How black are Jews?

Abagond

Jews are on average about 3% to 5% black according to a genetic study by Priya Moorjani in 2011. Not just European Jews but even those in Turkey, Iran and Iraq, whether Sephardic or not. (She did not study Ethiopian Jews.)

This is less than Arabs who live in the Levant – Israel, Lebanon, Syria, etc, the part of the Middle East Jews came from. There people are generally 4% to 15% black. But it is more than most Southern Europeans (1% to 3% black) and Northern Europeans (0% to 1% black).

Here “black” means genes from sub-Saharan Africa not counting those that were brought to Europe 45,000 or more years ago when anatomically modern humans arrived (Homo sapiens sapiens as opposed to Neanderthals).

Moorjani used as her sample of black people those of Kenyan Bantu, South African Bantu, Mandenka, Mbuti Pygmy, Biaka Pygmy and Yoruba stock.

By this…

View original post 433 more words

Frazier Glenn Miller’s ties to a 1987 triple slaying: Did the feds protect a killer?

On April 13, Frazier Glenn Miller was arrested after he allegedly shot and killed three people at a Jewish Community Center and a Jewish retirement center in suburban Kansas City. Within hours of the arrest, the media reported that Miller had a long history as a white supremacist and virulent anti-Semite who has spent time in prison and, more importantly, been freed in plea deals with the federal government.

Two defense attorneys tell Raw Story that Miller was working out his end of such a plea deal when he appeared as a witness for the prosecution in a murder trial nearly three decades ago. But they say it was obvious to them even then that Miller should have been considered the prime suspect in that crime — a crime that, to this day, remains unsolved.

As Miller faces charges for killing three people in Kansas City, these attorneys say it’s fair to ask the federal government – why wasn’t Miller in prison many years before this?

Sometime shortly before midnight on January 17, 1987, three masked men entered the Shelby III Adult Bookstore located outside Shelby, North Carolina, a business known for attracting a gay clientele. The men ordered the store’s four customers and a clerk to the floor, and then shot them, execution style, in the back of their heads. The masked intruders took cash from the register and rigged up plastic gallon jugs filled with gasoline and detonation fuses, planning to burn the bookstore to the ground.

Of the five victims, only three – Travis Melton, 19, Kenneth Godfrey, 29, and Paul Weston — died from the gunshot wounds. Two others — James Parris and John Anthony — were still alive. The bullet that wounded Parris exited his left eye socket, but he and Anthony both managed to get out of the building while it was catching fire.

“I was still knowing part of what was going on,” Parris testified later. “I felt the blood running over my hand. “

Parris stumbled from the store. Unable to see, he tried his keys in one car, then a second one, which started. He pulled the car away from the building and up U.S. 74. He flashed his headlights until a passing motorist stopped and phoned police.

In the months following the crime, investigators proposed numerous theories about the motive for the murders: a mob hit, a business dispute, perhaps even a homosexual relationship “gone sour.” But nothing produced any suspects.

Then in April 1987, authorities turned their eyes to the White Patriot Party. The WPP was founded in 1985 by Frazier Glenn Miller after Morris Dees and the Southern Poverty Law Center obtained a federal court order prohibiting Miller from organizing militia training with the Carolina Knights of the Klu Klux Klan. Dees and the federal government then obtained evidence that Miller had violated the terms of the federal consent agreement. In a federal trial in 1986, Miller was convicted of contempt of court. He was sentenced to one year in prison, with six months suspended. While his case was on appeal, Miller went on the lam.

Miller writes in his autobiography, A White Man Speaks Out, that he left his wife and children on March 18, 1987 to “go underground” and “wage war against the Jews and the federal government.” He went to Oklahoma to pick up Robert Eugene “Jack” Jackson, and Douglas Lawrence Sheets. A third man – Anthony Wydra – met the trio in Asheville, N.C. The quartet made thousands of copies of Miller’s “Declaration of War,” and mailed them to media outlets and white supremacy organizations across the nation. The declaration was also mailed to federal officials, including federal prosecutors.

