication, adultery, murder, etc, would satisfy the Muslim population; that justice has been done, and this would curtail the sense of vengeance that one needs to have recourse to

Testimony of Women

“Allah, the Exalted, stated in the Glorious Qur’an: And get two witnesses out of your own men. And if there are not two men (available), then a man and two women, such as you agree for witnesses, so that if one of them (two women) errs, the other can remind her. [2:282]

“Allah clarifies to assure the rights of others that testimonies will not be valid unless two men, or one man and two women offer them.

“Divine wisdom has granted women, in general, very sensitive emotions, tender feelings, and a predisposition towards care and love of other members of the family. This makes a woman capable of her natural task of childbearing, nursing, taking care of all the needs of the young child, etc. Based on these emotional characteristics of the woman, she might very well follow her emotional inclinations and swerve from harsh realities due to an emotional involvement in a case. A woman’s loving and kind feelings might overcome what she has witnessed, and thus she may distort the story of her witness and testimony. At the same time the biological changes that occur in her body due to menses, pregnancy, child-birth and post-natal conditions reduce the sharpness of her memory and may make her forget the details of the issue. Therefore, a divine precautionary measure was established to eliminate any shortcoming on a woman’s part in any case of testimony. We would like to point out here one of the essential principles of the legal and judicial system in Islam, which states that the case is not valid for proceedings if a doubt arises in the case. Therefore, the strength of two female witnesses is intended to eliminate this doubt.

“Besides testimony that involves other people’s rights, Islam has granted women full financial freedom in terms of independence and financial decision-making, and made her exactly equal to men in that regard. However, woman’s natural role in life, in raising children and caring for the family requires her to stay in the home for longer and extended periods in comparison to men, thus limiting her knowledge and experience to the affairs she stays involved most of her life…

Travel Without a Male Guardian

“The Prophet (Peace be upon Him) said: “A woman must not travel alone without a mahram. No man may enter the house of a woman unless there is a mahram with her.”

“A man stood up and asked Allah’s Prophet (Peace be upon Him): “O Messenger of Allah! My wife is going on Hajj ( pilgrimage), while I want to participate in a battle, what should I do?” The Prophet of Allah (Peace be upon Him) said: “Go out with her.” [Bukhari #1763]

For the protection of the person and honor of women, the Islamic rule encompassed in this tradition forbids any woman, whether she be young or old, single or married, to travel alone without (mahram) as a travel companion. This man must be of those to whom she is permanently prohibited to marry due to their close blood relationship, such as a father, a brother, an uncle, an elder son or nephew after he has reached puberty, or a husband, etc. Some people might say that this regulation restricts the freedom of the woman and her basic right of movement. The purpose of this rule is not to prevent her ravel but to free her from harm and molestation, and thus to maintain and preserve her right of dignity.

“Traveling entails many hardships and dangers, and since women are physically weaker than men, and moreover she may have circumstances of pregnancy, menses, nursing and childcare, or some ailments, she is in more need of help and service. Also women are generally more emotional and impressionable; they are more susceptible to unscrupulous and characterless men in search of victims. The Prophet of Allah (Peace be upon Him) expressed this most eloquently when he said to a man singing travel songs with a beautiful masculine voice in order to help the steady movement of the riding and pack animals, as per the custom of travelers:

“Go gently, O Anjashah, you’re urging on the delicate glassware.” [Bukhari #5857]

“The phrase “delicate glassware” describes the fragileness and softness of the women’s nature, who were the riders in that caravan, easily broken or disturbed.

“There are, as we all know, wicked minded, evil and violent men who lurk about and seek to take advantage of women whom they find susceptible, gullible or traveling alone. Such wicked-minded men are of course either interested in robbery, trickery, seduction, or rape. Therefore, a woman is very much in need of someone to care for, protect and fulfill her special needs while traveling, providing her the needed security, service and attention to help her in the difficulties and ward off strangers and potential predators. The “mahram” of a woman in Islam protects and serves with utmost sincerity since this is a natural obligation on him, rewarded by Allah (The Almighty).

“We find that many civilizations have similar rules about escorting women in travel, but often they allow other than the “mahram” to escort her since they do not differentiate between a “mahram” and a “non-mahram” in their cultures, which results in terrible stories. Therefore, and upon this line of reasoning,forbidding a woman to travel alone, and mandating a male escort who must be a “mahram”, is not in any way a humiliating restriction or insult to her abilities, but, in fact, is an honor that she is served, protected and given companionship by a male escort who has to give her preference over his personal matters and needs.”

The First Blast of the Trumpet: Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women 1558

John Knox


Extracted from: Selected Writings of John Knox: Public Epistles, Treatises, and Expositions to the Year 1559


Editor’s Note

The First Blast of the Trumpet is, perhaps, Knox’s most famous and controversial work. In the twentieth century, few people have read the book, and still fewer have made an attempt to understand the reformer’s position.

For Knox, the teaching of scripture alone is sufficient to prove that women should not bear rule over men. The testimony of scripture is so plain, he wrote, that “to add anything were superfluous, were it not that the world is almost now come to that blindness, that whatsoever pleases not the princes and the multitude, the same is rejected as doctrine newly forged, and is condemned for heresy” (p. 390).

Knox knew that his 16th-century opponents expected citations from classical and patristic sources. Therefore, the reformer takes aim at both the position and polemical methods of his critics by quoting some of the stoutest comments imaginable, refuting the government of women. Whether Knox personally joins with the ancient authors in every detail is immaterial; by numerous references to antiquity, the reformer demonstrates that there is a venerable history of opposition to the rule of women. Still, Knox points out that his main argument, even if stripped of the patristic citations, is fundamentally based upon the authoritative word of God. “For as I depend not upon the determinations of men, so I think my cause no weaker, albeit their authority is denied unto me; provided that God by his revealed will, and manifest word, stands plain and evident on my side” (p. 400).

Contemporary readers should also recall that, when Knox speaks of “nature,” he is often making reference to human nature. Even so, he states, “this part of nature is not my most sure foundation” (p. 385). Again, his principal concern is with the revealed will of God, written in the Bible.

The treatise was published in Geneva in 1558. As indicated in the preface, the work was published anonymously. The author wished to conceal his identity, until he had issued two more blasts, intending to disclose his name with the publication of the Third Blast. The reformer’s plan to write two sequels remained unfulfilled, although he later published a summary of the contents which he proposed to treat in theSecond Blast. The summary of the Second Blast was appended originally to his Appellation (1558), but readers will find this summary following the First Blast in the present volume (pages 435-36).

 

 

more is at

http://www.swrb.com/newslett/actualNLs/firblast.htm