Taiwan, China not settled on transit flight issues


TAIPEI — Taiwan’s proposal for Beijing to allow international flights from the mainland to make transit stops in Taiwan remains in limbo, as Taiwan’s top China policymaker said Sunday that talks with the Chinese side on the issue are still underway.

Asked about the progress of the talks, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) replied that “the two sides are still negotiating and communicating with each other actively on the issue,” hoping they can reach a consensus and strike a deal to begin the service as soon as possible.

The remarks cast uncertainty over the implementation of an agreement reached between MAC Minister Hsia Li-yan (夏立言) and his Chinese counterpart, Taiwan Affairs Minister Zhang Zhijun (張志軍), during their meeting in Taiwan’s Kinmen in May that the transit stops in Taiwan will begin in mid-2015.

The issue was set to be settled in a planned summit meeting between between Taiwan’s Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and its Chinese counterpart the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS) in August, when the two parties are expected to sign tax and aviation safety agreements. A newspaper report said Sunday that the meeting may not take place as expected.

The Chinese side has so far not set a concrete date for the beginning of the transit flight service, and that the issue remains stuck on China’s request for measures to be taken to “optimize” the flight routes between the two sides across Taiwan Strait, the United Daily News reported.

“There may likely be changes” to the planned SEF-ARATS meeting, which was scheduled to take place by the end of the month, the newspaper said.

Hsia had revealed during his visit to the United States in July that the meeting between the two intermediary bodies of the two sides of the strait was scheduled to take place by the end of August, and that he and Zhang would possibly meet for talks on matters of mutual concern in September.

Asked about the newspaper’s speculation, the MAC failed to give concrete answers but said that currently, the SEF and ARATS are sparing no efforts in preparing for their 11th summit meeting since 2008.

As for the planned Hsia-Zhang meeting, the MAC said the exact date of that event has not yet been settled, promising an announcement as soon as it reaches an agreement with China on the matter.

The authorities also said that transit stops in Taiwan are a different issue from “flight route optimization,” which China proposed as part of efforts to promote the efficiency and convenience of cross-strait flights.

One of the measures the Chinese side has suggested was to “straighten” the flight routes between the two sides, allowing the commercial flights from China to fly across the medium line of the Taiwan Strait to shorten flight times.

The Taiwan side had already made it clear that it is willing to exchange opinions with China on the proposal to “optimize” the flight services on the existing three air routes between the two sides, but “it is out of the question that Taiwan would agree on opening another route crossing the strait’s medium line” due to national security concerns, according to the MAC.

Feminist Tumblr: Don’t Even Ask





Ashley is @sailor_P00N on Twitter, where she advertises herself as “BIG GAY HATE MACHINE . . . I’m the feminist Rush warned you about.”

She has piercings in her right nostril and the middle of her upper lip. She shaves the sides of her head, she wears dramatic eye makeup, and she is obese. Her appearance over the years, Ashley says, has been “an exciting adventure.” Oh, did I mention that Ashley is obese? Because she mentions that a lot, the same way she mentions her lesbianism a lot. Of course, she’s got a Tumblr blog and her profile describes her as a “Fat femme lesbian feminist.” More than an attitude, this is an ideology:

So-called “fat-positive feminism” is a movement that “addresses how misogyny and sexism intersect with sizism and anti-fat bias.”

This movement has been analyzed by Women’s Studies professors who invoke “neo-Gramscian theories of hegemony” to explain how “power hierarchies” contribute to the oppression of fat women:


Problematizing the existence of a singular, oppressive beauty standard has been a useful corrective to monochromatic understandings of gender inequality and oppression. However, the emphasis on feminine beauty and the body as a site of individual meaning and empowering play is prone to a naive self?determinism that assumes that women act completely voluntarily, thus minimizing corporate domination and the “normalizing power of cultural images” . . . The persistence of domination in the realm of beauty ideals raises serious questions for our two cases of beauty rebellion, as well as for the cultural turn in beauty analysis. Can resistance to beauty ideals rely on therapeutic, individually focused strategies, or must activists also target the institutions and material structures that support hegemonic beauty standards?