Miller had declared war on “ni**ers, Jews, queers, assorted mongrels, white-race traitors and despicable informants,” and suggested awarding points as a kind of bounty system. “Ni**ers (1), other assorted mongrels (Mexicans, etc) (2), Jews (10), influential Jews (25), Queers (5), White Race traitors (10), Scalawags (10), Carpetbaggers (10), Abortionists (20), Race traitor politicians and Judges (50), Informants and government witnesses (50), Morris Segilman Dees (888).”

Miller’s uprising was short lived. On April 30, 1987 he and the three other men were arrested in Ozark, Missouri. Federal authorities found a weapons cache which included explosives, automatic weapons, and hand guns. Also seized in the raid were gloves and ski masks.

Miller says in his autobiography that the federal officials approached him with a plea deal.

“I was to plead guilty to one count of felony possession of a hand grenade and answer all questions posed to me by the authorities,” he writes. “In return, they would recommend a 5-year prison sentence, immunity from any further prosecution by either state or federal authorities, and entrance into the Federal Witness Protection Program which included the financial support of my family while I served my sentence.”

Miller claims the information he provided to authorities did not result in any indictments or prison sentences. (The Southern Poverty Law Center reports that Miller testified against 14 white supremacy leaders on charges of sedition. None were convicted.)

One person Miller testified against was Doug Sheets, in a 1989 trial for the Shelby III bookstore killing.

Prosecutors had come to believe that Sheets and Jackson, two of Miller’s “Declaration of War” partners, had committed the murders at the adult bookstore as a result of their extremist views.

Sheets was tried in April and May 1989, and Jackson’s trial was scheduled to take place once it was done. News clippings of the time report that it was known Miller was testifying against former members of his White Patriot Party as part of a plea deal.

Miller told the court that Sheets and Jackson had told him they had committed the killings in Shelby. Three other witnesses also said they’d heard Sheets talk about the killings while they were incarcerated with him in prison. One was a former White Patriot Party member who had abandoned the Miller group in the Ozarks, allegedly after hearing the story of the bookstore murders from Sheets and Jackson. That witness, Robert Stoner, received $5,000 from the federal government for his role in the indictments against Sheets and Jackson, as well as entry into the witness protection program after a bounty was put on his head by members of the Tennessee KKK.

Prosecutors also presented evidence that gloves found in the weapons cache from the April 1987 Missouri raid were linked by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms to fibers found on the plastic jugs used to torch the bookstore.

But prosecutors couldn’t put Sheets or Jackson at the scene. In fact, they had alibis that put them in other states around the time of the bookstore killings. Sheets had evidence that he’d been in Kansas the day before the killings, and a blizzard that struck made it virtually impossible for him to have been in North Carolina to commit the crime.

As the trial went on, Sheets and his attorneys pointed out that it was Glenn Miller who didn’t have an alibi for the night of January 17, 1987.

On the stand, Sheets said that Miller had told him that “he damn sure made a big boom in Shelby.” Miller, meanwhile, in pretrial statements had referred to a feature in the bookstore – a two-way mirror – that suggested he might have taken part in the killings himself.

Don Bridges, one of Sheets’ attorneys, also recounted to jurors a conversation between Miller, Sheets, and Jackson. “Don’t worry boys,” Bridges said Miller told them, “I’m going to be pointing the finger at you, but don’t worry. You can’t be convicted because it’s all hearsay evidence.”

That turned out to be true. With no way to put Sheets at the scene of the murders, he was acquitted. Jackson’s trial was then canceled. To this day, there’s been no other trial or conviction for the murder of the three men at Shelby.

And now, two of the attorneys who helped defend Sheets say they believe that Glenn Miller should have been the one prosecuted.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/04/18/frazier-glenn-millers-ties-to-a-1987-triple-murder-did-the-feds-protect-a-killer/

Girl charged for making false rape claim that sent a man to jail for four nights

A teenage girl has been charged over allegedly lying about being sexually assaulted in a toilet block at a Sydney train station.
The 17-year-old claimed to have been dragged off a train and into the toilet block at Strathfield station about 1pm on January 22 this year, police allege.
Investigators were told a man struck up a conversation with the girl as she travelled from Redfern station to school.
But the girl has now been charged with making a false statement with intent to subject others to investigation and was ordered to appear in the Children’s Court next month.
Police withdrew a charge of sexual intercourse without consent against Ben Kooy, 34, late in January.
The Kellyville man was initially refused bail and spent four nights in custody but police found fresh evidence and released him before an appearance at Burwood Local Court.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/strathfield-station-sex-assault-case-girl-charged-over-false-statement-20140319-3522y.html#ixzz2zGhpeVgQ

HASTINGS-ON-HUDSON – A woman who stabbed herself and told police she had been kidnapped and sexually assaulted by her ex-husband and two other men was charged with filing a false report, officials said.

