JAXA plans Japan’s first moon shot in 2018

The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) is planning to attempt Japan’s first lunar landing in fiscal 2018, sources close to the project said Sunday.

JAXA has said it will use unmanned probes to study the possible use of materials on the moon as well as its environment, which could pave the way for future manned missions.

JAXA is expected to brief a government panel on the project with the aim of securing funding for mission preparations from the budget for fiscal 2016, which begins next April, the sources said.

The mission involves the experimental Smart Lander for Investigating Moon and would represent Japan’s first lunar exploration attempt since JAXA launched an unmanned orbiter in 2007.

SLIM is likely to be launched on an Epsilon advanced rocket, the sources said.

The SLIM mission is aimed at establishing a method for pinpoint landings that would make it possible to approach a target area with a level of accuracy ranging in the hundreds of meters.

In 2013, a Chinese probe made the world’s first soft landing on the moon in nearly 40 years, joining both the United States and the former Soviet Union as the only countries to achieve the feat.

Only the United States has achieved a manned moon landing.


Government to promote reform proposal to public

Government to promote reform proposal to public


The Chief Secretary, Carrie Lam, says senior officials will reach out to the community to promote the government’s proposed reform package, which is expected to be announced on Wednesday.Mrs Lam said the large-scale promotional campaign is aimed at familiarising the public with the importance and urgency of political reform. She said the responsible officials are determined to gain support from the public, and hoped that the campaign could be done in peaceful and rational manner.

Meanwhile League of Social Democrats lawmaker Leung Kwok-hung says he’s willing to resign if the public thinks LegCo should support the upcoming political reform proposal.

He insists that he will veto the proposal, reiterating that a de-facto referendum is the best way to find out what the public thinks about the issue.

He added that he’s not worried that some pan-democratic lawmakers will change their votes, saying they will have to face the consequences of doing that.


Jazz Hands Please: NUS Now Says It’s ‘Sexist To Compliment A Woman On Her Handwriting’


The world of student politics is a conflicted place. It can becolonialist and Eurocentric” to commemorate the Holocaustone minute but “racist” and “Islamophobic” to condemn ISIS the next. The NUS calendar for 2015 continues that theme of lively, contradictory thinking when it holds its annual conference in Liverpool on April 21 (before the black students conference, the disabled students conference and the “anti-racist, anti-fascist” event).

In a taster of what to expect, the University of Bristol’s motion – which has been democratically ratified by its student union – is called: “Research sexism in education environments,” and proposes that it is sexist to compliment a woman on her handwriting.

A copy of the motion was leaked to the Bristol Tab, it reads:

“There is a false assumption that with the access of women into Higher Education and with the majority of students being women that the classrooms or labs are not spaces where sexism is felt.

“Women are always asked to justify their claims of feeling uncomfortable or to ‘prove’ that a space is hostile.

“It is widely assumed that learning spaces can no longer be male dominated and that women can’t feel excluded given that they might outnumber men in the room.

“However we still hear things like ‘you are good at logic for a girl’, ‘your handwriting is nice’ said by a male lab demonstrator.

“We’re still not feeling confident to ask questions at a research seminar, women still speak less in seminars compared to men, and still experience sexual harassment at academic conferences – this is anecdotal evidence usually shared in safe spaces.

“But we know that in many subjects women student numbers drop from undergraduate, to postgraduate taught to then postgraduate research level because educational spaces and academic attitudes are patriarchal and unwelcoming.”

There you go. Even though, as the authors admit, women outnumber and outperform men in higher education, they continue to be the victims because men are nice to them.

This, from the same young minds that brought us NUS Women’s Campaign and its plea for the use of jazz hands instead of clapping.

#expogate #CalgaryExpo faces consumer backlash after expelling female critics of feminism





A group of female webcomic artists and online radio hosts have been ejected from the Calgary Expo, a Canadian pop culture convention, after publicly disagreeing with members of a feminist panel discussion.

Staff at the expo informed them that they had received reports of ‘harassment’ at the panel, but footage of the discussion shows that no such behaviour took place. Consumers accused the Calgary Expo of engaging in political intolerance, and have begun a boycott of the convention’s sponsors.

The ejected group are co-hosts of the Honey Badger Brigade, an online radio show that covers politics and pop culture. It was set up in 2013 by Alison Tieman, creator of the Xenospora  webcomic. Both the comic and the show have acquired a dedicated fan base in recent years, and it was fans who helped raise over $9,000 for the Honey Badgers to set up a promotional booth at the Calgary Expo.

Previous guests on the radio show included porn star and activist Mercedes Carrera and science fiction author Brad R. Torgersen, both of whom are prominent critics of the trend towards intolerance and censorship in popular culture. According to the Honey Badgers, convention staff approached them early on Friday and informed them that their group was not just banned from the convention, but from all conventions managed by Fan Expo, which runs a number of similar events across Canada.