Feminist theory justifies Ashley’s view of her obesity as resistance to the “normalizing power” of “hegemonic beauty standards.” For feminists, obesity is not a personal problem, but a political issue in the same way that feminism, by a sort of theoretical alchemy, transforms lesbianism from an individual erotic preference to a revolutionary challenge. The lesbian feminist sees herself as a freedom fighter against heterosexuality, which is condemned as “the ideology of male supremacy.”

Feminism reframes psychological maladjustment (an individual’s inability to fit into normal adult life) as a critique of society. It is not the individual’s failure to adjust that is the problem, according to feminist theory. Rather, society’s definition of “normal” is inherently wrong and oppressive. Feminism insists that the misfit minority are justified in rejecting “socially constructed” expectations — the gender binary imposed by the heterosexual matrix, in Professor Judith Butler’s jargon — because the normal majority are beneficiaries of oppressive privilege exercised through Foucauldian discourses of power.

Are these ideas crazy? Well, I’ve been accused of ableism for using the word “crazy” to describe feminists who make a point of discussing their mental health problems. Feminists hurl labels like “ableism” at their critics in the same way Stalin’s enemies in the 1930s were accused of being “Trotskyist saboteurs.” Feminism is a non-falsifiable theory. Anything and everything can be cited as proof of women’s wrongful oppression by a male-dominated society. The correlation between feminism and mental illness (remember that Shulamith Firestone was a paranoid schizophrenic) therefore is construed by feminists as proof that (a) male supremacy inflicts psychological harm on women, or (b) psychiatric treatment is one of the mechanisms the patriarchy uses to control women, or (c) both. Whatever explanation she offers, no feminist is ever personally responsible for her own problems, because somewhere there is always a male scapegoat who deserves blame.

Therefore, when Ashley isn’t posting alluring selfies on her Tumblr, she’s on her “pop culture criticism” blog Pussy Goes Grrr, talking about being in a mental hospital for bipolar depression, an experience she interpreted through a feminist perspective:


I guess it was silly of me to think I’d be safe from sexism in the nut house. Beyond the fact that there’s an long history of institutional sexism in mental health facilities themselves, there’s a simple reason why I should’ve known better: men would be there. Men don’t stop participating in sexism or perpetuating microaggressions just because you’re all sick.
The most overt example was the man who told me how beautiful and sexy I was every chance he got. . . . Gross as his aggressive come-ons were, he was the easiest to deal with. His explicitness made it easy to report him to the techs. I felt his wide eyes moving over me even though he stopped speaking to me. I watched him move on to a patient who was more receptive to his grossness. . . . I was relieved that he’d stopped talking to me.
There were other men who were more difficult to deal with.

So, a man who was hospitalized for mental illness found Ashley “beautiful and sexy.” Ashley was released from the psychiatric ward last year, and yet heterosexual males continue to pose a threat to her:


it doesn’t f–king matter how “nicely” or “respectfully” you ask a lesbian out on a date if you’re a dude. it doesn’t matter how much you clearly express that you don’t have any expectations. that. doesn’t. f–king. matter.
because there is a social expectation and pressure for women to accept relationships with men. so even if you are being “nice” and “respectful” you are still creating a potentially coercive situation even if you are not intending to. there is an inherent power imbalance and when you disregard a lesbian’s sexuality (because i don’t care how respectful you are about it, you are still DISREGARDING their sexuality for your own feelings) you are disrespecting their identity and boundaries.
please understand how compulsory heterosexuality works. it’s not like a cold that you get over and suddenly you’re totally sure in your lesbianism. there is constant social pressure for women to include men in their sexuality and when you ask a lesbian out on a date you are an active participant in that. that is not respectful. That is not nice. there’s is literally no way to do such a thing respectfully.