Christine Capurso, 49 — whose ex-husband is Robert Capurso, an assistant fire chief in Yonkers — turned herself in to police and was to be arraigned in Village Court late Wednesday.

“Even though this is only a misdemeanor charge against (Christine) Capurso, we felt it was very important that we fully investigate this case because of the serious implications of her false allegations of being kidnapped, sexually assaulted and stabbed,” said Westchester County police Capt. Christopher Calabrese, who investigated the case.

http://www.lohud.com/story/news/local/westchester/2014/03/26/woman-charged-falsely-accusing-ex-husband-sexual-assault/6935241/

An innocent man spent 12 hours in custody after being falsely accused of sexually assaulting a young mum.

Joanna Robertson also cost police 69 man hours — at least £1,380 — investigating the complaint that the man had stalked her and forcefully touched her, Dundee Sheriff Court heard.

Robertson, 25, of Leith Walk, pleaded guilty to a charge of wasting police time on July 6 last year.

After admitting she had made up the sex attack, Sheriff Richard McFarlane deferred sentence for reports and granted her bail.

The court heard Robertson went to police HQ in Dundee and claimed she had been stalked through the city centre before being pushed against a wall and attacked.

She said the man had tried to strike up a conversation with her outside a bank before following her into Coutties Wynd, off Nethergate.

Robertson claimed he had forced her against a wall between two wheelie bins before touching her private parts over her tights then attempted to further assault her.

But when police carried out a CCTV review they found her story did not add up.

http://www.thecourier.co.uk/news/local/dundee/woman-continued-false-sexual-assault-claim-even-when-cctv-contradicted-statement-to-police-1.290696

Bloodline — or Baloney?

Those boring genealogies that no one bothers to read (begat, begat, begat) actually say a great deal about holy deception. The Jesus bloodline has more to do with lucky numbers than history!

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbSOUgcvXRY
  • But it’s ALL a miracle …

    Rationalising Jesus into the merely human requires a great deal of invention. Yet this is no human story to which a few embellishments have been added. The entire gospel tale is a concatenation of the miraculous.

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h081NP4b6t4
  • Rocky Horror — Fisherman Peter lucks out!

    The ambitions of Rome can be read in the fanciful career appointment of Peter, so-called Prince of the Apostles.

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIataX0o9po
  • The misandry of orphan black

    http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2014/04/male_characters_on_orphan_black_are_undeveloped_making_the_show_s_feminist.html

    Orphan Black is all about a woman, Sarah, and her many, many clones (all played by Tatiana Maslany), so it’s no surprise that the male characters are secondary to the plot. But the men aren’t simply less important to the story than the women. They are less than, full stop. With one exception, the male characters of Orphan Black are purposefully insubstantial, bordering on feeble. This gender reversal is not an accident on the part of the show’s creators, Graeme Manson and John Fawcett; it’s clearly a conscious decision, and it effectively delivers the show’s most potent message about the nature, quality, and persistence of the enemy.

    Orphan Black’s straight men are among the stupidest and least riveting fictional creatures to populate the modern television landscape. After years of suffering through completely unrecognizable female characters on TV, it’s hard not to celebrate the show’s almost gleeful denigration of its straight male characters. Orphan Black’s creators are not interested in speaking to the straight guys’ justifications or needs, except to show how superficial they are. The straight men of Orphan Black are stupid, weak, simple, unethical, violent, buffoonish, and easily manipulated. They are purposefully one-dimensional sketches denied the layers and complex motivations given to the female characters.

