Women only tv company self destructs over petty female infighting

Over in one corner sat Alice, a strong-minded 27-year-old who always said what she thought, regardless of how much it might hurt someone else. In the other corner was Sarah, a thirtysomething high-flier who would stand up for herself momentarily – then burst into tears and run for the ladies.

Their simmering fight lasted hours, egged on by spectators taking sides and fuelling the anger. Sometimes other girls would join in, either heckling aggressively or huddling defensively in the toilets. It might sound like a scene from a tawdry reality show such as Big Brother, but the truth is a little more prosaic: it was just a normal morning in my office.

The venomous women were supposedly the talented employees I had headhunted to achieve my utopian dream – a female- only company with happy, harmonious workers benefiting from an absence of men.

It was an idealistic vision swiftly shattered by the nightmare reality: constant bitchiness, surging hormones, unchecked emotion, attention-seeking and fashion rivalry so fierce it tore my staff apart.

When I read the other day that Sienna Miller had said there was no such thing as ‘the Sisterhood’, I knew what she meant.

I can understand why people want to believe that women look out for each other – because with men in power at work and in politics, it makes sense for us to stick together.

In fact, there was a time when I believed in the Sisterhood – but that was before women at war led to my emotional and financial ruin.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html#ixzz3BPnD1WJW
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

One thought on “Women only tv company self destructs over petty female infighting

  1. I heard that there was a European version of Survivor – called Robinson something or other. At one point (season) they had two groups: one all-male, the other all-female.

    The groups had no contact with one another; it was a Sociologist’s dream – to compare these two ‘societies.’.

    Since women are deemed to better communicators, and all of the participants were young and healthy, it would be interesting to see how the ladies group outperformed the male team.

    After a week, with no hut built, no means of food acquisition, and fear that they would not survive, the ladies team was in peril. Three men were ‘traded’ for three women. The three men worked like crazy to make the improvements necessary, while the three female additions to the male team relished the attention and relatively higher standard of living.

    So much for the Sisterhood.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.