Lesbianism is not a problem, heterosexuality is — that’s the bottom line of feminist gender theory. To invoke the title of a Women’s Studies textbook, Feminism Is Queer. Women like Ashley are under “constant social pressure . . . to include men in their sexuality,” and any male who expresses interest in any female is “creating a potentially coercive situation” because of society’s “compulsory heterosexuality.” A man who is attracted to Ashley is attempting to coerce her, so don’t even ask.

Men must never talk to Ashley, because there is “literally no way to do such a thing respectfully.” Men are “participating in sexism” simply by being heterosexual and they are “perpetuating microaggressions” if they talk to women. This kind of anti-male hostility (a characteric paranoia, “Fear and Loathing of the Penis”) provides the emotional basis of feminism, which is why it is impossible to debate a feminist.

Facts and logic can never refute emotions like hate, fear, envy and self-pity. It does no good to cite indicators of widespread opportunity for women (e.g., females are 57% of U.S. college students) nor to point to the examples of happy, successful women in society, because evidence cannot change the feminist’s feelings of victimhood.

“Feminist consciousness is consciousness of victimization . . . to come to see oneself as a victim.”
Sandra Bartky, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression (1990)

Her “consciousness” enables the feminist to evade responsibility for the problems in her life. Even to suggest that a woman could be responsible for her own unhappiness is to engage in “victim-blaming,” according to feminists. If a college girl gets so drunk that she doesn’t even remember having sex with a guy she met at a party, and her morning-after remorse leads her to claim she was raped, your skepticism — or even your belief that the accused should be entitled to due process — makes you a “rape denialist,” as feminists at Oberlin College branded Christina Hoff Sommers. (“A rape denialist is someone who denies the prevalence of rape and denies known causes of it,” they explained.) Of course, Dr. Sommers was not actually trying to deny anything. She was pointing out that the actual “prevalence of rape” is far lower than the deliberately exaggerated “1-in-5″ statistic promoted by feminists. Making such distinctions, however, is not possible in feminist rhetoric, because totalitarians don’t debate their critics, they silence them.

Feminists are always right, because shut up.

Whether they speak the crypto-Marxist dialectic of Catharine MacKinnon or the postmodern babble of Judith Butler, feminists always seek to “win” the argument by silencing opposition, so that feminism becomes the dominant ideology by asserting its authority as the only ideology. Thus, nothing is true unless feminists say it is true, and no analysis is valid unless it is a feminist analysis. This feminist Catch-22 has the effect not only of invalidating anything said by men (because they are men, and therefore, shut up) but also invalidates anything said by a woman who does not share “feminist consciousness.” Feminism becomes an echo chamber crowded with angry chattering lunatics because the voices of sanity are systematically excluded.

“Fat femme lesbian feminist” Ashley is an example of this principle of epistemic closure by which feminists separate themselves from explanations that do not conform to their ideology. Consider something she wrote six years ago when she was 19 and in college:

So, if it’s not obvious, I am an insanely neurotic individual. The kind of neurotic and paranoid that makes me believe that the wholly illogical is actually going to happen to me. Like oh, a pregnancy, despite the fact that I’m on birth control and haven’t had intercourse and haven’t had any semen anywhere near me. . . .
So, I could talk more about my deeply internalized fears of pregnancy and motherhood, the paralyzing terror I experience when faced with the idea of being pregnant and the ridiculous amount of neurosis involved with this (like how I used to be afraid I was pregnant before I was ever even in a relationship) but instead I’m going to take this opportunity to talk about how this has created a bit of a shift in my art.

