feminist hypocrisy: I Hate Men Dot Org and an Ontario Liberal

while feminazis forced a liberal candidate to apologize for stating the biological difference between men and women on facebook. feminazis ignore anti-male sentiment on the internet.  it is ironic and funny that they are using computers, internet browsers,  and keyboards which are designed, invented and built by MEN to call for hatred,  and genocide against men. the sex that invented everything around them.  They hate men so much but they have no problem using technologies that are invented BY MEN.

 

http://www.returnofkings.com/20712/i-hate-men-dot-org

http://news.mensactivism.org/node/21787

 

Feminazi whiners forced Ontario Liberal to apologize to stating the obvious differences between men and women backed up by peer reviewed scientific research

 

http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/ontario-liberal-candidate-apologizes-for-man-vs-woman-facebook-post-1.1816573

 

 

feminazis can use the internet invnted by men all day long call for the dehumanizing, enslavement, neutering, genocide of males and nobody speak out against that, calling this humor and jokes. but the minute somebody say they are not feminists, don’t agree with them, state the obvious biological differences between men and women. these same   feminazi cunts shut you down, call your superiors to get you fired, etc

 

 

 

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-mens-brains-are-wired-differently-than-women/

How Men’s Brains Are Wired Differently than Women’s

Male brains have more connections within hemispheres to optimize motor skills, whereas female brains are more connected between hemispheres to combine analytical and intuitive thinking
http://news.discovery.com/human/life/science-behind-gender-differences-130528.htm
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131202161935.htm

Shailene Woodley: I’m Not a Feminist “Because I Love Men,”

 

……….

 

What would Tris Prior say? Divergent‘s Shailene Woodley became the latest famous woman to distance herself from the F word, feminism, in a Time article on May 5. The Fault in Our Stars actress, 22, says she doesn’t consider herself to be a feminist, “because I love men.”

“I think the idea of ‘raise women to power, take the men away from the power’ is never going to work out because you need balance,” she explained to Time. “With myself, I’m very in touch with my masculine side. And I’m 50 percent feminine and 50 percent masculine, same as I think a lot of us are. Also I think that if men went down and women rose to power, that wouldn’t work either. We have to have a fine balance.”

Over the past few years, Woodley has made a name for herself in film after years of appearing on ABC Family’s drama The Secret Life of the American Teenager. She received a Golden Globe nomination for her role in 2011’s The Descendants, and soon after signed on to star as the headstrong Tris Prior in the YA Divergent series’ film adaptations.

 

Just because she doesn’t consider herself a feminist, however, doesn’t mean she can’t appreciate women. In fact, she thinks the bigger problem exists between women.

“My biggest thing is really sisterhood more than feminism,” she continued. “I don’t know how we as women expect men to respect us because we don’t even seem to respect each other. There’s so much jealousy, so much comparison and envy. And ‘This girl did this to me and that girl did that to me.’ And it’s just so silly and heartbreaking in a way.”

 

Read more: http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/shailene-woodley-not-feminist-i-love-men-201455#ixzz31RPKPPSA

Feminist governance: Female television celebrity wins bid to keep allegations of sexual bullying secret k

Woman accused of sexual harassment wins bid to stay anonymous. Men don’t have this luxury when they face  accusations of rape and sexual harassment.

 

 

 

A TV star is trying to keep sensational claims of sexual misconduct made against her by a former employee secret because she is  ‘a well-known media personality’, it can be revealed.

The blonde celebrity, who is a household name, is being accused by the ex-sales director of her  company of sacking him because  he rejected her sexual advances.

The explosive claim is one of several allegations, including that she wore provocative clothing, made inappropriate sexual comments and called the 39-year-old employee’s Muslim fiancee a ‘P***’.

 

The former senior executive will claim unfair dismissal against the celebrity and her company at an employment tribunal in London this week. But the celebrity’s lawyers have successfully applied for a reporting restriction to be granted, meaning neither she nor the executive can be named.

 

The Mail on Sunday has learned that the woman’s lawyers argued that, because sexual misconduct allegations were being made, if her identity was made public, regardless of the outcome of the tribunal, her reputation would be irreparably damaged. In addition, it might jeopardise her charity work and her status as a ‘well-known media personality’.

 

It is understood that the employee, who worked for her for six months, will allege that the celebrity, who is in her 50s, said she ‘only employed good-looking men’ and that she made inappropriate comments about the employee’s looks in front of clients.

The employee was invited on two foreign work trips, which he did not attend, as the celebrity’s ‘personal chaperone’ and he was asked if he wanted to join her on a visit to the Playboy club. 

Furthermore, the celebrity – who lives with her partner – confided in the employee that she was having an affair and once tried to set him up on a date with a celebrity friend of hers.

It is understood that the respondents deny the allegations and will contest them at the tribunal.

A source told The Mail on Sunday last night: ‘She’s doing everything she can to stop this from coming out. It’s just not right. She’s an absolute nightmare and when she eventually realised nothing was ever going to happen, she got rid of him.’