For a team of webcomic artists and pop culture commentators, this is a serious professional blow – made all the more frustrating by the convention’s refusal to provide a clear reason for their course of action. I spoke to Alison Tieman and other members of the Honey Badger Brigade yesterday.

According to their account, they encountered no problems at all on the first day of the convention, when  they were simply manning their booth. In the afternoon, however, Alison and other members of their group decided to attend a feminist panel event discussing the depiction of women in comic books.

During the Q&A session, Alison publicly disagreed with one of the panelists, and gave a short statement in which she argued that the brand of feminism articulated by the panelists was too quick to embrace victimhood. This appears to have been the catalyst for the expo’s decision to eject the Honey Badgers from their conference.

Alison says that their booth was approached by convention staff early on Friday, who informed them that they would have to leave. Convention staff refused to give a reason for their decision without a guarantee that their conversation was not being recorded.

According to Tieman, convention staff told her “if we tried to record them, they would just eject us without giving a reason.” Once recording equipment had been turned off, the Honey Badgers were informed that there had been 25 separate reports of ‘harassment’ at the panel event.

When pressed, staff were unable to point to specific instances of harassment, but nevertheless went ahead with the ejection. The Honey Badgers captured a full recording of the discussion, which reveals no sign of harassment or disruptive behavior. Although they clearly disagree, both Alison and the panelists exchange their views civilly. Unless disagreement counts as harassment, it is difficult to tell what the problem was.


Karen Straughan, a well known YouTube pundit and co-host of the Honey Badgers says Tieman’s comment was a “classic second-wave feminist” argument, arguing against the casting of “actual, real-life women in the comic book industry as damsels in distress”.

Straughan also emphasised the civility of Tieman. “She engaged in no violations of policy, she used no abusive language. She asked for permission to speak, was granted permission to speak, and spoke her mind – and that’s apparently harassment!” The Calgary Expo released a statement explaining their decision. Claiming to provide a “positive and safe event for everyone”, the Expo said they “had reason to believe that the Exhibitor in question [did] not fall in line with this mandate”.

The expo have yet to highlight a specific example of the Honey Badgers compromising the safety or positivity of the event. By way of contrast, Karen alleges that the people who really felt unsafe at the event were the Honey Badgers’ fans. “They were afraid to talk to us, and we had to reassure them” says Karen. “There was one guy who was basically having a panic attack right there.

He was worried that if he was seen speaking to us then that would be a big problem for him.” I asked the expo if they had any plans to address this in line with their mandate of “safety” and “positivity”, but they have yet to provide any details beyond their initial statement. Backlash The Expo’s response was unconvincing to consumers, who quicklyflooded the #CalgaryExpo hashtag with critical tweets.

Many alleged that the convention was using “safety” as an excuse for political discrimination, while others noted the hypocrisy of expelling female creators from a pop culture convention in the name of feminism.

Consumers aren’t just speaking out on Twitter. They’re also complaining to the Calgary Expo’s sponsors, which include CMP Chevrolet, Vue Weekly, Pattison Outdoor advertising, Air Electronics, and ATB Financial. Threads to co-ordinate the email campaign have been posted on Reddit and 8chan. Company representatives are likely to find themselves with flooded inboxes on Monday. One former sponser has alreadydistanced themselves from the expo.

No doubt aware of their PR misstep, the Calgary Expo’s social media team have begun deleting potentially offensive tweets. A tweet linking to an article from the feminist blog The Mary Sue was deleted, perhaps out of fear that the close connection between the blog and the expo would add legitimacy to claims of political discrimination. Another tweet containing an image some found offensive was also deleted, no doubt to avoid further controversy.

None of this frantic PR manuevering has done any help for the Calgary Expo’s credibility, and they now face a campaign from angry consumers. Their convention’s hashtag, #CalgaryExpo, has been completely taken over by their critics, and despite some praise from progressive blogs, the consensus of pop culture fans is turning against them. Thousands of fans are now urging the Expo to retract their decision and own up to their mistake.

None of this is any solace to Alison, the 23-year veteran of the comic book industry, who has suffered the most professional blowback from the incident. Now facing permanent exclusion from Canada’s most popular pop culture convention, she posted a tearful video to YouTube giving her full account of the ordeal.


It will be difficult for the Calgary Expo to maintain their argument that they were trying to create a “safe and welcoming environment” when they have a debacle like this on their hands. Alison’s video is likely to add fuel to what now appears to be the start of long-term campaign against the convention’s sponsors, with the expo’s bizarre code of conduct likely to become a key target.

This story is another example of the continued politicization of pop culture, a trend which shows no sign of stopping. Video games, sci-fi, and comic books have become flashpoints, with creators and companies facing an unprecedented level of pressure. No doubt the majority would like a de-escalation in the conflict, but political intolerance is a poor way to go about it.

