Michael Coren – Islamic Sharia law adopted by British legal chiefs

while feminazis are using twitter to call for the genocide of men. islamists with the help of their dhimmi slaves are imposing sharia




Calls for a Parliamentary inquiry into the scale of Islamic law in the UK are mounting after the body representing solicitors in England and Wales issued formal guidance on making “Sharia compliant” wills.

The Law Society was accused of giving its stamp of approval to discriminatory practices after it published advice on writing wills which deny women an equal share and exclude “illegitimate” children or unbelievers.



Gender doesn’t belong on birth certificate, insane mom says

A Saskatoon mom has filed a human rights complaint over the province’s requirement for sex to be listed on birth certificates.

“I think it’s premature to identify a gender for someone (in infancy),” Fran Forsberg said in an interview. “Who are we to say what a person’s gender is?” Forsberg’s six-year old daughter Renn was born male, but around the age of three began to express herself as a girl. Renn had started showing self-destructive behaviour, but that ceased when she began “gravitating to what society says (are) female clothes,” Forsberg said.

“As soon as we listened to our child and allowed her to be who she is, then she was a lot happier,” she said, noting birth certificates are used for registering for school, library cards and licences.

Renn’s birth certificate identifies her as male. Forsberg said she doesn’t “feel like that’s anyone’s business.”

That ‘M’ or ‘F’ can be changed if a person has sexual reassignment surgery, but “there are trans people who don’t want to alter their bodies,” Forsberg said.

The discrepancy can cause problems – such as a female adult trying to enter the U.S. when her birth certificate identifies her as male, she said.

While Forsberg acknowledged sex and gender are separate issues, she said she still questions the need to record a newborn’s sex.



California’s Senate To Declare Women Are Houseplants

There is a bill presently active on the floor of the California State Senate, which if passed into state law, will legally redefine almost all consensual sex as rape. It is California Senate Bill 967.

The full title of the bill is : An act to add Section 67386 to the Education Code, relating to student safety.

It certainly relates to student safety. It makes all sexual activity completely unsafe for male students. If a male student has any sexual contact of any kind with a female colleague, no matter how much both parties to such contact participated of their own choice and volition, the simple fact that a male student has a sexual identity is enough to send him to jail as a rapist.

How does consensual sex come to be defined as rape under the new proposed State law?

Section 1.a.1 of the senate bill’s text includes the following phrase:

“Consent must be present throughout sexual activity”

And this consent is explicitly not the nonverbal agreement that almost all sexual activities in the entire history of the human species have been conducted under for the span of recorded time. No sir. Consent, as defined in the language of Senate Bill 967 requires

“An affirmative consent standard in the determination of whether consent was given by a complainant. “Affirmative consent” is a freely and affirmatively communicated willingness to participate in particular sexual activity or behavior, expressed either by words or clear, unambiguous actions. It is the responsibility of the person who wants to engage in the sexual activity to ensure that he or she has the consent of the other person to engage in the sexual activity. Lack of protest or resistance does not mean consent, nor does silence mean consent. For that reason, relying solely on nonverbal communication can lead to misunderstanding.” (and jail)

Anything less is rape, so says the law. Or, so it will say when Senate Bill 967 passes into statute.

This bill, once law, will jail thousands of young men as rapists – and none of them will have committed rape, except as defined by a new legal standard no sane adult would ever agree is anything except normal, non-pathological, non-coercive, and nonviolent consensual sex. But in the language of California Senate Bill 967, that will, under color of law, be rape. If you live in the state of California, then you, or perhaps your son, will be jailed by it. He will be ruined for his lifetime. Rendered a criminal, a sex offender, and a casualty of your inattention and indifference.

If you are a woman in California, particularly, if you are of college age, or a more mature returning student, the implications of this potential law are a little different for you.

We will set aside, for the present, any considerations of compassion or concern you might have for male friends, colleagues or relations.







4 in 10 high school boys, young men report coerced sex

Forty-three percent of U.S. high school boys and young college men report they had an unwanted sexual experience — 95 percent with a woman.

Read more: http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2014/03/25/4-in-10-high-school-boys-young-men-report-coerced-sex/3421395770501/#ixzz2xCH8KZiD




Rosewood was a Black town in the American state of Florida that was burned to the ground in 1923 by Whites. The state of Florida says eight died: six Blacks, two Whites. Survivors say between 40 to 150 died, nearly all of them Black. Several eyewitnesses saw a mass grave of Blacks with maybe 27 bodies, but to date it has not been found.

No Whites were ever charged with a crime, though the state did pay reparations in 1994.

Rosewood seemed to get along with the neighbouring White town of Sumner. But then one morning, on Monday January 1st 1923, Fannie Taylor, a White woman of Sumner, came out of her house screaming that a Black man had beat her up. Rumours cried rape.

Bloodhounds led the police and a gang of armed White men to Rosewood, to wagon tracks behind the house of Aaron Carrier

View original post 430 more words

Unpaid internships at magazines new target of Ontario labour ministry

Two of Canada’s highest profile magazines have been told by the Ontario Ministry of Labour to immediately end their internship programs after complaints about unfair labour practices.

The Walrus and Toronto Life magazines will shut down their programs on Friday, after an inspector from the ministry informed the publications that their programs, which brought in aspiring journalists, designers, and others for temporary unpaid stints, contravened the Employment Standards Act.