Click to see her bizarre 2009 drawing “Motherhood.” This “insanely neurotic” phobia of pregnancy is a continuing theme of Ashley’s work, as in her 2011 cartoon series:

That last cartoon begins, “Loving sex while simultaneously being neurotically terrified of pregnancy seems like a conflict of interest,” and features Ashley’s “impressively long list of reasons why I don’t want kids,” including, “I hate kids,” “I would be a horrible mother,” “I’m emotionally unstable,” and “I have no maternal instincts.”

Which is to say, she’s a feminist.

Antipathy toward pregnancy and motherhood has been a core value of feminism for decades. In her 1970 book The Dialectic of Sex, Shulamith Firestone declared flatly, “Pregnancy is barbaric” (p. 180) and described motherhood as “a fundamentally oppressive biological condition” (p. 202). Fat lesbian Ashley has turned her persistent nightmares about pregnancy into artwork, but she is certainly not the only feminist who views her own reproductive anatomy as an existential menace.

“I don’t particularly like babies. They are loud and smelly and, above all other things, demanding . . . time-sucking monsters with their constant neediness. . . . I don’t want a baby. . . . Nothing will make me want a baby. . . . This is why, if my birth control fails, I am totally having an abortion.”
Amanda Marcotte, March 14, 2014

A frenzied horror toward the biological and natural consequences of human sexuality is abnormal. At least fat lesbian Ashley recognizes that she is “an insanely neurotic individual” for feeling that way, whereas Amanda Marcotte has no such self-awareness.

Are there men who find feminists attractive? Yes, and the scary thing is not all of those men are locked up in mental institutions.

P.S.: Ashley wants you to sign up for a contest to win a free vibrator, otherwise known as the “Hitachi Feminist Boyfriend.”


Koch decries ‘corporate welfare’ at GOP retreat but his firm gets millions in federal subsidies

Billionaire Charles Koch told a gathering of conservative donors Saturday that politicians must end taxpayer-funded subsidies and preferential treatment for corporations. That message, though, came from an industrialist whose company and corporate subsidiaries have raked in tens of millions of dollars worth of such largesse.

in the last 15 years, Koch’s firm Koch Industries and its subsidiaries have secured government subsidies worth more than $166 million, according to data compiled by the watchdog group Good Jobs First. The group says since 1990, Koch-owned properties have received more 191 separate subsidies worth a total of $195 million.


Muslim got Swedish citizenship and immediately raped a woman because he ‘could no longer be deported’


Lovely socialist Sweden again and it’s staggering Muslim rape waves. Once they get their citizenship in any country, they can no longer be deported. Time to change that rule when it comes to Muslims. A Muslim must always be eligible for immediate deportation, generally including the entire family of 30+.

Here a Muslim has raped a social case worker in revenge for managing muslim spousal abuse and honor killing cases, gloating that he could not be deported. He was given the five-star vacation of a Swedish prison for a mere 3.5 years, which entails a private chef, game rooms, television, and hotel styled living – and often, even home visits. No wonder the entire muslim world, notoriously demonic, dream of Sweden where no sensible laws exist to deal with their barbarity.

You may recall a few years ago when police in Norway openly declared in media that “100%” of all rapes in Oslo were committed by “immigrants”. On further inquiry it was revealed that the rapes were not in fact committed by immigrants in general, but by MUSLIM immigrants. Why tarnish other immigrants that have a low incidents of crime and rape if one specific group stand out like a sore thumb?

We know that rape has increased in Sweden by 1395 percent between 1975 to 2014. A significant spike in rapes was immediately apparent with the first larger batch of Muslim migrants arriving to the country. Roughly 80%+ of rapes in Sweden are committed by Muslims (even police admitted this when we contacted them), but the numbers can be much higher because statistics don’t reveal what birth country or religion rapists who got granted Swedish passports fall into.

Navy to Charge Officer Who Fired on Islamist During Chattanooga Terror Attack


A report at The Navy Times in July confirmed that one of the Marines shot during the Chattanooga terrorist attack exchanged fire with the terrorist. Navy Lt. Cmdr Timothy White also shot back at the terrorist.