    Canadian Feminist Kyla Garvey Gets Two Firemen Fired

    http://www.returnofkings.com/17666/canadian-feminist-kyla-garvey-gets-two-firemen-fired

    Nearly 100 recent homicides linked to users of Stormfront white supremacist site, SPLC says

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/04/18/nearly-100-recent-homicides-linked-to-users-of-stormfront-white-supremacist-site-splc-says/

    A white supremacist charged with killing three people near two Jewish community facilities in suburban Kansas City this week posted more than 12,000 messages on a racist website which carries the slogan “No Jews, Just Right,” according to an organization that tracks hate groups.

    The online activity by Frazier Glenn Cross follows a trend in which prolific posters on hate online forums are becoming “disproportionately responsible” for racist murders and mass killings, according to a report released on Thursday by the Southern Poverty Law Center, a non-profit civil rights organization.

    The report said nearly 100 people in the last five years have been murdered by frequent users of one white supremacist website, Stormfront. The site describes itself as a community of “White Nationalists” and “the voice of the new, embattled White minority.”

    “It has been a magnet for the deadly and deranged,” said Heidi Beirich, author of the report.

    According to the report, past participants in forums on the website included Wade Michael Page, an Army veteran who opened fire at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin in 2012 killing six people before taking his own life.

    Another was Anders Behring Breivik, a Norwegian extremist who massacred 77 people in a bombing and shooting spree in Oslo and at a nearby youth summer camp in 2011.

    Stormfront owner Don Black told Reuters that Cross had never been allowed to post on his site, and that Breivik and other killers named by the SPLC had been banned.

    “We’re obviously a big website, and any site is likely to have a few unstable people pass through. Facebook, Twitter, and particularly Craigslist have had their share,” Black added in a statement he posted on his website.

    “Like all good propaganda, it’s a mix of truth, half-truth and outrageous lies,” Black wrote of the SPLC.

    Frazier Glenn Cross often posted on Stormfront until he was banned from the site in 2005 after testifying in a trial against white supremacists, said Mark Potok, a senior fellow with the Southern Poverty Law Center.

    Law enforcement and human rights groups have identified Cross as a former senior member of the Ku Klux Klan and someone who has repeatedly expressed hatred for Jewish people.

    Cross, who also goes by the name Glenn Miller, later switched to another white supremacist forum, Vanguard News Network, where the center tracked his postings over the last five years.

    “These killers are really hiding in plain sight on these forums,” Beirich said.

    Vanguard did not immediately respond to an email to the website seeking comment.

    Cross faces one count of capital murder in the fatal shooting of Reat Underwood, 14, and his grandfather, William Corporon, 69, outside a Jewish community center and a charge of first-degree murder in the death of 53-year-old Terri LaManno. Cross is being held on a $10 million bond.

    Potok called on law enforcement, particularly the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, to increase its focus on racist online forums.

    Brandeis University bows to Islamism

    It’s been a year since two bombs exploded at the Boston Marathon.

    Three people lost their lives in the attack, including a young child, yet it is still taboo in many quarters to criticize the ideology that sparked such senseless violence.

    Islam’s fundamentalists can still scare Westerners away from defending intellectual freedom — including some we expect to show backbone.

    Brandeis University in Boston was to confer an honorary degree on well-known author and apostate of Islam, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, for her extraordinary research and scholarship on worldwide Islamic issues.

    Fundamentalists at the Islamic Society of North America, the Council on American-Islamic Relations and at its student body, the Muslim Students Association, launched a campaign at Brandeis against Hirsi Ali and the university withdrew its offer.

    The West has come to cower in the face of such protests.

    The first case in recent memory where we had to confront radical Islam’s ferocious intolerance was over Salman Rushdie’s novel The Satanic Verses, a fictional account of an incident narrated in Hadith, Islam’s secondary texts.

    Islamic countries banned Rushdie’s book and a bounty was placed on him.

    The West at that time was less afraid of radical Islam’s outrages than it is today and continued to promote and honour the book.

    But this sort of courage has now become rare.

    Today, parochial Muslim students need only howl about imagined or manufactured insults to Islam, and institutions are bullied into trembling compliance.

    Such protests have seen books withdrawn and independent-minded professors silenced.

    This Hirsi Ali fiasco is only the latest assault on free speech.

    In Cleveland, the same crowd is challenging another professor, Samir Abdul Latif, for opposing jihad.

    Central to the West’s stance on freedom of conscience is the notion that almost any opinion has the right to be held and heard, even if it is manifestly mistaken.