When The Mail on Sunday spoke to the employment tribunal on Friday afternoon they confirmed that a reporting restriction had been granted the previous day. Asked for an explanation, an employee said: ‘Because it involves an allegation of sexual misconduct. When it comes to that we don’t name the parties.’

But the names of claimants and respondents are usually reported in employment tribunals involving sexual discrimination and harassment. The listings for upcoming tribunals are freely available and members of the press and public are allowed to attend.

There is a presumption of open justice unless naming a particular party would put the case at risk.

The Government has introduced fees for tribunals to weed out claims designed to embarrass former employers.

Lib Dem MP John Hemming said: ‘These cases worry me. I’m not sure that it’s a reasonable route to take.

‘I’m very uncomfortable with secrecy being used, because secrecy normally acts to conceal the truth over time. I don’t think that in any way the argument that someone is well known justifies keeping their name secret.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2625226/Female-television-celebrity-wins-bid-allegations-sexual-bullying-secret.html#ixzz31QUcp4XY
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

The Donald Sterling Situation: Why it MATTERS and How Blacks REALLY SCREWED UP!!

Published on Apr 30, 2014

After banning Donald Sterling from the NBA for life, there was much celebrating, specifically amongst African Americans, but in reality what was actually accomplished? As usual, Blacks were left with nothing but a moral “victory.” Black leadership, in an outside of the NBA blew perhaps the greatest opportunity to advance the conditions of African Americans since the so-called Civil Rights Movement.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEVhxHjjKRs

 

 

 

 

Exhorbitant yearly increase of hajj fares worrisome

religion exist to control people and make money from them.  Islam is no different

 

We have noted with grave concern and disbelief the quantum jump of the recently announced Hajj fare for the 2014 pilgrimage to Mecca.

The Hajj pilgrimage is the fifth pillar of Islam, a once-in-a-lifetime obligation for all Muslims who have the means. It is therefore very central to the Islamic faith. However, the exorbitant increases in the cost for successive Hajj over the years is denying thousands of Ghanaian Muslims the opportunity to honour this pillar of faith.

For instance, in 2011, the Hajj fare was around 47million old cedis, it upsurged to 52million old cedi in 2012,signifying a 9% increment. In 2013, it climbed up to 68million representing a 23.5% increment. Again, just lastweek, the National Hajj committee announced that, it has pegged the 2014 Hajj fare at US $3450, equivalent to a 100million old cedis showing an increase of approximately 32%. It is clear from these statistics that the Hajj fare has increased by more than a 100% within a period of just four years. We are afraid that if this trend continues unabated, the average Ghanaian pilgrim will have to pay through his nose to be able to perform Hajj in the next five years

In the words of the National Hajj Committee head, Alhaji Abdul Rauf Tanko , the committee decided to maintain last years’ US $3450 because the just ended Hajj conference in Saudi Arabia did not make any substantial changes to last year’s arrangement that could have affected the fare. However, the Hajj committee failed to inform prospective pilgrims and the general public why they have to pay over 32million old cedis more when the fare has not been upwardly adjusted.

It is worrying to note however that, though the 2014 Hajj fare remains unchanged (US $3450) in dollar term, its equivalent value in cedis has ballooned to 100million old cedis . Thus, within a space of a year, Ghanaian pilgrims will have to cough an extra 32 milliion old cedis more than they paid last year.

Equally frustrating is the fact that the general living conditions of the Ghanaian has worsened over the past few years. Almost on a weekly basis, the Ghanaian pays more on utilities food ,shelter , transportation etc. So with all these hardships , coupled with these exhorbitant charges, how does the Government expect Muslims to embark on this pilgrimage, which is a pillar central to the Islamic faith.

We are, in view of the above expressed concern, calling on the Government to act swiftly to reduce the cost of the 2014 Hajj exercise.

Additionally, the government should come clean on the details and the nature of sponsorships it gives to Muslim pilgrims. What is known is that , but for the few hundreds of party foot soldiers that receive sponsorships from the public purse , every other pilgrim bears the full cost which covers all their expenses including airfare, feeding, accommodation and administrative charges.

Again, Transparency and accountability in managing hajj affairs is not only necessary but expedient in building pilgrims’ confidence in their quest to perform one of the pillars of Islam. Therefore the commission should go beyond mere announcement of Hajj fares via press statements. It should in its future engagements, make public the detailed financial analysis on the causes of increase in Hajj fares together with a comprehensive breakdown of services to be rendered to pilgrims vis-a –vis the cost implications for the benefit of the public.

Samudeen Mustapha

Publicity Secretary

 

http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/religion/artikel.php?ID=306968

WWYD? – Fake Homeless People Scamming Pedestrians Out Of Money!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCuKNSM4fBU

 

Published on Feb 24, 2014

In this scenario we witness a man and woman who pretend to be homeless in order to take advantage of unsuspecting pedestrians as they walk by and drop money in their hats all while the customers at the restaurant know they are faking it..but will they drop the bomb on them and rat them out??