But rather than being celebrated as a hero, Lt. Commander White may be charged for discharging a firearm on federal property.
Allen West reported this week that Lt. Commander Timothy White

Ladies and gents, resulting from the text message I received yesterday, I can confirm that the United States Navy is bringing charges against Lt. Cmdr Timothy White for illegally discharging a firearm on federal property.

The text message asked if it would be possible for Lt.Cmdr White to reach out to me. To wit I replied, affirmative.

What kind of freaking idiots are in charge of our Armed Forces — pardon me, our “unArmed Forces”? What would they prefer that Abdulazeez had been able to kill all the Marines and Sailors at the Naval Support Reserve Center? Let me draw an interesting contrast: Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus is more concerned about lifting the ban on transgendered Sailors. Mabus has a problem in that for the first time since 2007 the US Navy will not have a Carrier Battle Group operating in the Persian Gulf. But this knucklehead has no problem with the Navy seeking to destroy the career of a Sailor, a commander of an installation, returning fire against an Islamic jihadist attack. I do not care if it was his personal weapon, he deserves a medal for facing the enemy.

Folks, this has become the Obama military that will not implement policies for our men and women in uniform to be protected — but will punish them if they do protect themselves. What ever happened to the Navy of John Paul Jones, Farragut, Halsey, and Nimitz? What has happened in our America where we believe that our men and women in uniform — especially the commanders — are just targets for these damn Islamic jihadists?

Britain’s jihadi bride groomer: Schoolgirl radicalised in London mosque recruited her three classmates to join ISIS in Syria

A teenage jihadi bride who groomed three of her school friends to join her in Syria to fight for Islamic State was radicalised at a women’s charity based at one of Britain’s biggest mosques, it has been claimed.

Sharmeena Begum became one of the youngest British teenagers to join the murderous IS terror group when she fled from her home in East London and travelled to Syria last December aged 15.

Three months later, three of her closest school friends – Amira Abase, 16, Kadiza Sultana, 16, and Shamima Begum, 15 – also fled to Syria, triggering an international search to rescue them. 

Islamic leaders and some of their family members blamed the internet for grooming the four schoolgirls, who were all pupils at Bethnal Green Academy in Tower Hamlets, East London.

But now it is claimed that Sharmeena was first radicalised inside the East London Mosque, Whitechapel, allegedly by women from a group called Islamic Forum of Europe (IFE). She then allegedly groomed three friends to join her at the meetings. 

The IFE previously attracted controversy because one of its founders is a suspected Muslim extremist accused of 18 murders and war crimes in his native Bangladesh. 

Family members and relatives of the teenager broke their silence and told The Mail on Sunday that they suspect rogue individuals within the IFE’s women’s wing, known as the Sisters Forum or Muslimaat, advised her to travel to Syria in the wake of her mother’s death. The IFE has denied the claims.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3182561/Britain-s-jihadi-bride-groomer-Schoolgirl-radicalised-London-mosque-recruited-three-classmates-join-ISIS-Syria.html#ixzz3hfd7p5o9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

black feminazis confessed that #blacklivesmatter is only for black women, queer and trans


Internal tensions between activists arose during a “Black lives matter” protest in front of the SEPTA Station on 15th and Market.

“Say Her Name: Black Men in Defense of Black Womenhood,” a demonstration promoted on social media “in support of justice for Sandra Bland, Deidra Reid, and countless other black women who have been victims of police terror” had an attendance of roughly 60 participants.

The protest comes during the recent discussions of Sandra Bland, 28, who died in the Waller County Jail after a traffic stop in Prairie View, Texas, escalated into a physical confrontation. Growing social media speculation on her death has lead to many activists questioning how Bland died.