    But Hirsi Ali, of all public intellectuals, need not defend the validity of her views, when she so sensibly asks: “Is the concept of holy war compatible with our ideal of religious toleration? Is it blasphemy — punishable by death — to question the applicability of certain seventh-century doctrines to our own era?” Her courageous intellectual challenge to political Islam’s equivocation about the roots of terrorism and her valiant crusade for universal women’s rights are things the Western world should cherish.

    We should seize any opportunity to acknowledge publicly women like her and to uphold them as role models.

    The broader issue is how long the West will tolerate assaults on intellectual freedom.

    The Western way of life is being blatantly compromised, yet few are brave enough to man the barricades.

    North American universities must resist kowtowing to radical Islam’s agenda of quashing free speech.

    They must ponder the consequences of caving in to radical Islam’s increasingly outrageous demands.

    There must be some serious soul-searching here.

    It is time to protect the long-cherished ideal of free, critical thought, which the West has fought for through many of its own convulsions.

    It is time to formulate a cogent response to Islamist assaults on freedom of speech and to implement it in an unflinching manner.

    The comment of Brandeis president Fredrick Lawrence that the university chose to back down over the issue of Hirsi Ali’s honorary degree because of “certain of her past statements”, shows there is no place for him on the barricades of freedom.

    http://www.torontosun.com/2014/04/17/brandeis-university-bows-to-islamism?token=00b89f9bcc33e07afcf77e50709bd039

    Equal ≠ The Same: Sex Differences in the Human Brain

    Early in 2013, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered the makers of the well-known sleep aid Ambien (zolpidem) to cut their recommended dose in half-but only for women. In essence, the FDA was acknowledging that despite extensive testing prior to the drug’s release on the market, millions of women had been overdosing on Ambien for 20 years. On February 9, 2014, CBS’s 60 Minutes highlighted this fact-and sex differences in general-by powerfully asking two questions: Why did this happen, and are men and women treated equally in research and medicine?1

    The answer to the first question is that the biomedical community has long operated on what is increasingly being viewed as a false assumption: that biological sex matters little, if at all, in most areas of medicine. The answer to the second question is no, today’s biomedical research establishment is not treating men and women equally. What are some of the key reasons for the biomedical community’s false assumption, and why is this situation now finally changing? What are some of the seemingly endless controversies about sex differences in the brain generated by “anti-sex difference” investigators? And what lies at the root of the resistance to sex differences research in the human brain?

    Why Sex Didn’t Matter

    For a long time, for most aspects of brain function, sex influences hardly mattered to the neuroscience mainstream. The only sex differences that concerned most neuroscientists involved brain regions (primarily a deep-brain structure called the hypothalamus) that regulate both sex hormones and sexual behaviors.2 Neuroscientists almost completely ignored possible sex influences on other areas of the brain, assuming that the sexes shared anything that was fundamental when it came to brain function. Conversely, the neuroscience mainstream viewed any apparent sex differences in the brain as not fundamental- something to be understood after they grasped the fundamental facts. By this logic, it was not a problem to study males almost exclusively, since doing so supposedly allowed researchers to understand all that was fundamental in females without having to consider the complicating aspects of female hormones. To this day, neuroscientists overwhelmingly study only male animals.3

    To make matters worse, studying sex differences in the brain was for a long time distasteful to large swaths of academia.4 Regarding sex differences research, Gloria Steinem once said that it’s “anti-American, crazy thinking to do this kind of research.”5 Indeed, in about the year 2000, senior colleagues strongly advised me against studying sex differences because it would “kill” my career.

    https://www.dana.org/Cerebrum/2014/Equal_%E2%89%A0_The_Same__Sex_Differences_in_the_Human_Brain/

    Update Young Male Rape Victim Found & Police Investigating Woman In Video!

    news andcommentary

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IUl_UfsPmU&feature=youtu.be&a
  • 30 Year Old Black wmn Murders 16 Year Old Boy Later Found Out

    news and commentary

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7J22LFLzCas&feature=youtu.be&a
  • 2 Moms Arrested For Leaving 4 Kids Home While They Clubbed & Got Into A Fight!

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KN3QTcZQicg&feature=youtu.be&a