Just Like Buckley Said


Women’s Liberation, as modern feminism was called when it erupted from the New Left in the late 1960s, was still rather a new phenomenon in 1970 when William F. Buckley Jr. was invited to debate Germaine Greer at England’s Cambridge Union. Buckley later recalled the problem:

She insisted that I formulate the resolution, which I attempted to do from this side of the Atlantic, using what was then known as Western Union. The trouble was that she rejected my first three proposals on the grounds that they were, if I remember stupid, asinine, something similar for the third. The ‘telephone call from the president of the union was now desperate. The BBC, which was filming the encounter needed to know the resolution before noon the next day, when their guide went out to print. I sat down at the typewriter and typed out “Resolved: Give Them an Inch and They’ll Take a Mile.”

In that, Buckley was exactly right, and was prescient in discerning the essential problem with feminism, namely that it has no logical stopping point. Give them every demand they ask today, and feminists will return tomorrow with a new list of demands.

Feminists originally claimed to seek “equality” and yet, once this was achieved, it was not enough. An absolute majority of U.S. college students (57%) are female, and women are 33% more likely than men to earn a college degree. As college education is widely considered a chief socioeconomic indicator of middle-class status, one might suppose such statistical evidence would suffice to satisfy feminist demands.

Alas, there is no limit to their totalitarian ambition, and feminists have lately begun demanding that male students be stripped of due process rights on campus. “Last year California passed a law that defined nearly all sex on college campuses as rape unless proven otherwise,” as Ashe Schow has observed. The anti-male climate in higher education has become so intense that one college student in Oregon found himselfbanned from parts of campus because a female student said “he reminded her of the man who had raped her months before and thousands of miles away.” Of course, if there aren’t enough actual rapes to justify this kind of hysterical paranoia, feminists have proven they are willing to exploitfictional rapes in order to justify their anti-male jihad. The wholly imaginary “Haven Monahan” was used to frame Phi Kappa Psi fraternityat the University of Virginia and, in response to this highly publicized lie, the university’s president shut down all fraternity parties on campus.

Feminism’s implacable hostility toward males is by no means limited to university campuses, however. BuzzFeed recently offered “23 Writers With Messages For Straight White Male Publishing.” These messages, from attendees at the annual Association of Writers & Writing Programs conference, suggested that the employment of heterosexual males in the publishing industry is a social injustice:

In fact, the book publishing industry is overwhelmingly dominated by females. A 2010 survey by Publisher’s Weekly found that “85% of publishing employees with less than three years of experience are women.” In other words, women are 5 out of every 6 recent hires in the industry. Yet women writers seem to believe that this is not enough. Apparently, feminists won’t be happy until all editors are females and allpublished books are written by women authors. And after they ban male students from college campuses, we suppose, feminists will then make it illegal to teach boys to read. Because . . . EQUALITY!

Canadian gender equality under threat from ‘society of immigration’: Former PM Kim Campbell

Canadian gender equality under threat from ‘society of immigration’: Former PM Kim Campbell


EDMONTON — Former prime minister Kim Campbell told a University of Alberta audience Wednesday the equality of women is a Canadian value that has found little purchase in a “society of immigration.”

Some individuals in Canadian society, she said, come from cultures that don’t believe in gender equality.

“I’m always very concerned about cultural practices which suggest that women bear responsibility for the sexual behaviour of men,” she said, referring to coverup garments like the burka.


“A naked woman standing on the corner may get arrested for public nudity, but she is not fair game for physical assault.”

She also commented on the use of the niqab, a veil that covers women’s hair and faces, at citizenship ceremonies.

“In an open society, people are seen,” Campbell said.

She said one of Canada’s challenges is to guide the integration of cultures that don’t share this value. Better education of Canadian residents is the key, she said, adding if Canadians don’t understand their own history and values, people new to the country will find them difficult to learn.

Canada needs to address its changing values in the run-up to the country’s 150th anniversary, the audience was told as part of a panel discussion that included former Liberal foreign affairs minister Lloyd Axworthy and that was held by the Peter Lougheed Leadership College. Panellists talked about determining what Canadian values are and how to transform them for a globalized world.

Axworthy lauded Canada’s 150th anniversary as a chance to create a “new narrative” in Canada. He said Canadian values have to change because of the creation of the “security state” after 9/11, the expansion of the digital world, and shifting demographics.

“Our North American piece of rock no longer is immune to anything — disease, disaster, terrorism,” he said.

Axworthy also talked about the indignities committed against Canada’s aboriginal population as an impediment to the Canadian value of inclusion. He said that Canada can’t represent itself as a “civil society” to the world until those wrongs are redressed.