It was a diverse array of Philadelphians holding up countless signs of the names of unarmed black women slain by police enforcement. Some also mentioned “Free Mumia,” “Jail killer cops!!,” and “Stop and Frisk/Stand Your Ground = Racial Profiling”

“Say her name: Sandra Bland, Miriam Carey, Yvette Smith…and the countless other black women who we speak life into when they are murdered under police containment,” said Melanie McCoy, a Black Lives Philly movement activist.

Tommy Joshua of the Philly Peace Park, 35, then supported her words.

“I’m a son, husband, and lover of all black women,” Joshua, who also put together the demonstration, said. “I’m really aware of the distance I have to walk in being a man in this particular movement.”

However, when Megan Malachi, 34, of the Action Against Black Genocide Coalition received the megaphone and began to speak on “black women being silenced in their own movement,” Joshua interrupted her.

“She began to talk down on black men and that rubbed me the wrong way,” Joshua said. “I am out here fighting for them – this wasn’t the place.”

Some women during the demonstration spat epithets at Joshua during the confrontation that began to divide the protest. One shouted that his “misogynistic penis is trying to speak for black women.”

“I was annoyed today – this event was another hijacking of women, queer and trans,” Megan says.  “The men slated to speak at this demonstration are known sexists and know nothing about intersectionality within this movement that originated from three queer women of color for that purpose.”

Malachi, who is also apart of the Philly Coalition for Real Justice, also felt that the event was “patronizing for black women who have had to always fight for black male lives when the same wasn’t done in return,” she said.

“I want these men to stop with this Peace Queen bulls— that is continuing to oppress us all,” she added.

“If you are a part of another agenda or movement – I’m not…I wanna free my people,” said Natasha Danielle, 28, after the rally.

After hearing about the event from a text message from Joshua, she felt “it was important for black women and men to unite for this.”

“I’m not into feminist agendas and all of this ownership of coalitions…they can take all of this stuff cause I wanna take my freedom, “ she added.

And as the crowd began to die down at end of the second hour, Joshua reflected on the divide.

“I’m constantly fighting my own sexism,” he said. “I know that all black lives matter, especially women.”

Serbia: Professor of Sharia law leads Islamic State recruitment


An Islamic scholar? A professor of Sharia law? Recruiting inside a mosque? How could such  a learned personage get involved with Islamic State recruitment? How did Idriz Bilibani miss all the Qur’an’s peaceful teachings that are so patently obvious to John Kerry and David Cameron and all the other Western non-Muslim leaders who have assured us that the Islamic State is completely un-Islamic? How could the mosque leaders have allowed this?

“‘Islamic scholar behind IS recruitment in Serbia,’” b92.net, July 27, 2015:

There, they fight on the side of Islamic State, according to a report in the Belgrade-based newspaper Blic.

“According to the most recent data of security services about the terrorist organization ISIS, professor of Sharia law Idriz Bilibani, also known as Sheik, used, together with Denis Hadzic from Novi Pazar, the space for prayer in the Furkan mosque in Novi Pazar for preaching radical Islam,” said the article.

The pair “called for jihad, a holy war, and called on people to join the war in Syria by fighting against the forces of legitimate President Bashar el-Assad.”

“The masjid Furkan in Novi Pazar is not a recruitment center for joining the Syria war, but it is a place where one can establish contact with people fighting on the side of ISIS,” a source with knowledge of the Serbian security services’ data on “fighters in Syria” told the daily, and added: “No weapons were ever found in those premises, but it is used to spread radical interpretations of Islam. And it is certain that all those who left Serbia to join the war in Syria had been to Furkan.”

Idriz Bilibani was arrested in Kosovo last September and released a month later. He was placed under house arrest on October 16. Bilibani last time posted a message on his Facebook account, which has more than 3,400 followers, last December.

“According to security services, about 20 Serbian citizens went to fight on the side of Islamic State in Syria. Some took their whole families with them and settled there. There is the so-called Balkan Brigade in ISIS that fights in Syria and Iraq,” the paper writes, and adds that all Serbian citizens who “went to jihad” are members of this brigade….