CBC breaches multiple journalistic ethics standards to smear gamergate

Every time mainstream media brings up #GamerGate they seem to focus solely on harassment and an angle manufactured around misogyny. One of the big problems is that some of this coverage from the mainstream outlets happens to be purposefully done to push an agenda. Worse yet is that some journalists don’t mind pushing the agenda. Thankfully, disillusioned gamers and a couple of journalists have decided to fire back.

For those out of the loop the CBC, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, recently ran a one-sided hit-piece against #GamerGate on their national television station (one hit-piece out of many, I might add). They claimed that #GamerGate was a harassment campaign to push females out of the gaming industry and to keep them out; a message that feeds into the fear-culture perpetuated by viewer-bait outlets.

 

http://linkis.com/po.st/9ALpA

 

CANADA: “Hug a Terrorist” event is part of a campaign to ‘normalize’ Islamic terrorism

TORONTO – A controversial pro-Palestinian campaign was held at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont. Thursday aimed at raising awareness of the civilian deaths in Gaza.

The event, called “Hug a Terrorist”, was created by McMaster’s Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights (SPHR) group and is based on a viral video of the same named filmed in Toronto over the summer.

One student who took offense to the event said the ironic use of the term “terrorist” was being insensitive given the recent attacks in Ottawa and Quebec that killed Warrant Officer Patrice Vincent and Cpl. Nathan Cirillo who lived in Hamilton

Jacob Klugsberg, a fourth-year McMaster student, said he was “shocked” to learn of the on-campus event.

“This shameful publicity stunt trivializes the severity of international terrorism and undermines the corresponding suffering that it causes victims and their families,” Klugsberg wrote on Facebook. “My sympathy will always be with the victims of senseless acts of violence, not those who seek to divide and demoralize us by using violence.”

 

‘Hug a terrorist’ event brings debate on Middle East conflict to McMaster University

 

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2014/11/15/canada-hug-a-terrorist-event-is-part-of-a-campaign-to-normalize-islamic-terrorism/

 

 

 

 

 

Muslims and Dhimmi’s throw Christian monster drink woman out of her church for saying Jesus is her Lord.
Bukhari Volume 1, Book 9, Number 490:
Narrated ‘Aisha: The things which annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said, “Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman (if they pass in front of the praying people).” I said, “You have made us (i.e. women) dogs. I saw the Prophet praying while I used to lie in my bed between him and the Qibla. Whenever I was in need of something, I would slip away for I disliked to face him.”

 

 

Muslims keep robbing churches in Germany to fund jihad

 

http://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2014/11/15/muslims-keep-robbing-churches-in-germany-to-fund-jihad/

 

The Case Against Bart Ehrman’s Historical Jesus: Aeon Byte Gnostic Radio

 

Published on Jun 2, 2013

In his best-selling Did Jesus Exist?, Bart Ehrman harshly dismisses Mythicists, alternative scholars, and many in the Esoterica, as well as circles the wagons around a historical Jesus Christ. A new book responds to all of this, its contributors some of the august scholars and pioneering Freethinkers of our era: Robert Price, D.M. Murdock, Richard Carrier, Earl Doherty, and more. More than a treatise on the Mythicist Case and refutation of Ehrman’s polemics, it’s a penetrating view of early Christianity and its surrounding faiths. We deeply mine the various aspects of Mythicism, as well as find out where Ehrman went wrong (which is basically where all Orthodoxy goes wrong).

Astral Guest– Frank Zindler, editor and contributor of Bart Ehrman and the Quest of the Historical Jesus of Nazareth: An Evaluation of Ehrman s Did Jesus Exist?, author of The Jesus the Jews Never Knew, and managing editor of American Atheist Press.

 

 

 

 

Walmart Just Bowed To Islamic Sharia Law To Appease Angry Muslims

http://madworldnews.com/walmart-bowed-sharia-law/

 

As America veers towards Islamic Sharia law in order to cater to the demanding minority of Muslims, citizens are seeing not only an attempt to include and appease Muslims, but an infringement upon the rights of the majority.

With such a vocal group as that of Islam in the U.S., major corporations are making a shift toward including the brutal slaughter that is halal, and the newest addition to the list of Muhammad-approved businesses is the largest superstore yet.

The Miami Student reports that Wal-Mart has taken the leap into dangerous waters, approving the provision of halal meats.

With a petition, Oxford assistant professor Tareq Hasan Khan and the Muslim Student Association (MSA) of Miami University has pressured Wal-Mart into providing meats that have been slaughtered in a manner acceptable by halal standards, as per the Quran.

(Let it be noted that the petition garnered only 50 signatures while passed around the internet.)

According to the Quranic definition, halal livestock should be slaughtered by slitting the throat of the beast, bleeding the animal out by the throat, all while invoking the name of Allah in prayer. It’s often argued that halal slaughter is the most humane form of butchery, claiming that the animal endures as little pain and suffering as possible, but the documented videos reveal the ugly truth.

Senior Saara Khalid said that as a Muslim, it is hard to find halal options on campus, especially for those students who do not wish to be vegetarians. In addition, students requested specific brands of halal meat to be provided in Oxford grocery stores. “Since the Halal chicken and meat has to be certified, we strongly recommend the local stores to sell chicken products from Crescent Foods and beef products from Midamar,” Khan said, according to the Miami Student.

However, Khalid fails to mention that if Muslims can find no halal amenities, Muslims may eat whatever they are given, according to the Surah of the Quran.

Surely a sizable business like Wal-Mart wouldn’t be intimidated by 50 Muslims, so why would they make such a significant change to their stock? Will Wal-Mart properly label the halal so that non-Muslims do not accidentally consume such cruelly slaughtered animals? Finally, where is PETA to demand that halal meats be banned from the corporation because of such inhumane treatment?